The number of coyotes found in certain state counties is decreasing at a rate of 4. 5% per year. A wildlife biologist recently counted 100 coyotes in one tri-county area. The biologist uses a function to model the population over time and then uses this model to predict the coyote population. Which function model did the biologist correctly use to predict when the population would be fewer than 50 in this tri-county area?
​

In one gram of substance 0.22 grams of nickel is present. Then the amount of nickel in the 35 grams of the substance is 7.7 grams.

A ratio is an ordered couple of numbers a and b, written as a/b where b can not equal 0. A proportion is an equation in which two ratios are set equal to each other.

A single gram of a certain metallic substance has 0.52 grams of copper and 0.26 grams of zinc.

The remaining portion of the substance is nickel.

Let the gram of nickel be x. Then we have

[tex]\sf x + 0.52 + 0.26 = 1[/tex]

[tex]\sf x = 0.22[/tex]

0.22 grams of nickel.

Ben estimated that 0.2 gram of nickel is in 1 gram of the substance.

He used this to estimate the amount of nickel in 35 grams of the substance.

Then we have

[tex]\sf \rightarrow35 \times 0.2 = 7[/tex]

We know that in 1 gram the amount of nickel is 0.22 gram. Then we have

[tex]\sf \rightarrow 35 \times 0.22 = 7.7[/tex]

The amount of nickel in the 35 grams of the substance is 7.7 grams.

More about the ratio and the proportion link is given below.

brainly.com/question/14335762

The function d(n) = 3^n-1 for n>2 generates the given geometric sequence.

The common ratio of the given geometric sequence is 3, which means that each term is obtained by multiplying the previous term by 3.

a(n)= 3^n for n>0 generates the sequence 3^1, 3^2, 3^3, 3^4, ... = 3, 9, 27, 81, ..., which is not the same as the given sequence.

b(n) = 3(3)^n for n>0 generates the sequence 3(3)^1, 3(3)^2, 3(3)^3, 3(3)^4, ... = 9, 27, 81, 243, ..., which is not the same as the given sequence.

c(n)= 3^n for n>2 generates the sequence 3^3, 3^4, 3^5, 3^6, ... = 27, 81, 243, 729, ..., which is not the same as the given sequence.

d(n) = 3^n-1 for n>2 generates the sequence 3^2, 3^3, 3^4, 3^5, ... = 9, 27, 81, 243, ..., which is the same as the given sequence starting from the third term.

Therefore, the function d(n) = 3^n-1 for n>2 generates the given geometric sequence.

To know more about geometric sequence, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13008517#

#SPJ11

Answer: A

a(n) = 3^n for n > 0

Step-by-step explanation: Khan

Answer: 2,506 people

Step-by-step explanation:

786 + 908 + 812 = 2,506 people

Taking the data into consideration, we can calculate and conclude that the temperature at midnight was -4, through the use of an equation.

According to the prompt, the temperature is now -7. We also know that, since midnight, the temperature tripled and then rose 5 degrees.If we let x be the temperature at midnight, then we can set up the following equation:

3x + 5 = -7

Subtracting 5 from both sides, we get:

3x = -12

Dividing by 3, we get:

x = -4

Therefore, the temperature at midnight was -4 degrees. With that in mind, we conclude we have correctly answered this question.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Answer:15)5760.1 6)78. 17)582.4 18)112

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 36 students in Ms. Oaks' class. The number of students who wear each type of item is: Glasses: 15 students, Earrings: 8 students, Hats: 4 students and Watch: 9 students

Let the total number of students in Ms. Oaks' class be x.

a) We know that 2/18 of the students wear hats, which is equivalent to 1/9 of the students. We are also told that 4 students wear hats. So, we can set up an equation:

1/9 * x = 4

Solving for x, we get:

x = 36

Therefore, there are 36 students in Ms. Oaks' class.

b) We can now use the information given to determine how many students wear each type of item.

- Glasses: 5/12 of the students wear glasses, which is equivalent to:

(5/12) * 36 = 15 students

- Earrings: 2/9 of the students wear earrings, which is equivalent to:

(2/9) * 36 = 8 students

- Hats: We are told that 4 students wear hats.

