The answer is option A. Case law refers to judicial decisions that apply to legal problems and interpret the relevant constitutional, legislative, and regulatory laws.
Case law refers to judicial decisions that apply to legal problems and interpret the relevant constitutional, legislative, and regulatory laws. As a result, this type of law develops over time, as judges interpret the facts and applicable laws in individual cases, and it becomes an important aspect of the legal system for future cases.Case law is also known as common law, and it may be either binding or persuasive. A binding case is one in which a higher court has decided the issue in question, making it mandatory for lower courts to follow that decision. A persuasive case, on the other hand, is one in which a court decision is not legally binding, but it is seen as relevant and useful in deciding a case.In conclusion, of the given options, case law refers to judicial decisions that apply to legal problems and interpret the relevant constitutional, legislative, and regulatory laws.
Learn more about judicial here:
https://brainly.com/question/30135176
#SPJ11
The New Deal:
a. Altered the makeup of the Supreme Court by increasing the number of judges and appointing new justices in the Supreme Court.
b. Faced much opposition from the White House and the Congress.
c. Was President Richard Nixon's action plan to alter the relationship between the people and their government.
d. Was never implemented due to the public's reaction.
e. Was a legislative package that rewrote the role of government, vastly increasing its size and its role in private commercial activity.
The correct option is not e. The New Deal was a series of programs and reforms enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression, aimed at providing relief and stimulating economic recovery. It did not rewrite the role of government to vastly increase its size and role in private commercial activity.
Out of the given options, the correct option is: e. Was a legislative package that rewrote the role of government, vastly increasing its size and its role in private commercial activity.The New Deal was a legislative package that rewrote the role of government, vastly increasing its size and its role in private commercial activity.The New Deal was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1939. It was a response to the Great Depression, and its programs sought to provide immediate relief to citizens as well as an overhaul of the financial system. The New Deal established a number of welfare state programs and protective regulations, with the goal of providing relief to the unemployed and stimulating economic recovery. The New Deal did not alter the makeup of the Supreme Court, nor was it President Richard Nixon's action plan to alter the relationship between the people and their government.
learn more about Roosevelt here;
https://brainly.com/question/1182184?
#SPJ11
1. The UN Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS) created a dispute settlement institution for signatories, known as:
Group of answer choices
the World Court on the Environment
the UN Environmental Program
the International Court of Justice
the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)
The dispute settlement institution for signatories created by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS) is known as the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a global treaty that regulates all aspects of ocean use. It specifies the rights and obligations of nations in their use of the world's oceans, thereby setting guidelines for businesses, the environment, and the management of natural resources. UNCLOS established a dispute resolution mechanism as part of the legal system that has jurisdiction over disputes relating to the Convention, its application, interpretation, or compliance.
The International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) is responsible for this dispute settlement mechanism. The ITLOS's functions are to settle disputes concerning the interpretation and implementation of UNCLOS, to provide advisory opinions on legal issues concerning the Convention, and to give binding judgments in disputes between States Parties over their maritime rights and obligations.
To know more about dispute settlement visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/32482169
#SPJ11
Remember that anything you write down as part of your examination for a report is subject to ____ from the opposing attorney.A) subpoena
B) discovery
C) publishing
D) deposition
Remember that anything you write down as part of your examination for a report is subject to subpoena from the opposing attorney. The correct answer is A) subpoena.
A subpoena is an official order issued by a court of law that compels a person to appear in court or provide evidence. It is a legal tool used in the process of gathering information and testimony relevant to a case. When a subpoena is issued, the individual who receives it is legally obligated to comply and appear in court or provide the requested information. Failure to comply with a subpoena can result in legal consequences. Subpoenas play a crucial role in ensuring the fair and thorough examination of evidence and witnesses during legal proceedings. They serve as a means to obtain information necessary for the pursuit of justice.
Learn more about subpoena here:
https://brainly.com/question/28234638
#SPJ11
While on their way home from a ball game a driver and his passenger stopped at an all night gas station
The driver and his passenger made a stop at an all-night petrol station on their way home after a baseball game.
