Please provide three scenarios of contractual interpretation, each of which would result in a three potentially different contractual interpretations, depending on if the court used the four corners rule, the modern parole evidence rule, or the California parole evidence rule.

Mary's business as a personal trainer has both advantages and disadvantages. She has full legal authority in the decision-making.

Some of the advantages are:

Some of the disadvantages are:

As the sole proprietor of her business, Mary has full legal authority and autonomy to make all decisions regarding her business operations, including strategic planning, financial management, and customer relationships, without requiring approval from others.

Thus, Mary's way of business has its own pros and cons, while she is having full legal control overall.

Learn more about legal authority here:

https://brainly.com/question/32411416

#SPJ1

Employment contracts outline both employers' and employees' rights and responsibilities. They outline the conditions of employment, including the start and end dates as well as the hours worked, pay, and perks.

Termination by Mutual Agreement: In some circumstances, the employer and employee may decide to end a contract mutually. Negotiations, severance payments, or settlement agreements may be necessary.

At-Will Employment: There is a concept of "at-will" employment in nations like the United States, where either the employer or employee may terminate the work relationship at any time, with or without cause, provided that it does not contravene any other laws (for example, anti-discrimination laws).

Notice Requirements: A number of employment laws stipulate that both parties must provide notice before ending an employment agreement. Observation period.

Learn more about Employment Contracts here:

https://brainly.com/question/24191862

#SPJ11

Both the Cyber Libel Law (RA 10175) and Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code deal with several facets of libel, although there are some significant distinctions:

The key elements of the Cyber Libel Law (RA 10175) are:

The scope of RA 10175 is limited to libel committed online, including on social media, the internet, and other online platforms.

Legal jurisdiction: The law is applicable to crimes committed inside the Philippines or wherever the computer system is located.

Penalties: When compared to traditional libel, cyberlibel entails harsher penalties. Those found guilty under RA 10175 may be sentenced to between six months and twelve years in prison as well as penalties.

According to RA 10175, libel encompasses any unlawful or forbidden conduct carried out through a computer system or other electronic device.

Learn more about Article 355 here:

https://brainly.com/question/25133385

#SPJ11

International agreements have the same weight as laws (statutes) in Turkey. International agreements that have been ratified by the Turkish Grand National Assembly are considered to be part of Turkish law and to have the force of law.

The Turkish Constitution's Article 90 enshrined this principle. Therefore, in Turkey's hierarchy of standards, international treaties and national legislation are on the same level. They are enforceable before national courts and have personal force. However, if a subsequent statute conflicts with an international treaty, the latter takes precedence under the tenet of lex posterior derogat legi priori (latest law prevails over earlier law).

Learn more about International agreements here:

https://brainly.com/question/30093431

#SPJ11

The control procedure that would best prevent fraud is proper authorization. The concept behind segregation of duties in establishing internal control is that duties of middle-level managers of the company should be clearly separated from those of top executives.

Internal control is defined as the organizational policies and procedures put in place to ensure the achievement of management objectives. Segregation of duties (SOD) is an essential internal control principle that aids in preventing fraud, ensuring accuracy, and the ethical application of assets and information. A successful internal control system will have a strong foundation built on this principle. This answer will examine the control procedures that are useful for preventing fraud and explain the concept behind segregation of duties.

The control procedures that are useful for preventing fraud includes; Proper Authorization: This control procedure involves the approval of all transactions, payments, and other financial activities by individuals who have the necessary authority. Any transaction that is not appropriately authorized should not be processed. Using Budgets: Budgets are an effective tool for preventing fraud. The budgeting process serves as an internal control by ensuring that all transactions are subject to review and approval.

Audits: Audits are also useful for preventing fraud. Audits involve an independent examination of an organization's financial records. The primary goal of audits is to identify financial errors, irregularities, and fraudulent activities. Reconciliations: Reconciliations are used to match account balances to ensure that all transactions are accounted for and that there are no errors or discrepancies. The control procedure that would best prevent fraud is proper authorization.The concept behind segregation of duties in establishing internal control is that duties of middle-level managers of the company should be clearly separated from those of top executives. SOD divides key tasks and responsibilities amongst different individuals to prevent fraud, abuse, and errors. Middle-level managers and top executives must be separated from one another to minimize the risk of fraudulent activity.

