Answer:
Explanation:
Why did the European age of exploration matter?
The European Age of Exploration, which occurred during the 15th and 16th centuries, marked a significant turning point in world history. It enabled European countries to expand their territories and establish overseas colonies, which provided access to new resources and markets. This, in turn, led to the development of global trade networks and increased economic interdependence between nations. The Age of Exploration also led to the exchange of new ideas, technologies, and goods between Europe, Africa, and the Americas, transforming the way people lived, worked, and interacted with each other.
What was the human cost of European exploration and colonization?
The human cost of European exploration and colonization was significant and included the forced displacement, enslavement, and exploitation of indigenous populations. European powers often used violence and coercion to take control of land and resources, which resulted in the displacement and marginalization of native peoples. Additionally, the transatlantic slave trade, which lasted for over four centuries, led to the forced migration of millions of Africans to the Americas, where they were subjected to brutal and dehumanizing conditions. The impact of European exploration and colonization on native populations was devastating and continues to be felt today.
the radicalism of the sa worried the more conservative groups that had helped make hitler chancellor, so in a bid to curtail the sa on the night of june 30, 1934, more than a thousand high-ranking sa officials, including several of hitler's oldest associates, were executed in a bloody purge known as
More moderate gatherings that had helped choose Hitler as chancellor were worried about the SA's radicalism, so on June 30, 1934, a horrendous cleanse known as Night of Long Knives saw the execution of north of 1,000 high-positioning SA authorities, including a few of Hitler's most seasoned partners.
Adolf Hitler, the head of the Nazi party, orders his very own horrendous cleanse of ideological groups in Germany. He kills many Nazis he thinks could become political foes later on.
The evening of the Log Blades brought about the low killing of 400 individuals, including the past chancellor, a Nazi with comparative beliefs to Rohm, and 150 significant SA members.
Learn more about Night of Long Knives:
https://brainly.com/question/2358196
#SPJ4
Which nation began rearming around the same time that radio became a common technology?
a. Hitlers Germany
b. Churchill's Britain
c. De Gaulle's Grance
d. Victor Emmanuel's Italy
Hitler's Germany began rearming around the same time that radio became a common technology. The correct option is a.
The nation that began rearming around the same time that radio became a common technology was Hitler's Germany. After World War I, Germany was forced to disarm, and its military capabilities were severely limited by the Treaty of Versailles. However, the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in the 1930s led to a shift in Germany's foreign and military policy. Hitler began to rearm Germany in secret, expanding its military capabilities and developing new technologies, such as tanks and aircraft.
At the same time, radio technology was becoming more widely available, and Hitler recognized its potential for propaganda and spreading his message to the German people. The Nazi Party used radio broadcasts to promote their ideology and control the narrative, creating a powerful tool for influencing public opinion and consolidating power.
As Germany rearmed and expanded its military, it became increasingly aggressive in its foreign policy, leading to the outbreak of World War II. The combination of rearmament and propaganda through radio played a significant role in the rise of Hitler's regime and the eventual global conflict that followed.
In contrast, Churchill's Britain, De Gaulle's France, and Victor Emmanuel's Italy were not rearming at the same level or pace as Germany during this period. Britain was focused on naval power, while France and Italy were dealing with economic and political instability.
To learn more about Hitler's Germany refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12662121
#SPJ11
in Europe during the 1930s several national leaders in order to preserve peace at any cost agreed to the demands of an aggressor this policy was referred to as
Answer:
The policy that was referred to as "appeasement" was a diplomatic strategy adopted by several national leaders in Europe during the 1930s in order to preserve peace at any cost. This policy was particularly aimed at meeting the demands of aggressive nations such as Nazi Germany, which sought to expand its territory and power through military conquest. The policy of appeasement involved making concessions to such aggressors in the hope of preventing conflict and maintaining peace. However, this policy ultimately failed as it only emboldened the aggressive nations, allowing them to gain more power and influence. The failure of the policy of appeasement ultimately led to the outbreak of World War II, which was one of the deadliest conflicts in human history.
Answer: appeasement
Explanation:
This is called appeasement because it is k, just know I'm right!!
What percentage of the southern population must take an oath of loyalty to be able to be represented in congress? Why did you choose that
number?
The Wade-Davis Reconstruction Bill required that a majority i.e. 50% of the adult white male population in the southern states must take an oath of loyalty to be readmitted to the Union after the Civil War.