The driver refuelled the vehicle, and the passenger made the purchases. They spotted a group of people gathering around a car in the parking lot who appeared to be having a heated debate as they left the business. The driver and passenger immediately concluded their transaction, returned to their car out of concern for their safety, and then sped away from the petrol station to continue their trip home.
learn more about passenger here :
https://brainly.com/question/26143594
#SPJ11
Company A signed a contract with a foreign importer, exporting agricultural products. The date for signature was September 1 and the time for shipment stipulated in the contract was October, November and December. However, after the mid-September, the domestic price of the contracted product rose to a significant extent. Company A found it would suffer great loss if it exported the goods according to the contract. Upon investigation, the reason for the rising of the price was the serious flood taking place in the producing area in mid-July. Can company A resort to force majeure clause the avoidance of its contractual obligations? What lessons can company A learn from this case?
If the contract contains a force majeure clause that addresses the scenario of a big price increase brought on by a natural disaster like a flood, Company A might be able to use it to get out of its contractual commitments.
Commercial contracts sometimes contain phrases known as "force majeure" that serve to release parties from liability if an unforeseen and uncontrollable occurrence stops them from carrying out their responsibilities under the contract.
The contract's precise provisions and the applicable laws of the contract's controlling country, however, determine whether the force majeure clause will apply. In order to decide whether Company A can make use of the force majeure provision in this instance, Company A needs to seek legal advice.
Learn more about on Company, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30532251
#SPJ1
When police officers conduct stops, searches, and arrests based on the race and ethnicity of people, they are most likely violating the of the U.S. Constitution. A. Fifth Amendment D. Fourteenth Amendment B. Nineteenth Amendment C. Fifteenth Amendment
When police officers conduct stops, searches, and arrests based on the race and ethnicity of people, the y are most likely violating the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans and enslaved people who were emancipated after the American Civil War, such as the right to vote and to receive due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment, according to the U.S. Supreme Court, is one of the most important amendments to the United States Constitution, as it applies many of the constitutional rights to the states.
Learn more about U.S. Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/30901480
#SPJ11
Discuss the Doctrine Piercing the Company Veil. What are the
circumstances under which a court will pierce the corporate
veil?
The doctrine of piercing the corporate veil allows a court to disregard the legal entity of a company and hold its shareholders or directors personally liable. This doctrine is applied in specific circumstances when the corporate structure is abused or misused.
Courts may pierce the corporate veil when there is evidence of fraud, illegality, or injustice. One circumstance is when there is commingling of personal and corporate funds, where shareholders fail to maintain a clear distinction between their personal and corporate finances. Another factor is inadequate capitalization, where the company is not adequately funded or lacks sufficient assets to cover its obligations. If the company is used as a mere instrumentality or alter ego to conduct personal affairs or evade legal obligations, the corporate veil may be pierced.
Additionally, if the corporate form is being used to perpetrate fraud or injustice, such as to shield shareholders from liability for their wrongful actions, courts may disregard the corporate entity. This is also applicable when a company is formed to evade existing legal obligations or to defraud creditors.
Piercing the corporate veil is an exceptional remedy, and courts apply it cautiously. Each case is evaluated on its specific facts and circumstances, considering factors such as the level of control exercised by shareholders, the degree of corporate formalities observed, and the fairness and equity of holding individuals accountable for the company's actions.
To know more about shield shareholders
brainly.com/question/32272504
#SPJ11
1. One of the foremost concepts central to many international instruments on the regulation of biotechnology (and a concept NOT accepted by the U.S.) is the:
Group of answer choices
Stockholm Declaration 21
the precautionary principle.
generally recognized as safe (GRAS).
the rule of law.
2. The Codex Alimentarius is the international body established by the UN that sets international food standards. The Codex has adopted 3 documents related to genetically-modified organisms (GMOs). Which one is NOT one the documents?
Group of answer choices
Guidelines for the COnduct of Food Safety Assessment of Food Produced Using Recombinant-DNA Microorganisms.
The Coordinated Framework on Biotechnology.
Principles for the Risk Analysis of Fooods Dericed from Modern Biotechnology
Guidelines for the Conduct of Food Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Recombinant DNA Plants
3. The 6 European Commission states adopted Directive 90/220, which effectively permitted the prohibition of the import of GMO products. The World Trade Organization (WTO) found that this Directive was a 'de facto' moratorium on GMO products.
Group of answer choices
True
False
The precautionary principle is one of the foremost concepts central to many international instruments on the regulation of biotechnology (and a concept NOT accepted by the U.S.).The precautionary principle is a risk management principle that stresses caution in the face of scientific uncertainty..