To know more about Segregation of duties visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31782416

#SPJ11

The party who suffered the harm brings the suit in a civil case, but a criminal case is always brought by the government. A civil case is a legal proceeding where one individual or entity sues another for compensation or an order to do something.

The purpose of a civil lawsuit is to compensate the plaintiff (the party bringing the case) for damages or other losses suffered as a result of the defendant's actions.The plaintiff may be seeking monetary damages, such as compensation for medical bills or lost wages, or non-monetary damages, such as an order to stop the defendant from engaging in certain activities. In a civil case, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving their case by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning that it is more likely than not that the defendant is responsible for the harm that occurred.

On the other hand, a criminal case is brought by the government, typically through a prosecutor, to punish someone who has committed a crime against society. The purpose of a criminal trial is to determine whether the defendant is guilty of the crime and to impose a punishment if they are found guilty. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and the government bears the burden of proving their case beyond a reasonable doubt. The punishment for a criminal offense may include imprisonment, fines, or other penalties, depending on the severity of the crime committed.

To know more about civil lawsuit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12190021

#SPJ11

Criminal law and civil law are both part of the legal system in the United States. Criminal law and civil law differ in the following ways: Criminal law deals with cases where people have committed crimes or violated public laws, while civil law deals with cases where one party believes that the other party has caused harm or injury.

In criminal law, the state takes legal action against the offender, while in civil law, the aggrieved party takes legal action against the wrongdoer. Criminal law is designed to prevent and punish people who break the law, while civil law deals with disputes and focuses on compensation. Criminal law has many different levels of punishment, including probation, imprisonment, fines, and even death, depending on the severity of the crime. On the other hand, civil law has only one level of punishment, which is compensation. Criminal law has been set up to collect compensation since the Norman invasion, while only civil law can sentence lawbreakers to prison.

Civil law deals with private rights and remedies, while criminal law deals with offenses that threaten the safety and security of society as a whole.

To know more about Criminal law  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28484602

#SPJ11

The details and scope of Armeen's insurance policy would determine Liberty State's obligation in this situation. The sum of Armeen's insurance coverage, $1.5 million, appears to be Liberty State's potential financial responsibility based on the information offered.

The legal principle that could result in Liberty State's liability is "bad faith." The need to act in good faith and fairly towards their insured parties is known as the "duty of good faith and fair dealing" in insurance law. When responsibility is logically obvious, part of this duty is to swiftly and reasonably resolve disputes within the policy's limitations. In the event when an insurance provider unreasonable refuses to settle a claim within the policy limitations, exposing the insured party to a bigger.

Learn more about Armeen's insurance policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/32498992

#SPJ11

The decision to warn third parties is complex and requires careful consideration of the situation to avoid negative repercussions.

When it comes to the requirement of helping professionals to warn third parties of threats, some conflicts might arise. Here are some of the conflicts involved in requiring helping professionals to warn third parties of threats. Confidentiality: One of the conflicts that arise is confidentiality. As helping professionals, they are expected to keep the information provided by clients confidential. However, the requirement to warn third parties about threats could lead to breaching confidentiality. Hence, they find it difficult to balance between protecting the client’s privacy and ensuring public safety.  Therefore, the requirement to warn third parties could impact the therapeutic relationship. Negative repercussions: Some helping professionals are not comfortable with the requirement to warn third parties of threats because of potential negative repercussions. Finally, the requirement to warn third parties could lead to conflicts when the warning is ignored. There are cases where warning signs were ignored by third parties or were not taken seriously, leading to negative consequences. Hence, it raises the question of what the helping professional could have done differently or whether it was right to warn third parties in the first place. In conclusion, the conflicts involved in requiring helping professionals to warn third parties of threats range from mistrust to breaching confidentiality.

Learn more about  warn third parties here:

https://brainly.com/question/3246740

#SPJ11

The international legal system encompasses a variety of basic concepts and processes. Some of the basic concepts and processes of the international legal system include the following:

The sources of international law: International law is derived from a variety of sources, including international treaties and agreements, customary international law, and general principles of law recognized by civilized nations.

The subjects of international law: The subjects of international law include sovereign states, international organizations, individuals, and non-state actors.