- Watch: 1/4 of the students wear a watch, which is equivalent to:

(1/4) * 36 = 9 students

Therefore, the number of students who wear each type of item is:

Glasses: 15 students

Earrings: 8 students

Hats: 4 students

Watch: 9 students

To know more about number, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12816397#

#SPJ11

a)The amount in the account after 5 years, compounded annually, will be approximately $60,625.06.

b) The amount in the account after 5 years, compounded semiannually, will be approximately $61,588.88.

The amount in the account after 5 years can be calculated using the compound interest formula. For an initial investment of $47,000 at an annual interest rate of 5%, compounded annually or semiannually, the amount in the account will be different.

(a) For compounding annually:

The compound interest formula is given by:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

where:

A = the amount after time t

P = principal amount (initial investment) = $47,000

r = annual interest rate = 5% or 0.05 (as a decimal)

n = number of times interest is compounded per year = 1 (since it is compounded annually)

t = time period = 5 years

Plugging in the given values, we get:

A = 47000(1 + 0.05/1)^(1*5)

A = 47000(1.05)^5

A ≈ $60,625.06

So, the amount in the account after 5 years, compounded annually, will be approximately $60,625.06.

(b) For compounding semiannually:

The only difference from the above calculation is the value of 'n', which is the number of times interest is compounded per year. In this case, 'n' will be 2, as interest is compounded semiannually (twice a year).

Plugging in the given values, we get:

A = 47000(1 + 0.05/2)^(2*5)

A = 47000(1.025)^10

A ≈ $61,588.88

So, the amount in the account after 5 years, compounded semiannually, will be approximately $61,588.88.

For more questions like Interest click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/13324776

#SPJ11

Using a table is similar to using a double number line because the relation between the corresponding would never change.

Given that,

To explain how using a table is similar to using a double number line and how it is different.

A number line is defined as the number marked on the line calibrated into an equal number of units. For example -1, 0, 1, and so on.

Here,

Let assuming some values, in tabulated form,

x     y

1     -1

2    -2

3    -3

Now calibrating the x and y in the number line

x =  1   2   3

     ----------

y = -1   -2  -3

     -----------

When comparing the corresponding relationship it remains the same, where it is a table or number line.

Thus, using a table is similar to using a double number line because the relation between the corresponding would never change.

Bob's minimum monthly credit card payment needs to be B) $129.00 to reach his dti goal of 36%.

Bob's total monthly debt payments are $1,947.00 ($1,250.00 mortgage + $349.00 auto loan + $348.00 credit cards). To achieve a dti ratio of 36%, his total monthly debt payments should be no more than $1,728.00 ($4,800.00 * 36%).

Therefore, he needs to reduce his monthly credit card payment by $219.00 ($1,947.00 - $1,728.00). Since his current minimum monthly credit card payment is $348.00, he needs to reduce it to d) $129.00 ($348.00 - $219.00) to reach his dti goal.

For more questions like Payment click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/15136793

#SPJ11

A) The point estimate for the proportion of all homeowners in the city who would support a ban on nonnatural lawn fertilizers is 0.297.

B) The 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all homeowners in the city who would support a ban on nonnatural lawn fertilizers is (0.266, 0.328).

A) The point estimate is the best estimate for the proportion of all homeowners in the city who would support a ban on nonnatural lawn fertilizers to protect fish in the local waterways. We can find this by taking the proportion of homeowners in the sample who said they would support a ban:

point estimate = x/n = 22/74 = 0.297

Therefore, the point estimate for the proportion of all homeowners in the city who would support a ban on nonnatural lawn fertilizers is 0.297.

B) The margin of error is ±3.1%. To find the lower and upper limits of the confidence interval, we can use the following formula:

lower limit = point estimate - margin of error

upper limit = point estimate + margin of error

Substituting the values we know, we get:

lower limit = 0.297 - 0.031 = 0.266

upper limit = 0.297 + 0.031 = 0.328

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all homeowners in the city who would support a ban on nonnatural lawn fertilizers is (0.266, 0.328).

learn more about "Proportion":- https://brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPJ11

The width of the swamp is 12 feet, and the length is 50 feet.

length is 10 less than 5 times its width. We can write that as:

Equation for length:

L = 5W - 10

We also know that the perimeter of the swamp is 124 feet. The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is:

Perimeter = 2(Length + Width)

So, we have:

124 = 2(L + W)

Now, we can substitute the expression for L from the first equation into the second equation:

124 = 2((5W - 10) + W)

Now, we can solve for W:

Step 2: solving for width

124 = 2(6W - 10)

62 = 6W - 10

72 = 6W

W = 12

Now that we have the width (W = 12 feet), we can find the length by plugging the width back into the equation for L:

Step 1: solving for length

L = 5W - 10

L = 5(12) - 10

L = 60 - 10

L = 50

So, the width of the swamp is 12 feet, and the length is 50 feet.

Read more on length and width here:https://brainly.com/question/15161439

#SPJ4

The swamp has a perimeter 124 feet the length L of the swamp is 10 less than 5 times it width What are the length and the width of the swamp

Frank needs to pay $233.10 for each installment.

To determine how much Frank still owes on the refrigerator after paying the down payment. We can subtract the down payment from the total cost of the refrigerator:

Total cost of refrigerator = $1036

Down payment = $103.60

Amount owed = Total cost of refrigerator - Down payment

Amount owed = $1036 - $103.60

Amount owed = $932.40

Next, we need to determine how much Frank will pay for each installment. Since he will pay the remaining balance in 4 equal installments, we can divide the amount owed by 4:

Amount owed = $932.40

Number of installments = 4

Amount per installment = Amount owed / Number of installments

Amount per installment = $932.40 / 4

Amount per installment = $233.10

Therefore, Frank needs to pay $233.10 for each installment to fully pay off the refrigerator. By breaking down the cost into smaller payments, Frank can manage his budget more effectively and avoid the burden of making a large payment all at once.

Learn more about refrigerator

brainly.com/question/13150661

#SPJ11

The analogy that best represents the bold letters for each question is related to relationships and cross-sections.

Some analogies are given below:

Explanation: The relationship between happy and sad is that they are opposite emotions.

Similarly, up and down are opposite directions, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between a cat and a kitten is that a kitten is a young cat.

Similarly, a puppy is a young dog, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between circle and sphere is that a circle is a two-dimensional shape, while a sphere is a three-dimensional shape that has a circular cross-section.

Similarly, a square is a two-dimensional shape, while a cube is a three-dimensional shape that has a square cross-section, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between the oven and baking is that an oven is a tool used to bake food.

Similarly, a grill is a tool used to grill food, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between mother and father is that they are the parents of a child.

Similarly, a daughter and a son are the children of their parents, so the analogy holds.

Explanation: The relationship between a book and a chapter is that a book is divided into chapters.

Similarly, a play is divided into acts, so the analogy holds.

To learn more about “analogy” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/13978016

#SPJ11

The first fraction is closer to 1, while the second fraction is closer to 17.

Let's first determine the value of the first fraction with a denominator of 4, which rounds to 1.

Since the fraction is less than 1 and rounds to 1, its numerator must be 3. Therefore, the first fraction is:

3/4 = 0.75

Now let's consider the second fraction, which has a denominator of 6 and the same numerator as the first fraction. So its value is:

3/6 = 1/2 = 0.5

To determine which fraction is closer to 1 or 17, we need to calculate the absolute difference between the value of each fraction and 1 or 17, and then compare those differences.

For the first fraction, the absolute difference between 0.75 and 1 is:

|1 - 0.75| = 0.25

The absolute difference between 0.75 and 17 is:

|17 - 0.75| = 16.25

For the second fraction, the absolute difference between 0.5 and 1 is:

|1 - 0.5| = 0.5

The absolute difference between 0.5 and 17 is:

|17 - 0.5| = 16.5

Therefore, the first fraction is closer to 1, while the second fraction is closer to 17.

Learn more about fraction;

brainly.com/question/729654

#SPJ4

The correct options are:

Option B:  The football is thrown from 6 feet off the ground.

when t = 0

h(t) = 6 * 75 * 0 + 16 * 0

= 6 feet

Option C : - 16t² represents the effect of gravity

we have

[tex]h = ut - \frac{1}{2}gt^2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}gt^2=-16t^2[/tex]

F. The vertex of the graph of h gives the maximum height of the foot

Read more on  functions here: https://brainly.com/question/10439235

#SPJ1

The doctor would prescribe 8 milliliters of acetaminophen for Jocelyn, who weighs 40 pounds.