The Coordinated Framework on Biotechnology is NOT one of the documents adopted by the Codex Alimentarius related to genetically-modified organisms (GMOs).The Codex Alimentarius is a UN-established international body that establishes international food standards. It has adopted the following three documents related to genetically modified organisms: Guidelines for the Conduct of Food Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Recombinant DNA Plants.
Principles for the Risk Analysis of Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology. Guidelines for the Conduct of Food Safety Assessment of Foods Produced Using Recombinant-DNA Microorganisms.3. True, the 6 European Commission states adopted Directive 90/220, which effectively permitted the prohibition of the import of GMO products. The World Trade Organization (WTO) found that this Directive was a 'de facto' moratorium on GMO products.
To know more about instruments visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/31787997
#SPJ11
In the case that a CALD person being questioned by the police or
appearing before the court requires an interpreter:
a. According to the Recommended National Standards for Working
with Interpreters in. b. There may be times when the CALD person needs to be "linguistically present" either in court or at the police. What does this concept mean?
The concept of being "cpresent" refers to the essential need for a CALD (Culturally and Linguistically Diverse) person to fully understand and participate in legal proceedings with the assistance of an interpreter.
It recognizes that effective communication is crucial for the person to comprehend their rights, provide accurate information, and understand the proceedings against them. When a CALD person requires an interpreter in court or during police questioning.It is acknowledged that effective communication is essential for individuals to fully comprehend their rights, provide accurate information, and understand the legal proceedings they are involved in. In cases where a person from a Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) background requires an interpreter, such as in court or during police questioning, it is recognized that language barriers can hinder their ability to participate fully and effectively in the legal process.
learn more about cpresent here :
https://brainly.com/question/30349401
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT part of the structure developed by states that follow the federal court model?
a. trial courts of limited jurisdiction
b. trial courts of general jurisdiction
c. appellate courts
d. none of the above
Explain the difference between diversion, intervention, and community-based programming. Please be sure to name who might be involved in the programming. For example, administered by the courts or a nongovernmental organization. Also, include a paragraph for each - diversion, intervention, and community-based programming. Paragraphs have 4-6 sentences. You should also start by defining each type of programming by comparing or contrasting
Diversion, intervention, and community-based programming are different types of programs that are designed to help individuals who are experiencing challenges. Here are the differences between them:
Diversion: Diversion is a type of programming that is designed to help individuals who have been arrested or charged with a crime. The goal of diversion is to avoid formal prosecution by diverting the individual into a program that addresses the underlying issues that led to the criminal behavior. Diversion programs may be administered by the courts, nongovernmental organizations, or other community organizations. For example, a drug court may offer diversion programs for individuals who have been arrested for drug-related offenses. The program may involve counseling, drug testing, and other forms of support to help the individual overcome their addiction and avoid future criminal behavior.
Intervention: Intervention is a type of programming that is designed to help individuals who are experiencing challenges such as substance abuse, mental health issues, or family problems. The goal of intervention is to intervene early before the individual's problems escalate and lead to more serious issues such as criminal behavior. Intervention programs may be administered by schools, social service agencies, or other community organizations. For example, a school may offer an intervention program for students who are struggling with their grades or behavior. The program may involve counseling, tutoring, and other forms of support to help the student overcome their challenges and succeed in school.
Community-based programming: Community-based programming is a type of programming that is designed to address the needs of a specific community. The goal of community-based programming is to empower individuals and communities to take control of their own lives and address the challenges that they face. Community-based programming may be administered by community organizations, nongovernmental organizations, or other groups. For example, a community may develop a program to address the issue of homelessness in their community. The program may involve providing housing, job training, and other forms of support to help homeless individuals get back on their feet.
In conclusion, diversion, intervention, and community-based programming are all important types of programs that are designed to help individuals who are experiencing challenges. Each program has its own unique goals, and may involve different organizations and individuals in the delivery of services. By understanding the differences between these programs, we can better understand how to support individuals in need and build stronger, more resilient communities.
To know more about nongovernmental organizations visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30092510
#SPJ11
What best describes officers who engage in illegal activities only occasionally or when the circumstances of their work present an opportunity to do so?
Officers who occasionally or when the circumstances of their employment provide an opportunity to do so are known as "opportunistic corrupt officers."