The basic principles of international law: The basic principles of international law include sovereignty, state responsibility, the prohibition of the use of force, the peaceful settlement of disputes, the principle of non-intervention, and the principle of non-discrimination.

Dispute settlement: Disputes between states are settled through a variety of means, including negotiations, mediation, and arbitration.

The role of international courts and tribunals: International courts and tribunals are responsible for the interpretation and application of international law in a variety of areas, including human rights, trade, and the law of the sea.

The implementation of international law: The implementation of international law is carried out through a variety of means, including the enforcement of judgments and decisions of international courts and tribunals, as well as through the exercise of diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions.

For more such answers

https://brainly.com/question/32314371

#SPJ8

A shortage of thyroxine means that the body does not produce enough of this hormone.

Thyroxine is an important hormone produced by the thyroid gland that plays a role in regulating the body's metabolism. It is responsible for controlling how quickly the body uses energy and how it produces proteins. A shortage of thyroxine can lead to a condition known as hypothyroidism, which can cause symptoms such as fatigue, weight gain, and sensitivity to cold temperatures. Hypothyroidism occurs when the thyroid gland produces too little thyroxine. This can happen due to a variety of factors, including autoimmune diseases, surgical removal of the thyroid gland, or radiation treatments.

Learn more about  thyroxine here:

https://brainly.com/question/13081186

#SPJ11

Several actions are deemed illegal under New Jersey mortgage regulations. Several instances include:

 Equity skimming: Obtaining a mortgage loan or changing the ownership of a property with the goal of earning rent or sales proceeds without paying the mortgage.2. Making false statements: Doing so in connection with a mortgage loan application or related documents by supplying false information or making false statements.Equity skimming and making false statements are two examples of fraudulent activities related to mortgage loans. Here's a brief explanation of each:Making false statements: This fraudulent activity involves providing false information or making false statements during the mortgage loan application process or related documentation. Individuals attempting to obtain a mortgage loan may provide inaccurate details about their income, assets, employment history, or other financial information in order to qualify for a loan they would otherwise be ineligible for. This misrepresentation of information can lead to loan approval based on false premises, potentially causing financial harm to the lender and distorting the mortgage market.

learn more about Several actions  here :

https://brainly.com/question/1920992

#SPJ11

The exception to the rule that the Biosafety Protocol requires strict advanced informed agreement procedures be applied to GMO seeds, plants, live fish and other organisms that are intentionally introduced into the environment is "the movement of GMOs is not likely to have an adverse effect on the conservation, taking into account risks to human health."

Explanation:

According to the Biosafety Protocol, the advanced informed agreement procedure (AIA) is required for living modified organisms (LMOs) that are intentionally introduced into the environment. An exception to this rule is when the movement of GMOs is not likely to have an adverse effect on the conservation, taking into account risks to human health.The WTO's Agreements do not allow the concept of the precautionary principle. Rather, for an importing country to block a shipment of GMO products, it must rely on science, which is codified in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement (SPS).According to the GEO 3 report, which is a UN Environment Program report on the global environment, the 3 pillars of sustainable development are economic needs, environmental needs, and social needs. Legal rights are not one of the 3 pillars of sustainable development.

Therefore, the correct answer is: the movement of GMOs is not likely to have an adverse effect on the conservation, taking into account risks to human health. Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement (SPS)Legal Rights.

To know more about Biosafety Protocol visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/10102225

#SPJ11

In general, when the content is loaded, the party who should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney is the purchaser.

The purchaser should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney in order to verify the amount of liability that could be imposed on the purchaser due to the ongoing litigation or claim.Here is a 250-worded detailed answer:When a property is being sold, the seller's attorney usually issues an estoppel certificate that verifies the legal status of the property.

If there is any litigation or claims ongoing, this certificate will include any pending legal or financial issues that could affect the property's value or future liabilities.The estoppel certificate should be read carefully, and if there is any ongoing litigation, a letter should be requested from the client's attorney regarding litigation, claims, and assessments that could affect the property's value or future liabilities.