The Wade-Davis Reconstruction Bill was a plan proposed by Radical Republicans in the US Congress in 1864, as an alternative to President Abraham Lincoln's more lenient Reconstruction policies. The bill required that a majority i.e. 50% of the adult white male population in the southern states must take an oath of loyalty to the Union before a state could be readmitted to the Union.
This was a more stringent requirement than Lincoln's Ten Percent Plan, which only required a small percentage of voters to take a loyalty oath. The Wade-Davis Bill also called for the establishment of new state governments in the South, with black suffrage guaranteed, and the disqualification of former Confederate leaders from holding office. However, Lincoln pocket-vetoed the bill, arguing that it was too harsh and that it would make it more difficult to restore the Union.
---------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
'What were the requirements for southern population that must take an oath of loyalty to be readmitted to the Union after the Civil War for the Wade-Davis Reconstruction Bill?'-------------
To know more about oath of loyalty, click here
https://brainly.com/question/30462394
#SPJ1
Ancient Egyptians were blank which ment they belevend in many gods
Ancient Egyptians were polytheistic which meant they believed in many gods.
Their religion was centered around the idea of maintaining balance in the world through offerings and rituals to the gods. Each god represented a different aspect of life and had their own stories and myths associated with them.
The most famous gods include Ra, the sun god; Isis, the goddess of magic; and Osiris, the god of the afterlife.
The pharaoh was also considered a god-king and acted as a mediator between the people and the gods. Religion played a significant role in ancient Egyptian society and was intertwined with everyday life.
To know more about polytheistic click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30764001#
#SPJ11
What is one way specialization allowed the Romans to maintain a diverse empire?
A. Romans conquered other civilizations and made them conform to their ways.
B. Romans learned about new cultures through trading with other civilizations.
C. Rome was the only place where grapes were produced for trade.
D. Rome was the only place where boats were made for trading partners
Romans learned about new cultures through trading with other civilizations which allowed them to maintain a diverse empire. The correct answer is B.
Specialization allowed the Romans to maintain a diverse empire by facilitating trade and exchange with other civilizations. As the Roman Empire expanded, it encountered a wide range of cultures and peoples with different skills, resources, and technologies.
Rather than trying to conquer or suppress these cultures, the Romans often sought to trade with them and learn from them. This allowed them to incorporate new ideas and technologies into their own society, making it more diverse and adaptable.
For example, the Romans traded extensively with other Mediterranean civilizations, such as the Greeks, Egyptians, and Phoenicians. Through these interactions, they learned about new agricultural techniques, engineering methods, and artistic styles. They also imported goods such as spices, silk, and precious metals, which helped to fuel the Roman economy and create a wealthy merchant class.
Overall, specialization and trade allowed the Romans to create a diverse and interconnected empire that spanned multiple continents and incorporated a wide range of cultures and peoples. This helped to ensure the long-term stability and success of the Roman Empire.
To learn more about Romans refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/23304167
#SPJ11
How did the war of 1812 lead to division amongst the regions?
The War of 1812 was fought between the United States and Great Britain from the years 1812 to 1815 which had a vital impact on the United States regarding the division of regions.
The main issue of the division of regions in the United States was trade. When Great Britain and France were at war, they imposed heavy taxes on trade which was the main source for the United States economy. This restriction made America split into two continents.
The North American states supported the war by helping Great Britain to protect its economy with shipping and trading. But South America resisted the war and they relied on Agriculture and offset their economy.
To learn more about the War of 1812
https://brainly.com/question/700719
#SPJ4
3. 3. 8 Practice: Comparing the French and American Revolutions
The French and American Revolutions sought to depose monarchs in favour of democracy. The American strategy was effective, but the French strategy was chaotic and ultimately to Napoleon.
Both the French and American Revolutions were attempts to depose monarchs and create democratic democracies. They did, however, use different approaches and achieve different results. The American Revolution was started by a desire for representation and taxation without permission, resulting in a successful independence movement and the foundation of a democratic government.
In contrast, the French Revolution was powered by a complex combination of political, social, and economic causes, resulting in a time of turbulence, bloodshed, and, finally, the emergence of Napoleon Bonaparte. While both revolutions had a significant impact on world history, their paths and outcomes diverged significantly.
Learn more about American Revolutions:
https://brainly.com/question/29648454
#SPJ4
The contribution of Johannes Gutenberg to printing
The printing press was invented about 1436 by German goldsmith Johannes Gutenberg, however he was far from the first to automate the book-printing process.