These people may not have a tendency towards corruption or to act illegally on a regular basis, but they do use opportunities when they present themselves. Depending on the situation, opportunistic corrupt officials may give in to temptation or justify their behaviour. While some individuals may not have an inherent inclination towards corruption or habitual illegal conduct, they may still exhibit opportunistic behavior when presented with favorable circumstances. These opportunistic corrupt officials may succumb to temptation or rationalize their actions based on the specific situation at hand. It is important to note that not all individuals who engage in opportunistic corruption are inherently corrupt, but rather their behavior is influenced by the opportunities and justifications that arise in certain situations.
learn more about occasionally here :
https://brainly.com/question/19351055
#SPJ11
In an act of recklessness, Ryan bets his friends he can drive down a crowded street blindfolded, and he ends up striking Cameron. Under which of the following circumstances would Cameron be barred from any recovery from Ryan?A) If Cameron had bet Ryan's friends he could run in front of Ryan without being hitB) If Cameron was mildly intoxicated while walkingC) If Cameron could hear Ryan's car approaching but had no place to hideD) If Cameron had not looked before stepping into Ryan's path
In an act of recklessness, Ryan bets his friends he can drive down a crowded street blindfolded, and he ends up striking Cameron.
Under which of the following circumstances would Cameron be barred from any recovery from Ryan is if Cameron had bet Ryan's friends he could run in front of Ryan without being hit. Recklessness is defined as conduct in which a person has a higher risk of injury or damage than an ordinary individual would have. It is often used in tort law to decide whether someone who caused an accident or harm did so intentionally, with negligence, or recklessly. It's a more severe degree of negligence than the normal careless conduct. Negligence is a breach of duty owed to another person, whereas recklessness is an intentional act that results in an unreasonable risk of injury or harm to another person Torts are a type of civil law that encompasses a wide range of causes of action.
Learn more about recklessness here:
https://brainly.com/question/30901480
#SPJ11
the law office heading usually is printed on legal stationery
The law office heading is typically printed on legal stationery for professional identification and official correspondence purposes. The law office heading, printed on legal stationery, serves to provide professional identification, establish credibility, and facilitate official correspondence.
The law office heading is an important element of legal correspondence and documents. It is traditionally printed on legal stationery, which is a specific type of paper used in legal settings. The law office heading typically includes essential information such as the name of the law firm, the address, contact details, and sometimes additional details like the firm's logo or slogan. Printing the law office heading on legal stationery serves multiple purposes. Firstly, it adds a professional and formal touch to the documents, reinforcing the credibility and authenticity of the law firm. It helps establish a recognizable brand identity for the firm and creates consistency across all legal communications. Additionally, legal stationery often includes watermarks or other security features to prevent tampering or forgery, further enhancing the integrity and trustworthiness of the documents.In summary, printing the law office heading on legal stationery is a customary practice in the legal profession. It contributes to the professional image of the law firm, ensures consistency in branding, and helps maintain the security and authenticity of legal documents.
For more questions on the law office, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29731616
#SPJ8
What is the critique and effectiveness of Cyber Libel Law RA
10175 and Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code?
The criticism of Cyber Libel Law RA 10175 is centred on worries about the right to free speech and potential misuse of authority. Critics claim that it can be used to stifle internet conversation and silence criticism.
It is believed that the law's expansive definition of libel and the harsher punishments for online offences are excessive and restrict free speech. Similar criticisms have been levelled at Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code, which makes libel a crime. However, supporters contend that these regulations are important to preserve social order and protect people from internet libel. These laws' success is debatable and depends on how well they strike a balance between defending free speech and individual rights.
Learn more about Cyber Libel Law RA 10175 here:
https://brainly.com/question/20768284
#SPJ11
Replacement can be defined as
O converting term coverage to an individual whole life policy
O cash surrendering an existing policy
O accepting a reduced paid-up policy
O exchanging an existing policy for a new policy
66 of 75 Questions Remaining
Replacement can be defined a cash surrendering an existing policy. The second option is correct.
A guarantee is a commitment made to the purchaser of a decent by the merchant or producer of the great about the state of the item. On the off chance that the item isn't in sure condition or doesn't fill in as guaranteed than the party giving the guarantee need to fix or supplant the item up to a specific timeframe
The Earliest in, earliest out (FIFO) substitution strategy depends on the hypothesis that the best page to eliminate is the one that has been in memory the longest.This is generally utilized in working frameworks.A calculation programs the framework to supplant the most seasoned page when substitution should be finished.