The party who should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney when content is loaded is the purchaser. This is because the purchaser is the one who will be responsible for any future liabilities of the property. By requesting this letter, the purchaser will be able to verify the amount of liability that could be imposed on them due to the ongoing litigation or claim.The letter from the client's attorney should include details about any pending litigation or claims against the property, any assessments or taxes that are due or may become due, and any other financial or legal issues that could affect the property's value or future liabilities.In conclusion, when content is loaded, the purchaser should request a letter regarding litigation, claims, and assessments from the client's attorney. This will help them verify the amount of liability that could be imposed on them due to the ongoing litigation or claim.

To know more about litigation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15284945

#SPJ11

The difference in assessing the dangers to American freedom can be demonstrated by the fact that the two groups may have different criteria for what they consider to be a threat to American freedom.

One group may believe that a lack of economic opportunity is the greatest danger to American freedom, while another may see government intervention in the market as the greatest threat.The two differ in assessing the dangers to American freedom by their perspectives on what constitutes a threat to American freedom. They may disagree on what qualifies as a threat, how severe it is, and what should be done about it. Different individuals and groups may have different criteria for assessing the dangers to American freedom, and may prioritize different factors or issues. Therefore, different groups may come to different conclusions about what the most significant dangers to American freedom are, and how best to address them.

To know more about  intervention , visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/31580264

#SPJ11

Once a plaintiff determines that she has standing to sue and has chosen the proper court in terms of jurisdiction, she must serve the defendant with a summons and complaint to put the defendant on notice of the suit. The defendant must then submit his answer to the court and indicate any defenses that justify his actions.

After establishing standing to sue and selecting the appropriate court, the plaintiff is responsible for serving the defendant with a summons and complaint. The summons formally notifies the defendant of the lawsuit and the need to respond. The complaint outlines the specific claims and allegations against the defendant.

Upon receiving the summons and complaint, the defendant must respond by submitting his answer to the court within the specified timeframe. In the answer, the defendant addresses the plaintiff's claims and can raise various defenses to justify his actions. Common defenses may include asserting that the plaintiff lacks sufficient evidence, arguing the statute of limitations has expired, or claiming a legitimate legal justification for the defendant's conduct.

To know more about plaintiff

brainly.com/question/32362772

#SPJ11

The  Double Jeopardy and Habeas Corpus are two distinct legal concepts that have no relation to each other.

Both habeas corpus and double jeopardy are legal notions having distinct functions in the criminal justice system. An explanation of each follows :Double jeopardy is a legal principle that prevents someone from being prosecuted for the same crime twice after they have previously been either guilty or acquitted. This protection is guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United reads Constitution, which reads, "nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." Double jeopardy essentially stops the government from bringing additional cases against the same defendant for the same offence, protecting people from harassment or multiple sentences for the same conduct.

A legal word known as "habeas corpus" translates to.

Learn more about  Habeas Corpus here:

https://brainly.com/question/29748417

#SPJ11

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was developed in 1982, which deals with ocean-related issues. The Convention specifically addresses the environment, by adopting the language of Stockholm Declaration 21 to mandate that: States be obligated to protect and preserve the marine environment. The correct answer is: States be obligated to protect and preserve the marine environment.

What is the Convention on the Law of the Sea?

UNCLOS, also known as the Law of the Sea Convention, is a treaty that was developed by the United Nations in 1982. It governs all ocean-related activities, from the natural resources that are present in the waters to the movement of ships and vessels on the high seas.It is the most extensive treaty on marine law, and it regulates all matters related to the oceans. UNCLOS provides a universal framework for ocean governance, encouraging all nations to act cooperatively in the oceans.

To know more about Convention  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28464011

#SPJ11

CBSA (Canada Border Services Agency) policy on articles imported by or for universities is  D10-14-15.  Hence, Option (A) is correct.

This policy provides guidelines and regulations regarding the customs procedures and exemptions applicable to articles imported by or for universities. It outlines the conditions, documentation requirements, and duty-free provisions for educational institutions

Universities should refer to this specific policy document, D10-14-15, to ensure compliance with CBSA  regulations and to understand the procedures and privileges associated with importing articles for academic purposes.

Thus, it is essential for universities to consult this policy for accurate information on customs procedures and exemptions related to their specific circumstances.