When Andreas Dritzehn died at Christmas 1438, his heirs filed a lawsuit against Gutenberg, claiming that they should be named partners in order to avoid the requirements of the contract. The action was dismissed, but the trial revealed that Gutenberg was working on a new innovation.
Witnesses claimed that a carpenter named Conrad Saspach loaned funds to Andreas Dritzehn for the construction of a wooden press, and a jeweler named Hans Dünne stated that he sold Gutenberg 100 guilders' worth of printing supplies as early as 1436.
Gutenberg, who was supposedly well on his way to finishing his invention, was keen to keep the nature of the venture hidden.
To know more about Johannes Gutenberg:
https://brainly.com/question/3598970
#SPJ4
Complete question:
The contribution of Johannes Gutenberg to printing was _______
According To The Creators Of Barney Wasn't Barney going to be a Blanket then a bear?
This is correct. According To The Creators Of Barney Wasn't Barney going to be a Blanket then a bear
Why was Barney changed?"Barney & Friends" producers indicated that the character Barney was first introduced as a blanket entity, later transitioning into a bear. Sheryl Leach, the show's creator, intended to fabricate a figure that would pacify children similarly to a cozy coverlet.
Her original design for the protagonist involved an enchanted covering convert into a playful companion for youngsters; however, she restructured the idea and transformed it into a brown-haired, friendly bear named Barney.
Read more on Barney & Friends here: https://brainly.com/question/31160614
#SPJ1
Similar to the confederate statues, the statue of
christopher columbus is also a symbol of past and
present bigotry. for indigenous communities
specifically, it is a reminder of their conquest, which
can be described as apocalyptic. the columbus
statue stands as a monument to the near genocide
of indigenous peoples throughout the americas
and if left standing, it will remain a symbol of their
continued oppression as indigenous peoples
throughout this nation, as well as this continent,
are disenfranchised, segregated, or they live in
inadequate housing, they struggle with access to
health care and are victims of continued
violence. removing the monument, therefore,
serves several purposes. first, it confronts racism,
and at present, it is not enough to be non-racist; we
must be anti-racist. second, removing this symbol
of racism is a step in the right direction towards
repairing the injustices committed against
indigenous populations everywhere. your task is to
make a case for or against the removal of
confederate statues and statues of christopher
columbus.
Statues of Christopher Columbus and Confederate leaders can represent oppression and bigotry for marginalized communities. Removing them can confront racism and repair injustices, while leaving them standing may perpetuate systemic inequalities. The decision to remove or keep these statues should be based on a thoughtful consideration of their significance and impact.
The case for removal:
1. The Confederate statues and the statue of Christopher Columbus are symbols of past and present bigotry. For Indigenous communities, these monuments are reminders of their conquest, which can be described as apocalyptic.
2. These statues stand as monuments to the near genocide of Indigenous peoples throughout the Americas. If left standing, they will remain symbols of continued oppression, as Indigenous people face disenfranchisement, segregation, inadequate housing, limited access to healthcare, and continued violence.
3. Removing these monuments serves several purposes. First, it confronts racism, and at present, it is not enough to be non-racist; we must be anti-racist. Second, removing these symbols of racism is a step in the right direction towards repairing the injustices committed against Indigenous populations everywhere.
The case against removal:
1. Some argue that the removal of these statues erases history and that they serve as important reminders of the past. By keeping these monuments, society can learn from the mistakes made during those times.
2. Another argument is that the removal of these statues could lead to a slippery slope where other monuments with controversial histories may also be removed or altered.
3. Finally, some people believe that the resources and energy spent on removing these statues could be better directed towards implementing policies and initiatives to improve the lives of marginalized communities today.
In conclusion, there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate. Ultimately, the decision to remove or keep Confederate statues and statues of Christopher Columbus should be carefully considered and should take into account the feelings and opinions of those most affected by these symbols.
To know more about Christopher Columbus refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28187018#
#SPJ11
What was the Replacement of the M14 In the Vietnam War?
A. M16
B. M60
C. M4
What countries was helping Vietnam in the Vietnam war?
A.Soviet Union, China, North Korea and other communist countries
B.Nepal, Kazakhstan, Mongolia and other republic countries
C.None of the above
What Side won in the Vietnam War?
A.North Vietnam
B. South Vietnam
C.It was a draw.