Learn more about replacement:
https://brainly.com/question/26522529
#SPJ2
NEPA / CEQ Regulations: What is the main point of Part 1505?
***I do not need the whole regulation just the main point
Environmental impact statements (EIS) development and implementation are primarily addressed under Part 1505, which is a part of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) rules.
EIS documents are thorough evaluations of the probable environmental effects of proposed federal actions, and Part 1505 of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations specifies the requirements and procedures for their preparation. Part 1505's major goal is to make sure that federal agencies thoroughly analyse the environmental effects of their planned activities and take alternative options into account in order to minimise harmful environmental effects.
In conclusion, the NEPA/CEQ regulations' Part 1505 emphasises the significance of completing thorough environmental impact studies and taking into account options to reduce environmental impacts when federal agencies make decisions.
Learn more about Environmental impact statements here:
https://brainly.com/question/30606279
#SPJ11
(6)How can companies ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for
breaches of customary international law?
Companies can ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for breaches of customary international law by adhering to international legal standards and conducting thorough due diligence.
To mitigate the risk of lawsuits related to breaches of customary international law, companies should first familiarize themselves with the relevant international legal frameworks and norms. They should identify the specific customary international laws that apply to their operations, such as human rights, labor rights, and environmental protection. Once identified, companies should implement robust compliance programs that align with these standards.
A crucial step is conducting thorough due diligence throughout their supply chains and business operations. This includes assessing and monitoring potential risks, such as human rights abuses, environmental harm, or unethical practices. By identifying and addressing these risks proactively, companies can prevent or mitigate potential breaches of customary international law.
To know more about lawsuits
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
How did the conflict between Federalists and Republicans over the judiciary lead to a balance of power among political interests and different branches of government? Is it accurate to say that the Federalist Party continued to shape America for decades through the agency of John Marshall's Supreme Court?
By creating the notion of judicial review, the fight between Federalists and Republicans over the judiciary contributed to a balance of power between political interests and the other arms of government.
The Supreme Court's authority to interpret the Constitution and judge whether legislation are constitutional was asserted by the Federalists, who were led by Chief Justice John Marshall. This approach made guaranteed that the court acted as a check on the other branches' acts, preventing possible power abuses. The Federalist Party's viewpoints and interpretations of the Constitution persisted in shaping America's legal and political landscape for decades as a result of Marshall's significant decisions, such as in Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Gibbons v. Ogden.
Learn more about judicial here:
https://brainly.com/question/20214003
#SPJ11
What is the importance of Cyber Libel Law RA 10175 and Article
355 of the Revised Penal Code in the current ICT issues?
The potential of the Cyber Libel Law (Republic Act 10175) and Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code to handle and control offences linked to online defamation and malicious acts makes them significant in the context of current ICT (Information and Communication Technology) challenges.
Republic Act 10175, sometimes referred to as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, contains provisions pertaining to cyber libel. It attempts to shield people and organisations from false and damaging information spread through digital platforms and acknowledges the impact of online defamatory statements. The following are some critical considerations about the significance of cyberlibel law in modern ICT issues:
a. Defence against internet slander: As social media and the internet are used more often, there are more cases of online
Learn more about Article 355 here:
https://brainly.com/question/25133385
#SPJ11
Very specific and detailed rules that govern a large range of activities that could impact the natural environment, such as specific standards for construction of landfill sites, would be found in which of the following (from the command toolbox)?
Select one:
a. Environmental approvals
b. Policies and guidelines
c. Regulations
d. Administrative orders
comprehensive laws are frequently where one may find that control a variety of a the precise and Regulations are frequently that control a variety of actions that have an influence on the environment, such as requirements for building landfill sites.
Regulations are a type of legislation that has been specifically created to solve environmental issues and guarantee adherence to environmental protection measures. They are legally binding. They offer detailed instructions that must be followed in order to reduce harmful effects on the environment. By offering additional guidance and administrative procedures, environmental approvals, policies, and guidelines, as well as administrative orders, may be used to supplement regulations. However, it is the regulations themselves that contain the specific and detailed rules that govern activities affecting the natural environment.
