Which one do I choose?

Answer:

It shows that they saw men as more important than women.

Explanation:

If men were given longer names and women were all the same then that shows how they wanted the men to be recognized individually.

Answer:

I would still go to the new town, with the passes I currently have, I will then go to the Public office in which handles these things, and request a new one, once approved, go to my grandmother, if you're not approved, I'll still go, and when I am arrested challenge it in the Supreme court.

Answer:

I think it means that Hitlers party found a way out of/around the treaty. However it could also be showing that the treaty was just weakly enforced. Either one of those is arguably right, or you could just say both.

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer of this question is,

Explanation:

Self determination for farmers, carmichael and hamilton is that type of determination which are taken by the farmers for their own profit or income.

Answer:

I guess it's (A) by lobbying officials.

Answer:

The answer is... by lobbying officials

Explanation:

Hope this helps! :D

Manufacturing increased fourfold, the permanent population increased, and the urbanization and modernization of Texas were well underway. Many military installations closed at the end of the war, and some wartime boomtowns were all but abandoned. Because of World War II, the face of Texas changed forever.

Answer:

The Republican minority in Congress complained that the Sedition Act violated the First Amendment to the Constitution, which protected freedom of speech and freedom of the press. ... Both argued that the federal government did not have the authority to enact laws not specified in the constitution.

Explanation:

The Court took this opportunity to officially declare the Sedition Act of 1798, which had expired over 150 years earlier, unconstitutional: “the Act, because of the restraint it imposed upon criticism of government and public officials, was inconsistent with the First AmendmentThomas Cooper, a lawyer and newspaper editor in Sunbury, Pennsylvania, was indicted, prosecuted, and convicted of violating the Sedition Act after he published a broadside that was sharply critical of President Adams.The Republican minority in Congress complained that the Sedition Act violated the First Amendment to the Constitution, which protected freedom of speech and freedom of the press. ... Both argued that the federal government did not have the authority to enact laws not specified in the constitution

Answer:

Some of the ways bias can affect criminal trials includes: How jurors see defendants. Certain biases can make jurors more or less sympathetic to a particular defendant. The most obvious example is race.

Brainliest please!

Answer:

the person above me is correct

Explanation:

just helping them get brainliest

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

Option A

Explanation:

This situation represents an internal conflict of Brutus where he struggles to decide whether he should participate or not in the conspiracy. This situation is faced by an individual when he/she is struggling with an emotional issue.

Hence, option A is correct

Answer:

Speed is the rate at which an object's position changes, measured in meters per second. The equation for speed is simple: distance divided by time. You take the distance traveled (for example 3 meters), and divide it by the time (three seconds) to get the speed (one meter per second).

Could you please help me with the recent question of mine unanswered on my page? I will give u brainliest and 20 points! :))) X

Herbert Hoover had a very relaxed attitude towards the great depression. He believed that it would go away with time. He also thought that instead of government programs to help people, such as welfare, charities and churches should be taking care of people, not the government. Essentially he didn't think the government should be handling it. Over time, it became obvious that charities and churches could not help the millions of people in need that were starving and homeless. He enacted a few government programs but by then it was too late. The depression had lasted far too long, and people were done with him. He lost his reelection to Franklin Roosevelt.

Answer:

Passed by the 39 congress on March 2, 1867, it was used as the legal premise for impeaching President Andrew Johnson, whose Reconstruction policies were unpopular with the Radical Republicans in Congress. It was repealed in 1887 and declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1926.

Explanation:

- Eijiro <3

Answer:

I think the 1st amendment is the most important

Explanation:

I think its the most important because its the basis for our most important freedoms. If we didn't have the 1st amendment, we would be able to be arrested just for speaking and may not be able to follow the religion of our choice and we could be banned from protesting. The 1st amendment is needed to help secure our most precious freedoms and by far the most important

The Mauryan and Gupta Empires were different in several ways. One of the differences between the Mauryan and Gupta Empires is that, unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas collected taxes from districts and villages. option A is correct.

Option B is incorrect because the Guptas didn't establish a central government that allowed local rule; instead, they maintained a highly centralized government. Option C is also incorrect because the Mauryans didn't establish a central government that allowed local rule; rather, they maintained a centralized government.

Option D is incorrect because both the Mauryans and Guptas encouraged the construction of public works. Option E is incorrect because both the Mauryans and Guptas relied on a stable government, but they had different ways of achieving it.The Mauryan Empire, which existed from about 322 BCE to 185 BCE, was an ancient Indian empire that was centralized.

The empire was established by Chandragupta Maurya, who defeated Alexander the Great's successors, the Seleucids. Emperor Ashoka was one of the most significant Mauryan emperors. The Gupta Empire was an ancient Indian empire that existed from about 320 CE to 550 CE. The Guptas had a highly centralized administration, and their empire was more extensive than the Mauryans.

The correct option is A.

For more question The Mauryan

https://brainly.com/question/12001220

#SPJ8

Answer:

done

Explanation:

If people wanted to move into a polis, they would need a citizenship. There were two types of democracy, direct democracy and representative democracy. Direct democracy is when citizens take part in the every day affairs of the government.

Answer:

Bison can run very quickly and have thick outer skin making them difficult to hunt

Explanation:

Answer:

When buffalo became confused, they often did not run. Buffalo hunters took advantage of this and could kill many at a time because they stood still

Explanation: took the test

i this it should be a true

Answer:

When the British attacked Lexington and Concord in the spring of 1775 and were beaten back by the Massachusetts Patriots, South Carolina rallied to support the American Revolution. Loyalists and Patriots of the colony were split by nearly 50/50.