What checkpoint was in East And west Germany?
A.Checkpoint Charlie
B.Checkpoint Communist
C.Checkpoint "See You In Heaven"
Explanation:
The answer to the first question is A. M16.
The answer to the second question is A. Soviet Union, China, North Korea, and other communist countries.
The answer to the third question is A. North Vietnam.
The answer to the fourth question is A. Checkpoint Charlie.
1. What is the narrator (Koenig) trying to figure out in this episode?
2. Why did Adnan say it was easy to date someone like Hae; someone with Hae’s family restrictions?
3. What happened at the homecoming dance?
4. The prosecution implied that Adnan’s job as an EMT (emergency medical technician) gave him the skills to do what?
5. What is the detail about the day of the murder that Koenig says doesn’t look good for Adnan?
6. Who said they saw Hae and Adnan in the car together after school?
7. Originally Adnan told Detective Adcock that he asked Hae for a ride the day she disappeared, then he changed his story. What does this do to your belief in his innocence?
The narrator is trying to figure out the timeline of the day Hae was murdered and examining witness statements and phone records.
In this episode, the storyteller (Koenig) is attempting to sort out the course of events of the day that Hae Min Lee was killed. She is looking at witness articulations and telephone records to attempt to sort out what occurred.
Adnan said it was not difficult to date somebody like Hae, with her family limitations, since it made things seriously invigorating. He partook in the adventure of sneaking around and disrupting the guidelines.
As per one observer, Hae left the homecoming dance right on time, around 9 pm, with a not man Adnan.
The indictment inferred that Adnan's occupation as an EMT gave him the abilities to choke Hae and make it seem to be a characteristic demise.
The insight concerning the day of the homicide that doesn't look really great for Adnan is that he asked Hae for a ride after school, despite the fact that he had his own vehicle and there were others who might have given him a ride.
Jay Wilds, Adnan's companion, said he saw Hae and Adnan in the vehicle together after school on the day she vanished.
Adnan's changing tale about whether he asked Hae for a ride on the day she vanished raises issues about his guiltlessness. It recommends that he might be lying or attempting to disguise something, which subverts his validity as an observer.
Nonetheless, it is essential to take note of that individuals' recollections can be questionable, and changing a detail of a story doesn't be guaranteed to mean somebody is at fault for a wrongdoing.
To learn more about Hae, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/31211044
#SPJ4
Which of these was an economic reason for the success of the EASTERN Roman Empire?
Responses
A It was never threatened.It was never threatened.
B It was where the Empire began.It was where the Empire began.
C It was in a better location.It was in a better location.
D It was closest to Rome.
Answer:
I believe it's C.
Explanation:
One of the economic foundations of the empire was trade. Constantinople was located on important east-west and north-south trade routes. Trebizond was an important port in the eastern trade. The exact routes varied over the years with wars and the political situation.
A result of the attempted coup against the soviet government in 1991 was that
Answer:
A result of the attempted coup against the soviet government in 1991 was that the Soviet Union collapsed and 15 independent countries emerged from its ashes, marking the end of the Cold War era and the beginning of a new geopolitical landscape in Eurasia.
Explanation:
A result of the attempted coup against the Soviet government in 1991 was that the Soviet Union dissolved and 15 independent countries emerged in its place.
The attempted coup against Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev in August 1991 was an unsuccessful attempt by Communist Party hardliners to take control of the government and halt the liberalization policies of Gorbachev's administration. The coup ultimately failed, and in its aftermath, the Soviet Union began to disintegrate.
On December 26, 1991, the leaders of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus signed the Belavezha Accords, which declared the Soviet Union dissolved and established the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in its place. Over the next few months, 12 other former Soviet republics joined the CIS, and by the end of 1991, the Soviet Union had ceased to exist as a political entity.
Learn more about Soviet Union: https://brainly.com/question/22221281
#SPJ11
What are two reasons why a president might issue a signing statement?
To explain why the bill is being vetoed instead of signed.
To explain how the law should be interpreted.
To describe parts of the law with which he or she disagrees.
To thank the legislative branch for passing the bill
Two reasons for a president to issue a signing statement are to explain how the law should be interpreted and to describe the parts of the law with which he or she disagrees. Here options B and C are correct.
Two reasons why a president might issue a signing statement are:
To explain how the law should be interpreted: A signing statement is a written statement issued by the president when signing a bill into law. It is used to clarify the president's understanding of the law and how it should be implemented. In some cases, a president may issue a signing statement to provide guidance on the interpretation of specific provisions of the law, to help ensure that it is enforced in a manner consistent with the president's policy objectives.