Learn more about comprehensive laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/32522168
#SPJ11
FF company signed a contract to export goods to AA company in Africa. In september FF was notified of the L/C, but the money of account was different from that required by the sales contract. Besides, the goods were not ready for shipment.In November,AA urged FF to deliver the goods.FF requested an L/C amendment and an extension of the shipment date. The next day, AA cabled back, "L/C amended."FF shipped the goods.However, the amended L/C never arrived,and the opening bank refused to pay against the shipping documents.The goods were stored in the warehouse at the port of destination.FF had to pay much rent and insurance.At this time, AA requested D/A.Should FF accept it? Is there any lesson to be learnt from this case?
Due to the absence of the updated L/C and the opening bank's refusal to accept payment against the shipping documents, the FF business shouldn't grant AA's request for D/A (documents against acceptance).
This indicates that FF did not get paid for the products, and it would be dangerous to give the shipping paperwork to AA without first getting paid. Instead, prior to issuing the shipping documents, FF should ask AA for a confirmed and irrevocable L/C that complies with the sales contract.
The situation serves as a reminder of how crucial it is to properly check and confirm the L/C's provisions before sending the items in order to prevent disagreements and monetary losses.
Learn more about on shipping documents, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13307618
#SPJ1
QUESTION THREE [25]
The Constitution of 1996 enshrines the rights of all people within South Africa in relation to dignity and equality. The law further affirms the rights to freedom, religion expression, culture, association, and movement.
The Constitution commits government to take reasonable measures, within available means, to ensure that all South Africans have access to basic services.
3.1 By referring to the Constitution of 1996, comment on the features and characteristics of development local government and its importance in the provision of service. (15)
3.2. With practical examples provide a discussion on the relevance of local economic development. (10)
The 1996 Constitution mandates that local governments be developmental, which has significant ramifications for how services are provided in South Africa.
A style of local administration known as "developmental local government" aims to foster economic growth, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability through the delivery of essential services and the establishment of favourable conditions for regional economic growth.
According to the Constitution, the government is obligated to take reasonable steps, within its financial capacity, to guarantee that all South Africans have access to basic services, including water, sanitation, power, and housing.
Learn more about the Constitution, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30337690
#SPJ1
two things about "i've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck"
1. implying that nixon's denial of the watergate break in is hard to believe
2. attorney general mitchell would support nixon
The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.
The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.
Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.
To know more about Nixon's visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1131063
#SPJ11
ello dear Dr. subject is (introduction to sociology) please use your own words answer my questions.
Project: Main Sociological Theories
Create an infographic (using an infographic creator tool on Word or any other source) emphasizing the main elements of each of the three major sociological theories, Functionalism, Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interactionism.
Then, on a separate sheet, create a social media conversation among three different sociologists on the nature of society based on the theories above. One sociologist belongs to Functionalism, the second to Conflict Theory, and the third to Symbolic Interactionism.
Sociology is the scientific study of human society and social behavior. It is a branch of social science that examines the ways in which individuals interact with each other in society. Sociology aims to understand the social and cultural phenomena that shape our lives. It is divided into three major sociological theories, Functionalism, Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interactionism.
Functionalism is a theory that suggests that society is made up of different parts that work together to maintain social stability and order. It argues that each part of society plays a specific role and contributes to the overall function of society. Functionalists view society as a complex system with interdependent parts that work together to create a stable society.Conflict Theory, on the other hand, argues that society is made up of groups that are in constant conflict over resources and power. It suggests that the struggle for power and control over resources is the driving force behind social change. Conflict theorists view society as a battleground where different groups fight for control over resources and power.Symbolic Interactionism is a theory that suggests that individuals interact with each other through symbols, such as language and gestures. It argues that individuals create meaning through their interactions with others and that this meaning shapes their behavior. Symbolic Interactionists view society as a collection of individuals who create meaning through their interactions with each other.In the social media conversation among the three different sociologists, the Functionalist sociologist would argue that society is made up of different parts that work together to maintain social stability and order.
learn more about Sociology here;
https://brainly.com/question/12883412?
#SPJ11
Jesse James, a 20-year-old, was arrested for robbing a bank. As the officer who responded and caught the robber in the act, you are responsible for searching and arresting the suspect. You announce your presence and ask the robber to come out with his hands where you can see them. As you place him up against his car used to get to the bank for a pat-down, you note additional weapons on the seat of the car in plain view sight.