According to the given information, pediatricians prescribe 5 milliliters (ml) of acetaminophen for every 25 pounds of a child's weight. So, if a child weighs 50 pounds, the doctor would prescribe 10 ml of acetaminophen.

Now, let's apply this formula to Jocelyn's weight. As Jocelyn weighs 40 pounds, we need to calculate how many 25-pound increments her weight contains. To do this, we can divide her weight by 25:

40 pounds ÷ 25 pounds = 1.6 increments

This means that Jocelyn's weight is equivalent to 1.6 times the 25-pound increment used in the prescription. To determine the amount of acetaminophen she needs, we can multiply 5 ml (the prescribed dose for 25 pounds) by 1.6:

5 ml × 1.6 = 8 ml

Know more about acetaminophen here:

https://brainly.com/question/14368060

#SPJ11

Answer:

60 x 120

Step-by-step explanation:

2x(x) = 7200

2[tex]x^{2}[/tex] = 7200  divide both sides by 2

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] = 3600

[tex]\sqrt{x^{2} }[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{3600}[/tex]

x = 60

This is one of the dimensions.  The other dimension is twice 60 or 120.

a = lw

a = (60)(12)

a = 7200

Helping in the name of Jesus.

The part of the figure marked ? is solved to be

113 degrees

The part of the circle marked by a question mark is solved using the relation as shown below

given angle formed by the tangents = 180 degrees - minor arc GE

information given in the problem includes

given angle formed by the tangents = 67 degrees

minor arc GE = ?

plugging in these values results to

67 degrees = 180 degrees - ?

rearranging the equation

? = 180 degrees - 67

? = 113

hence the required side is 113 degrees

Learn more about circle at

https://brainly.com/question/30385886

#SPJ1

The value of m∠Q as shown in the right-angled triangle below is 62.59°.

A right-angled triangle is a triangle, that has one of its interior angles equal to 90 degrees or any one angle is a right angle.

To calculate the value of m∠Q, we use the formula below

Formula:

Where:

Substitute these values into equation 1

Learn more about right-angle triangle here: https://brainly.com/question/31203729

#SPJ1

The answer to this given problem on convergent series can be D,E or F.

A series is said to be convergent when it approaches a certain value as the series approaches infinity.

A series is convergent (or converges) if the sequence

To use the Ratio Test, we must compute the limit L = lim (n→∞) |a_n+1 / a_n|.

For the given series a, where a_n = 1 - 2n - 4, we first find a_n+1:
a_n+1 = 1 - 2(n + 1) - 4 = 1 - 2n - 2 - 4 = -1 - 2n - 4.

Now, we compute the limit:

L = lim (n→∞) |(-1 - 2(n + 1) - 4) / (1 - 2n - 4)| = lim (n→∞) |(-1 - 2n - 6) / (1 - 2n - 4)| = lim (n→∞) |-2 / -2| = 1.

Since L = 1, the Ratio Test is inconclusive, so we cannot determine whether the series converges or diverges using this method alone. Therefore, the answer is either D, E, or F. To determine which of these options is true, another test or tests must be used.

To learn more about series convergence and divergence, visit https://brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

Answer:

I believe the answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

18 divided by 6 is 3, meaning y is constantly moving 3 spaces up as x moves to the right 1 on a graph.

The measurement which is closest to the number of miles between these two cities is 113 miles.

Given the distance between two cities is 180 kilometers.

If there are approximately 8 kilometers in 5 miles, we can use this conversion factor to convert 180 kilometers to miles, then one kilometer is approximately equal to 5/8 miles (0.625 miles).

To find the number of miles between the two cities, we can convert 180 kilometers to miles by multiplying by the conversion factor:

180 kilometers × (5/8 miles per kilometer) ≈ 112.5 miles = approximately 113 miles

Therefore, the closest measurement to the number of miles between these two cities is approximately 113 miles.

Know more about miles here:

https://brainly.com/question/25631156

#SPJ11

With probability 1, both machines are in the repair facility, and we move to state 2 (both machines working) two days later.