To describe parts of the law with which he or she disagrees: Another reason why a president might issue a signing statement is to express disagreement with specific provisions of the law. While the president may choose to sign a bill into law, there may be certain provisions that he or she disagrees with.
In such cases, a signing statement can be used to communicate the president's objections and explain why he or she is signing the bill into law despite those objections. By issuing a signing statement, the president can also signal to Congress and the public that he or she intends to interpret and implement the law in a manner consistent with his or her own policy priorities.
To learn more about the president
https://brainly.com/question/23963476
#SPJ4
Complete question:
What are two reasons why a president might issue a signing statement?
A - To explain why the bill is being vetoed instead of signed.
B - To explain how the law should be interpreted.
C - To describe parts of the law with which he or she disagrees.
D - To thank the legislative branch for passing the bill
What was the result of the Watergate scandal?
Americans became politically disillusioned.
The president was impeached.
Congress censured the president.
Only Democratic presidents were elected through the 1990s
Goal/ Purpose of the Speech of Tecumseh’s speech and between the logs speech
The Speech of Tecumseh aimed to unite Native American tribes against the expansion of European settlers, particularly the Americans, in the early 19th century.
The goal and purpose of Tecumseh's Speech and the Between the Logs Speech are:
Tecumseh, a Shawnee leader, encouraged tribal unity and resistance to land dispossession and the erosion of Native American culture. The Between the Logs Speech was delivered by John Quincy Adams, then Secretary of State, during the negotiation of the Treaty of Ghent in 1814. The goal of this speech was to advocate for American interests, including the rights of neutral trade and the prevention of the impressment of American sailors by the British during the War of 1812.
Know more about Speech of Tecumseh:
https://brainly.com/question/31212507
#SPJ11
The author of "Excerpt from Gadgets: Built to not last"and "Don't fix your fridge,just a new one" give advice to consumers. what advice does each author give? How does each author use edvice to convince the reader to follow his advice ?which author is gtthe most convincing ? use details from both the exerpt and the artical to support your response. in your author be sure to identify the advice each author gives consumers. explain how each author uses evidence to convince the reader to follw his advice. evaluate which author is more convinicing .use details from both the excerpt and the artical to support youe respose.
"Excerpt from Gadgets: Built to not last" advises consumers to prioritize buying high-quality, long-lasting products, rather than constantly buying and replacing cheap, lower-quality items.
Argument of the author -The author argues that this not only saves money in the long run, but also helps reduce waste and contributes to a more sustainable future. The author uses evidence such as statistics on the amount of electronic waste generated each year and examples of products that are designed to fail in order to support their argument.
"Don't fix your fridge, just buy a new one" advises consumers to replace their broken or outdated appliances rather than attempting to repair them. The author argues that repairs are often costly and may not even extend the life of the appliance significantly. The author also suggests that newer models of appliances are more energy-efficient and therefore better for the environment.
To know more about "excerpt from gadgets: built to not last" -
https://brainly.com/question/26834680
#SPJ1
how did thurgood marshal contribute to the civil rights movement
Answer:
Thurgood Marshall was a prominent American lawyer and civil rights activist who is widely regarded as one of the most important figures in the fight for racial equality in the United States. Marshall's contributions to the civil rights movement were numerous and wide-ranging.
First and foremost, Marshall was a skilled legal strategist and litigator who worked tirelessly to challenge segregation and racial discrimination through the legal system. He served as the lead attorney in a number of groundbreaking civil rights cases, including Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark 1954 Supreme Court decision that declared segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional. This case was a major victory for the civil rights movement and helped pave the way for other legal challenges to racial discrimination.
In addition to his legal work, Marshall was also a vocal advocate for civil rights and a powerful public speaker. He used his platform to call attention to the injustices of segregation and to push for greater equality and opportunity for African Americans. He was a key figure in the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and served as the organization's first African American legal counsel and later as its first African American president.
Marshall's contributions to the civil rights movement were numerous and far-reaching. His legal victories helped to dismantle many of the legal structures that supported segregation and discrimination, while his advocacy and leadership helped to mobilize a generation of activists in the fight for racial equality. Today, Marshall is widely recognized as one of the most important figures in the history of the civil rights movement, and his legacy continues to inspire and guide those who are fighting for justice and equality today.