Learn more about customs exemption here:

https://brainly.com/question/32194751

#SPJ1

The Clean Water Act is a law that allows the EPA to monitor point sources of pollution. So, the FIRST option is accurate.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) is a federal law in the United States that grants the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to regulate and protect the quality of surface waters. One of the key provisions of the CWA is the authorization for the EPA to monitor point sources of pollution. Point sources refer to specific, identifiable sources of pollution, such as industrial facilities or wastewater treatment plants, that discharge pollutants into water bodies.

Through the CWA, the EPA establishes and enforces regulations to control and reduce the pollution discharged from point sources. This includes setting permit requirements, establishing water quality standards, and monitoring compliance with those standards. The EPA's monitoring activities under the CWA aim to ensure that point sources are operating within the prescribed limits and taking necessary measures to protect water quality.

To know more about Clean Water Act

brainly.com/question/30304869

#SPJ11

The characteristic that is not a feature of a political party is a lack of an organizational structure.

A political party is a group of people who come together with the same objective and goal of achieving political power and governing a country or a region. A political party is an organization that consists of people who share the same political beliefs and ideology and who come together to contest elections to secure a position in the government or to form a government. Political parties are an integral part of a democratic system as they offer citizens an opportunity to have a say in the governance of their country by choosing representatives who will speak on their behalf. A political party has the following characteristics: 1. Membership - A political party must have members who subscribe to the same ideology and beliefs.2. Organizational structure - A political party must have an organizational structure that ensures the effective running of the party.3. Manifesto - A political party must have a manifesto that outlines the policies and plans of the party if they come to power.4. Contest elections - A political party must contest elections to gain power or to have representation in the government.

Learn more about  political party here:

https://brainly.com/question/29550422

#SPJ11

Introduction:In this presentation, the topic of discussion is Consumer Protection. The presentation has been designed for a Class who is studying a course entitled "Introduction to Law."The Consumer Protection Act (CPA) of 1986 was enacted to safeguard consumer rights and to promote consumer welfare in India.

Consumers have been given several rights under the act to help them safeguard their interests. The following topics will be covered in the presentation.Double ticketing:The act prohibits double ticketing, which refers to a situation where goods or services are sold at two different prices to different people. The first price is the actual price, while the second price is higher and is charged to the unaware customers. It's critical to investigate the MRP (Maximum Retail Price) of any commodity or service to avoid being duped.Protection against faulty goods:The act provides that consumers can file a complaint against sellers or manufacturers for selling defective or faulty goods. The consumer can either file a complaint with the concerned consumer forum or the commission, depending on the amount of compensation claimed.The Right to Choose:The act grants consumers the right to choose what they want to buy or use. Consumers have the right to choose based on their preferences and budgets, and no one can coerce them to buy or use a particular product or service. The right to choose is a fundamental consumer right that protects them from dishonest vendors.Product recall:If a product poses a threat to the consumer's health or safety, the seller must recall it from the market. They must notify the consumer, as well as the relevant government authorities, of the recall. The seller must repair, replace, or refund the price of the product as compensation.

learn more about presentation here;

https://brainly.com/question/14028502?

#SPJ11

Social media has both positive and negative impacts on the constitutional right to freedom of expression.

Social Media provides a platform for individuals to share diverse perspectives and challenge traditional power structures. It enables the rapid dissemination of information, facilitating social and political mobilization.

However, social media also poses challenges such as the spread of misinformation, online harassment, and filter bubbles. Finding a balance between freedom of expression and addressing these issues is crucial.

It requires responsible moderation by social media platforms, the establishment of legal frameworks that protect individuals while preserving free speech and promoting media literacy to navigate the vast online landscape.

Thus, social media's impact on the constitutional right to freedom of expression​ has its pros and cons.

Learn more about Social media here:

https://brainly.com/question/30194441

#SPJ1

Gender sentencing laws were responsible for the incarceration of women for the crime of prostitution. In the past, gender sentencing laws were the reason behind the incarceration of women for certain crimes. Prostitution is an example of a crime where women were disproportionately targeted.