Let the state of the system be the number of machines working at the beginning of the day. We have two machines, so the state space is {0, 1, 2}.

Let the probability of transitioning from state i to state j be P(i,j).

To fill in the entries of the transition probability matrix, we need to consider the possible transitions between states.

If both machines are working at the beginning of the day (state 2):

If one machine is working at the beginning of the day (state 1):

If neither machine is working at the beginning of the day (state 0):

Putting this all together, we get the following transition probability matrix:

|   | 0        | 1        | 2        |

|---|----------|----------|----------|

| 0 | 0        | 0        | 1        |

| 1 | 1/3      | 2/3      | 0        |

| 2 | 1/9      | 4/9      | 4/9      |

For example, the entry in row 1 and column 2 represents the probability of transitioning from state 1 (one machine working) to state 2 (both machines working) and is 4/9.

Learn more about Machines

brainly.com/question/19089367

#SPJ11

Troy Engines, Limited, could use the freed capacity to launch a new product with a segment margin of $190,000 per year, the financial advantage of buying 19,000 carburetors from the outside supplier can be calculated as follows:

Total cost of producing 19,000 carburetors internally = $646,000
Cost of purchasing 19,000 carburetors from outside supplier = $30 x 19,000 = $570,000
Savings from purchasing carburetors from outside supplier = $646,000 - $570,000 = $76,000
Additional revenue from launching new product = $190,000

Therefore, the total financial advantage of buying 19,000 carburetors from the outside supplier and launching the new product would be $266,000 ($76,000 in savings plus $190,000 in additional revenue).

Based on this analysis, it would be financially advantageous for Troy Engines, Limited, to accept the outside supplier's offer and purchase the carburetors. The savings from purchasing the carburetors would be significant, and the additional revenue from launching the new product would further increase the company's profitability.

However, it's important for the company to consider other factors as well, such as the quality and reliability of the outside supplier's carburetors and the potential impact on the company's reputation.

to know more about Limited refer here

https://brainly.com/question/18008819#

#SPJ11

The solution to the  Linear equation is x = 1.5.

The math equation for the given problem is 15 - x = 7x + 3.

To solve this equation, first simplify it by combining like terms on one side of the equation.

15 - x - 7x = 3

Next, combine like terms on the left side of the equation.

15 - 8x = 3

Now, isolate the variable by subtracting 15 from both sides of the equation.

-8x = -12

Finally, solve for x by dividing both sides by -8.

x = 1.5

Therefore, the solution to the equation is x = 1.5.

To summarize, the linear equation 15 - x = 7x + 3, we simplify it by combining like terms. Subtracting x and 7x from both sides gives us 15 - 8x = 3. Next, we isolate the variable by subtracting 15 from both sides, resulting in -8x = -12.

Finally, we solve for x by dividing both sides by -8, giving us x = 1.5. This means that when we substitute x with 1.5 in the original equation, both sides will be equal. The solution x = 1.5 satisfies the equation and represents the value at which the equation is true.

To learn more about Linear equation go to :

https://brainly.com/question/11897796#

#SPJ11

Answer:40-45 percent

Step-by-step explanation:

explenation

The area of the picture of the flyer in the newspaper is 36 square inches.

The area of a figure is squared when the dimensions are multiplied by the scale factor k. Thus, if the scale factor of dilation is k, then the area of the new figure will be k² times the area of the original figure. In this case, the scale factor is 0.25, since the picture is a dilation with a scale factor of 1/4. Therefore, the area of the picture will be:

Area of picture = scale factor² x Area of original flyer

Area of picture = (0.25)² x Area of original flyer

= 0.0625 x 576 square inches

= 36 square inches

Therefore, the area of the picture of the flyer in the newspaper will be 36 square inches.

To know more about area visit:

brainly.com/question/13194650

#SPJ11

Our calculated t-value (-2.54) is beyond this critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the mean number of miles run per week by group runners and individual runners.

To test if there is a significant difference between the mean number of miles run each week by group runners and individual runners who are training for marathons, we can use a two-sample t-test.

Let's assume that the population standard deviation for the individual runners is also 4.2 miles per week.