In mythology
Why do you believe the story of Persephone has persisted over time?
The story of Persephone has persisted over time because the ancient Greeks used this explanation to describe the yearly cycle of death and rebirth that is nature.
The world is familiar with the legend of Persephone, the endearing daughter of the goddess Demeter who was abducted by Hades and subsequently transformed into the ruler of the underworld.
The tale of Persephone teaches us in a similar way that, despite the incorporation of shadows, there remains a rich supply of vitality and power.
The myth has a lot to teach us about the mother-child bond in addition to the value of grieving and the connection between life and death.
Therefore, The tale of Persephone has lasted throughout history because the ancient Greeks used it to explain nature's seasonal cycle of death and rebirth.
To know more about the story of Persephone, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28860312
#SPJ1
Read Pauli Murray's recollection of segregation (500). What specific instances does she point out that symbolize the segregated society in which she was raised. What role did skin color play—what does she mean by a "minority within a minority"? Summarize the Brown v. Board of Education decision (559), and what impact did it have on the South especially?
Pauli Murray's recollection of segregation provides a vivid account of the reality of segregation in the United States. It highlights the many ways in which people of color were marginalized and discriminated against. The Brown v. Board of Education decision was a significant milestone in the struggle for civil rights, and it challenged the racist policies that had been in place for decades.
However, it also highlights the resistance to change and the challenges that still remain in the fight for equality and justice for all.
Pauli Murray's recollection of segregation highlights the harsh reality of a segregated society that she experienced while growing up. She points out several instances that symbolize the segregated society she was raised in.
For instance, she highlights that the swimming pool at her community center was only available to white children, and black children were not allowed to use it. Murray also recalls being forced to sit in the back of the bus when she visited her grandparents in Virginia, and her father being refused service at a restaurant because of his skin color.
She also notes that skin color played a crucial role in determining one's status in society, and that people of color were seen as a minority within a minority. This meant that they were marginalized even further, and their voices were often ignored.
The Brown v. Board of Education decision was a landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954 that declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional. The case involved a group of African American parents who sued the Board of Education in Topeka, Kansas, for segregating their children in public schools based on their race.
The Court's ruling declared that separate but equal educational facilities for different races were inherently unequal, violating the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The impact of the Brown v. Board of Education decision on the South was significant, as it challenged the Jim Crow laws that had been in place for decades. However, the ruling was met with resistance in many Southern states, with some refusing to comply with the ruling.
Some white parents withdrew their children from public schools rather than have them attend integrated schools. The decision paved the way for the civil rights movement and other legal challenges to segregation in other areas of society.
In conclusion, Pauli Murray's recollection of segregation provides a vivid account of the reality of segregation in the United States. It highlights the many ways in which people of color were marginalized and discriminated against.
The Brown v. Board of Education decision was a significant milestone in the struggle for civil rights, and it challenged the racist policies that had been in place for decades. However, it also highlights the resistance to change and the challenges that still remain in the fight for equality and justice for all.
To know more about Brown v. Board of Education decision refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14342197#
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer. What was King Piye’s major accomplishment in Egypt?
A. He united Egypt and Kush. B. He taught Egyptians archery. C. He defeated the Assyrian ruler. D. He built the highest pyramid
A. He united Egypt and Kush.
Which country was not located in one of the three theaters of world war ii?.
The country that was not located in one of the three theaters of World War II was Switzerland.
During World War II, the three main theaters of the war were the European Theater, the Pacific Theater, and the African/Middle Eastern Theater. Switzerland, however, remained neutral throughout the war and was not involved in any of the fighting that occurred in these theaters.
Despite being surrounded by Axis powers and Allied powers, Switzerland managed to maintain its neutrality by enforcing strict military, economic, and political policies. Switzerland served as a safe haven for refugees and was also a center of espionage and intelligence gathering during the war.
To know more about World War II , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ4
Explain what funding the nonprofit organization has decided to use in the following scenario:
Situation: Hurricane Sandy wiped out thousands of homes along the East Coast, especially in the New Jersey/New York areas in October 2012. The board of directors for a nonprofit human services organization in a central state decided to send a sizable donation to help with relief efforts for those in need
In the given scenario, the nonprofit organization has decided to use a sizable donation to fund their relief efforts for those affected by Hurricane Sandy.