The gender sentencing laws led to the imprisonment of women for engaging in prostitution. This crime was perceived as an offense against social norms and moral values. Since women are believed to be more responsible for these values, they were held more responsible for this offense as compared to men. This belief also made it difficult for women to defend themselves in court as it was assumed that they had violated the moral and social code of conduct of the society. In addition to this, the gender sentencing laws were also responsible for incarcerating women for other crimes such as theft, drug abuse, and other similar crimes. However, the impact of these laws was most severe on women who were involved in prostitution. The enforcement of these laws led to the confinement of women in prisons and made it difficult for them to access social, educational, and economic opportunities.

Learn more about sentencing laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/4292707

#SPJ11

The differences  between the following contracts, Terms, consideration, performance, breach, damages, remedies, bilateral vs. unilateral, written vs. oral, performance, breach, etc.:

a ticket with a number assigned to it that is given by a valet parking attendant or given out by a robotic dispenser at the entry to a parking garage.

a standard contract offered to customers of cellphone providers or credit card account holders by banks.

the verbal conversation that occurs when a waiter accepts your dinner order at a restaurant.

a written agreement, such as a lease for office space.

Learn more about consideration here:

https://brainly.com/question/32361853

#SPJ11

The Minimum stay criteria are the rules established by hotels or other places of lodging that outline the minimum number of nights a visitor must spend in order to reserve a specific room or package.

For instance, a hotel might impose a minimum stay of two nights on weekends or at popular times of the year. By restricting brief stays or last-minute reservations, this policy aids hotels in increasing occupancy and revenue. b) Stay through: A stay through control calls for visitors to remain continuously for a predetermined amount of time without any breaks or check-outs.

learn more about criteria here :

https://brainly.com/question/15631897

#SPJ11

When a mental health patient is unable to participate in the decision-making process regarding his or her own care, the legal tool that is used is called a healthcare proxy.

A healthcare proxy is a legal tool that is used when a person is unable to participate in the decision-making process regarding his or her own care. It is a legal document that enables an individual to appoint another person to make healthcare decisions for them when they are unable to do so themselves. A healthcare proxy is important for individuals who are incapacitated due to mental health issues or physical disabilities. It is also important for individuals who are facing the end of life and want to ensure that their wishes are respected regarding medical treatment and end-of-life care.

Learn more about healthcare proxy here:

https://brainly.com/question/7742017

#SPJ11

Supreme Court: As the top court in the legal system, it interprets the Constitution and oversees the consistency of federal law.

The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority within a particular legal jurisdiction. It serves as the final appellate court, meaning that it has the power to review and make final decisions on appeals from lower courts, including appellate courts and district courts. The Supreme Court generally focuses on legal issues and questions of law rather than re-examining the facts of a case. Its primary function is to ensure the uniform and consistent interpretation and application of the law within the jurisdiction. The decisions of the Supreme Court set legal precedents that guide future rulings and shape the legal landscape of the jurisdiction.

learn more about consistency here :

https://brainly.com/app/ask

#SPJ11

There are a few reasons why the NPM government may be able to provide the COVID-19 vaccine in a short amount of time, while others may not like a strong track record and better incentive.

The NPM government has a strong track record of vaccine development and production. The country has a well-established pharmaceutical industry and a strong research base in vaccine development.

This means that the NPM government has the expertise and resources needed to develop and produce a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine in a relatively short amount of time.

The NPM government has a large population, it means that there is a large potential market for a COVID-19 vaccine. This gives the NPM government a strong incentive to develop and produce a vaccine as quickly as possible.

Thus, the NPM government has a higher chance of providing the covid vaccine in a short amount of time, while the others don't.

Learn more about Covid vaccine here:

https://brainly.com/question/30817508

#SPJ1

The following option that includes a provision that requires public companies to set policies to allow executive political party compensation to be taken back if it was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards is d.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a federal law that was implemented by Congress in 2010 in response to the global financial crisis of 2008. The law consists of 16 sections, each of which seeks to enhance the transparency and accountability of financial markets, minimize systemic risk, and enhance consumer protection. It is one of the most significant financial regulatory reforms in the United States since the Great Depression.The Dodd-Frank Act contains many provisions, including executive compensation clawback rules, which require publicly traded firms to recover executive compensation that was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards. The Act also contains provisions that seek to strengthen the U.S. financial system's transparency and accountability.

Learn more about  political party here:

https://brainly.com/question/30901480

#SPJ11