As the arresting officer, I would secure Jesse James, conduct a pat-down search, and seize the visible weapons for evidence.
As the responding officer, it is crucial to follow proper procedures when searching and arresting a suspect like Jesse James. After announcing my presence and instructing him to come out with his hands visible, I would approach him cautiously and conduct a pat-down search to ensure he is not armed or posing a threat. Discovering additional weapons on the seat of the car in plain view would raise concerns about the suspect's intent and potential danger. I would immediately secure the weapons and ensure the safety of the surrounding area. Subsequently, I would inform my fellow officers about the situation and request backup as needed. It is essential to handle the arrest with professionalism, ensuring the suspect's rights are protected while prioritizing public safety.For more such questions on Arresting officer:
https://brainly.com/question/13039208
#SPJ8
What is a mortgage? A. a document which makes property security for a debt B. the amount the borrower owes the lender C. the amount owed at the time of foreclosure D. evidence of debt
Answer:
B The amount the borrower owes to the lender.
A criminal statute, which is so vague or indefinite, that the courts have felt they are considered to be "void for vagueness," because they are essentially:
If a criminal statute is so ambiguous or imprecise that it fails to provide people fair notice of what behaviour is prohibited, it is ruled "void for vagueness" by the courts and violates their right to due process.
it difficult for people to understand what conduct may lead to criminal liability. The principle of "void for vagueness" is a legal concept that addresses this issue.When a criminal statute is so poorly defined or lacks clarity to the extent that it fails to provide individuals with fair notice of what behavior is prohibited, it may be deemed "void for vagueness." This means that the law is considered unconstitutional and unenforceable because it violates the due process rights of individuals.
The principle of fair notice is an essential aspect of the legal system. Laws should be written in a way
lean more about ambiguous here :
https://brainly.com/question/31273453
#SPJ11
what are the three levels of courts, starting from the level at which a criminal case is first heard?
Answer:
Explanation:
The three levels of courts, starting from the level at which a criminal case is first heard, vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system. However, in many common law jurisdictions, including the United States, the levels of courts are typically as follows:
Trial Courts (or Courts of First Instance): Trial courts are the lowest level of courts where criminal cases are initially heard and tried. These courts are responsible for receiving evidence, examining witnesses, and making determinations of guilt or innocence. Trial courts may have different names depending on the jurisdiction, such as district courts, superior courts, or circuit courts.
Appellate Courts (or Courts of Appeal): Appellate courts are the intermediate level of courts that review decisions made by the trial courts. They do not conduct new trials or re-examine the facts of the case. Instead, their main role is to review the legal arguments and procedures used in the trial court to determine if any errors occurred. Appellate courts can affirm, reverse, or modify the decisions made at the trial court level. They may be referred to as courts of appeals, appellate divisions, or appellate courts.
Supreme Court (or Court of Final Appeal): The Supreme Court is the highest level of court in the judicial system. It serves as the court of last resort and typically has the final authority to review and decide on legal issues. The Supreme Court's role is to provide final interpretations of laws and to ensure uniformity and consistency in legal principles within the jurisdiction. Not all countries have a Supreme Court, but in those that do, it is usually the highest court in the hierarchy.
It's important to note that the specific names and organization of courts may vary across different countries and legal systems. Additionally, some jurisdictions may have additional levels of specialized courts, such as family courts, constitutional courts, or administrative courts, which handle specific types of cases.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The Supreme Court has greatly reduced the applicability of the
_____ since its passage in _____.
a.
FAA, 1925
b.
AFA, 2009
c.
AFA, 2013
d.
FAA, 1926
e.
FAA, 1952
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 1925 is a U.S. federal law governing arbitration agreements. The Supreme Court has significantly limited its applicability since its enactment in 1925.
The Supreme Court has greatly reduced the applicability of the FAA, 1925 since its passage in 1925. This statement is true.What is the FAA 1925?The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 1925 is a United States federal law that governs arbitration agreements. This Act has been in force since 1925 and governs contracts in which the parties have agreed to settle disputes using arbitration. The Supreme Court has greatly reduced the applicability of the FAA, 1925 since its passage in 1925.
learn more about Federal here;
https://brainly.com/question/30366903?
#SPJ11