We can set up the hypotheses as follows:

Null hypothesis: The mean number of miles run per week by group runners and individual runners is the same.

Alternative hypothesis: The mean number of miles run per week by group runners and individual runners is different.

Mathematically, we can write:

H0: μ1 = μ2

Ha: μ1 ≠ μ2

where μ1 is the population mean for group runners and μ2 is the population mean for individual runners.

We are given the sample mean for the group runners, which is 49.0 miles per week. We do not know the sample mean for the individual runners. Let's assume that we collect a random sample of 32 individual runners and find that their sample mean is 52.0 miles per week.

We can calculate the test statistic as follows:

t = (X1 - X2) / sqrt((s1^2/n1) + (s2^2/n2))

where X1 and X2 are the sample means for group runners and individual runners, s1 and s2 are the population standard deviations for group runners and individual runners, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes for group runners and individual runners.

Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (49.0 - 52.0) / sqrt((4.2^2/32) + (4.2^2/32))

t = -3.0 / 1.182

t = -2.54

Using a t-distribution table with 62 degrees of freedom (32 + 32 - 2), we can find that the critical value for a two-tailed test with a significance level of 0.05 is approximately ±2.0. Since our calculated t-value (-2.54) is beyond this critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the mean number of miles run per week by group runners and individual runners.

To learn more about null hypothesis visit: https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The inequality is 2.90h + 4.75 ≤ 39.55, and after solving, we find that Mario can afford to buy a maximum of 12 hamburgers (h ≤ 12).

Let's denote the number of hamburgers Mario can buy as h. We know that each hamburger costs $2.90, and the hamburger rolls cost $4.75. Mario has a total of $39.55 to spend. To write an inequality that represents this situation, we can use the following equation:

2.90h + 4.75 ≤ 39.55

Now, let's solve the inequality:

Step 1: Subtract 4.75 from both sides of the inequality to isolate the term with h.
2.90h ≤ 34.80

Step 2: Divide both sides of the inequality by 2.90 to solve for h.
h ≤ 34.80 / 2.90

Step 3: Perform the division to find the maximum number of hamburgers Mario can buy.
h ≤ 12

Know more about inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ11

Since 2 is greater than 1, it would have been faster for Daniel to swim directly to the campsite. Therefore, Daniel's sister is incorrect.

We can solve this problem using the formula for distance, rate, and time, which is:

distance = rate x time

Let's assume that Daniel swims at a rate of s feet per second and jogs at a rate of j feet per second. If he swims directly to the campsite, the distance he needs to cover is the distance d between the campsite and the boat ramp, which is 200 feet. If he swims to the boat ramp and then jogs to the campsite, he will need to cover the distance d twice, once while swimming and once while jogging. The total distance he will cover is 2d = 400 feet.

If Daniel swims directly to the campsite, the time it will take him to cover the distance is:

time1 = d/s

If he swims to the boat ramp and then jogs to the campsite, the time it will take him to cover the distance is:

time2 = d/s + d/j

To compare the two times, we can take their ratio:

time2/time1 = (d/s + d/j)/(d/s) = 1 + j/s

If this ratio is less than 1, then Daniel's sister is correct, and he would have arrived quicker by swimming to the boat ramp and then jogging. If the ratio is greater than 1, then it would have been faster for him to swim directly to the campsite.

Substituting d = 200, we get:

time2/time1 = 1 + j/s = 1 + (j/s)*(200/200) = 1 + (200j)/(ds)

Since Daniel arrives at the campsite out of breath from his swim and jog, we can assume that his rates of swimming and jogging are roughly equal. Let's assume s = j = r, where r is the common rate of swimming and jogging. Substituting this into the ratio, we get:

time2/time1 = 1 + (200r)/(dr) = 1 + 200/d

To determine if Daniel's sister is correct, we need to compare this ratio to 1. If time2/time1 is less than 1, then Daniel's sister is correct. If it is greater than 1, then it would have been faster for Daniel to swim directly to the campsite.

Substituting d = 200, we get:

time2/time1 = 1 + 200/200 = 2

Since 2 is greater than 1, it would have been faster for Daniel to swim directly to the campsite. Therefore, Daniel's sister is incorrect.

learn more about "Distance":- https://brainly.com/question/7243416

#SPJ11