Explanation:

Answer:

Let me answer you...

Explanation:

Miranda began working on "Hamilton" in 2009. He was inspired to write a hip-hop musical about founding father Alexander Hamilton after reading the 2004 biography "Alexander Hamilton" by historian Ron Chernow. ... "It was, he thought, a hip-hop story, an immigrant's story."

Answer:

what exactly is it about?

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.

Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Sukarno in Indonesia didn't align with the US or USSR because they were firm believers in the foreign policy of neutrality. They had no special ties or preferences for the Soviet Union or the United States.

The advantage that this gave them was to remain neutral in the face of conflict, which they thought was positive to bring peace to the region during the Cold War years.

These two countries were part of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) that played a key role during the Cold War Years to help bring peace and stabilization

The NAM organization started in 1955 due to the Asia-Africa Conference of Bandung, Indonesia, to the initiative of Asian and African countries such as India, Pakistan, Burma, Indonesia, Ghana, and Ceylon.

Answer:

Martin Luther.

Explanation:

Martin Luther was a German theologian, a monk, an author, etc. among many other titles. He was famous for his "Ninety-Five Theses" which critiques the selling of indulgences by the Catholic Church. He would later be the influence behind the increase and spread of secular democracy in the Christian world.

Luther was against the practice of clergy selling plenary indulgences to the public. These indulgences are a sort of 'forgiven pass' for believers to get to heaven with lesser 'punishments'. This means that buying indulgences allow a person to get fewer punishments after death and get to heaven. Martin Luther believed that faith alone is the only requirement to get to heaven and not such indulgences. He famously printed his Ninety-Five Theses and nailed it to the Church door.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Only the federal government had the right to control interstate commerce.

Explanation:

This case began because New York gave one man a monopoly over the Hudson River, which runs through more than just NY. The case ended up in The Supreme Court with John Marshall as Chief Justice. In the constitution, it stated that the federal government had power over the state government. This meant that the states could not do anything to override the federal government. So, in the end, it was decided that only the federal government could control trade between or across states.

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional. Brown v. Board of Education was one of the cornerstones of the civil rights movement, and helped establish the precedent that “separate-but-equal” education and other services were not, in fact, equal at all.

Separate But Equal Doctrine  

In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that racially segregated public facilities were legal, so long as the facilities for Black people and whites were equal.

The ruling constitutionally sanctioned laws barring African Americans from sharing the same buses, schools and other public facilities as whites—known as “Jim Crow” laws—and established the “separate but equal” doctrine that would stand for the next six decades.

But by the early 1950s, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was working hard to challenge segregation laws in public schools, and had filed lawsuits on behalf of plaintiffs in states such as South Carolina, Virginia and Delaware.

In the case that would become most famous, a plaintiff named Oliver Brown filed a class-action suit against the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, in 1951, after his daughter, Linda Brown, was denied entrance to Topeka’s all-white elementary schools.

In his lawsuit, Brown claimed that schools for Black children were not equal to the white schools, and that segregation violated the so-called “equal protection clause” of the 14th Amendment, which holds that no state can “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

The case went before the U.S. District Court in Kansas, which agreed that public school segregation had a “detrimental effect upon the colored children” and contributed to “a sense of inferiority,” but still upheld the “separate but equal” doctrine.

READ MORE: The Family That Fought School Segregation 8 Years Before Brown v. Board of Ed

Brown v. Board of Education Verdict

When Brown’s case and four other cases related to school segregation first came before the Supreme Court in 1952, the Court combined them into a single case under the name Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.  

Thurgood Marshall, the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, served as chief attorney for the plaintiffs. (Thirteen years later, President Lyndon B. Johnson would appoint Marshall as the first Black Supreme Court justice.)

At first, the justices were divided on how to rule on school segregation, with Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson holding the opinion that the Plessy verdict should stand. But in September 1953, before Brown v. Board of Education was to be heard, Vinson died, and President Dwight D. Eisenhower replaced him with Earl Warren, then governor of California.

Displaying considerable political skill and determination, the new chief justice succeeded in engineering a unanimous verdict against school segregation the following year.

In the decision, issued on May 17, 1954, Warren wrote that “in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place,” as segregated schools are “inherently unequal.” As a result, the Court ruled that the plaintiffs were being “deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”

Little Rock Nine

In its verdict, the Supreme Court did not specify how exactly schools should be integrated, but asked for further arguments about it.

In May 1955, the Court issued a second opinion in the case (known as Brown v. Board of Education II), which remanded future desegregation cases to lower federal courts and directed district courts and school boards to proceed with desegregation “with all deliberate speed.”

Though well intentioned, the Court’s actions effectively opened the door to local judicial and political evasion of desegregation. While Kansas and some other states acted in accordance with the verdict, many school and local officials in the South defied it.

In one major example, Governor Orval Faubus of Arkansas called out the state National Guard to prevent Black students from attending high school in Little Rock in 1957. After a tense standoff, President Eisenhower deployed federal troops, and nine students—known as the “Little Rock Nine”—were able to enter Central High School under armed guard.

READ MORE: Why Eisenhower Sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock After Brown v. Board

Impact of Brown v. Board of Education

Though the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board didn’t achieve school desegregation on its own, the ruling (and the steadfast resistance to it across the South) fueled the nascent civil rights movement in the United States.

Answer:

banks and factories closed and people were out of work

Answer:

Banks and factories closed and people were out of work