Hurricane Sandy wiped out thousands of homes along the East Coast, especially in the New Jersey/New York areas in October 2012. The board of directors made this decision to support the thousands of homes that were wiped out along the East Coast, particularly in the New Jersey/New York areas, in October 2012. This donation will help the nonprofit organization provide assistance to those in need during the aftermath of this devastating natural disaster.
Learn more about Hurricane Sandy: https://brainly.com/question/29414847
#SPJ11
What was one major effect of increased trade in China during the postclassical period?
One major effect of increased trade in China during the postclassical period was the expansion of its economy and influence, leading to a prosperous golden age.
The postclassical period in China (approximately 589-1368 CE) saw increased trade due to various factors, such as the growth of the Silk Road, advancements in maritime technology, and a stable political climate under the Tang and Song dynasties.
As trade flourished, the Chinese economy expanded and experienced an influx of wealth. This economic growth allowed China to invest in urban development, education, arts, and sciences, leading to significant cultural advancements.
Furthermore, the increased trade facilitated the exchange of ideas, technology, and religion with other regions, which enhanced China's global influence.
This prosperous period, often referred to as a golden age, not only strengthened China's domestic economy but also solidified its position as a prominent player in international trade and cultural exchange.
To know more about economic growth click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/9751211#
#SPJ11
Why do you think West and East Africa saw a series of kingdoms develop within the same general areas?
According to research, we can claim West and East Africa saw a number of kingdoms develop within the same general areas because of the geographical location of the place, religion and local trade routes.
How did location aid in the development of kingdoms?The fertile soil of East and West Africa enabled the development of a wide variety of agricultural production, stimulating the economy and wealth.
Therefore, as well as the local geography, we can also attribute the creation of the kingdoms in western and eastern arica to the expansionism of islam, which helped in the religious unification, thus fomenting the creation of communities.
Find out more about East Africa at:
https://brainly.com/question/823442
#SPJ1
An early law at the national level that prohibited slavery in a specific part of the united states was the ______.
The early law at the national level that prohibited slavery in a specific part of the United States was the Northwest Ordinance of 1787.
This ordinance was passed by the Continental Congress under the Articles of Confederation, before the adoption of the United States Constitution. The Northwest Ordinance prohibited slavery in the Northwest Territory, which at the time included lands north of the Ohio River and east of the Mississippi River.
The Northwest Ordinance also established a process for admitting new states into the Union from this territory, with the requirement that new states would not allow slavery within their borders. This was a significant early step towards the eventual abolition of slavery in the United States and demonstrated the growing anti-slavery sentiment among some of the nation's founders.
While the Northwest Ordinance did not abolish slavery in other parts of the country, it did help to establish a precedent for federal legislation that would eventually lead to the end of slavery in the United States.
To know more about Northwest Ordinance refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/29034216
#SPJ11
The formation of the has had the greatest effect on the economies of European contries today
Answer:
The formation of the European Union (EU) has had a significant effect on the economies of European countries today. The EU is a political and economic union of 27 member states located primarily in Europe, and it was formed with the goal of promoting economic cooperation and integration among its member countries.
What were the driving forces of Japan's imperial actions?
The driving forces of Japan's imperial actions were a combination of factors that led to the desire for expansion and the establishment of a Japanese empire. Some of the key driving forces include:
Economic motives: Japan had limited resources and a rapidly growing population, which led to a need for new markets and resources. Expansion and the establishment of a Japanese empire were seen as a means to secure new territories and resources for economic growth.
Nationalism: There was a strong sense of nationalism in Japan, which was fueled by the belief in the superiority of the Japanese culture and race. This led to a desire to establish Japan as a major world power and to assert its dominance in the region.
Military ambitions: The Japanese military had significant influence in the government and was eager to expand Japan's military power and influence. The military also believed that expansion and the establishment of a Japanese empire would help to secure Japan's borders and protect the country from foreign threats.
Political factors: Japan was experiencing significant political instability, and the establishment of a Japanese empire was seen as a way to unify the country and provide a sense of national purpose.
Imperialist ambitions: Japan was influenced by the imperialist actions of other major powers, such as the United States and European countries. This led to a desire to emulate their actions and establish Japan as a major imperial power.
In summary, the driving forces of Japan's imperial actions were a combination of economic motives, nationalism, military ambitions, political factors, and imperialist ambitions. These factors led to a desire for expansion and the establishment of a Japanese empire, which ultimately led to Japan's involvement in World War II.