Last year at a certain high school, there were 124 boys on the honor roll and 125 girls on the honor roll. This year, the number of boys on the honor roll decreased by 25% and the number of girls on the honor roll decreased by 20%. By what percentage did the total number of students on the honor roll decrease? Round your answer to the nearest tenth (if necessary).

z = 4(x - 1) - ln (y - 4)

Therefore, the equation of the tangent plane to the surface z = y ln x at the point (1, 4, 0) is z = 4(x - 1) - ln (y - 4).

To determine the equation of the tangent plane to the surface z = y ln x at the point (1, 4, 0), we first need to find the partial derivatives of the surface with respect to x and y.

∂z/∂x = y/x

∂z/∂y = ln x

Then, we can use these partial derivatives along with the point (1, 4, 0) to find the equation of the tangent plane using the formula:

z - z0 = ∂z/∂x(x0, y0)(x - x0) + ∂z/∂y(x0, y0)(y - y0)

where (x0, y0, z0) is the given point.

Plugging in the values, we have:

z - 0 = (4/1)(x - 1) + ln 1(y - 4)

Simplifying:

z = 4(x - 1) - ln (y - 4)

Therefore, the equation of the tangent plane to the surface z = y ln x at the point (1, 4, 0) is z = 4(x - 1) - ln (y - 4).

Learn more about tangent plane here:

https://brainly.com/question/30260323

#SPJ11

Answer:

n = 6.

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope of the line = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1) where the 2 points are (x1, y1) and (x2, y2).

So, (-8 - (-7)) / (n - 0) = -1/6

-1/n = -1/6

n = 6.

The time between buses arriving at the stop follows an exponential distribution with a mean of 26 minutes.

To find the probability of waiting at least 4 minutes for the bus, we can use the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the exponential distribution:

P(waiting at least 4 minutes) = 1 - P(waiting less than 4 minutes)

The probability of waiting less than 4 minutes can be calculated using the CDF:

P(waiting less than 4 minutes) = 1 - e^(-4/26) ≈ 0.146

Therefore, the probability of waiting at least 4 minutes for the bus is:

P(waiting at least 4 minutes) = 1 - 0.146 ≈ 0.854

So the probability of having to wait at least 4 minutes for the bus is about 85.4%.

Hypothesis: Every time you practice, you gain more skills.

Conclusion: Gain of skills is a result of practice.

Converse: If you gain more skills, then you practice every time.

Inverse: If you don't practice, then you don't gain more skills.

Contrapositive: If you don't gain more skills, then you don't practice every time.

The hypothesis states that practicing leads to an increase in skills. This can be interpreted as a cause and effect relationship between the two variables.

The conclusion reiterates that gaining skills is a result of practice.

The converse of the statement flips the order of the hypothesis and the conclusion. It states that if you gain more skills, then you must have practiced every time.

This may not be entirely true because there can be other factors that contribute to the gain of skills besides practice.

The inverse of the statement negates both the hypothesis and the conclusion. It states that if you don't practice, then you don't gain more skills.

This statement is true because practice is a necessary condition for gaining skills. However, it doesn't mean that practicing alone guarantees the gain of skills.

The contrapositive of the statement flips the order of the negated hypothesis and the negated conclusion. It states that if you don't gain more skills, then you didn't practice every time.

This statement is also true because if one doesn't practice, they cannot expect to gain more skills.

Learn more about practice

brainly.com/question/2962699

#SPJ11

By 2009, it is projected that approximately 13,956 three-legged frogs will inhabit the area.

Recent studies have indicated a growing concern for the population of three-legged frogs in a specific area, as they have been exposed to chemical pollutants. In the year 2000, data estimated that there were about 5,000 three-legged frogs (N) in this area. With an annual increase of 15%, we can project the number of frogs in future years using the formula:

Future population = N * (1 + growth rate) ^ number of years

In this case, we want to determine the number of three-legged frogs in the area by 2009. To calculate this, we will use the given values:

Future population = 5,000 * (1 + 0.15) ^ (2009 - 2000)

Future population = 5,000 * (1.15)⁹

Future population ≈ 13,956

Therefore, by 2009, it is projected that approximately 13,956 three-legged frogs will inhabit the area, rounding to the nearest whole number. This increase in population highlights the potential ecological consequences of chemical pollutants on the environment and the need for further investigation and mitigation measures.

To know more about projection, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/15583437#

#SPJ11

The equation x + 4 = -2 + x has no solution for x

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

x + 4 = -2 + x

Subtract x from both sides of the equation

so, we have the following representation

x - x + 4 = -2 + x - x

When the like terms of the equation are evaluated, we have

4 = -2

The above equation is false

This is because 4 and -2 do not have the same value

Hence, the equation has no solution

Read more about equation at

https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ1

For the point (7,8) in the coordinate plane which represents a ratio, Adela claims that you can find equivalent ratio by adding the same number to both coordinate of the point is incorrect.

Adela claim is not correct. To find an equivalent ratio, you should multiply (or divide) both coordinates by the same nonzero number instead of adding the same number.

1. The point (7,8) represents the ratio 7:8.

2. If we add the same number to both coordinates, let's say 2, we get the point (9,10), which represents the ratio 9:10.

3. We can check if 7:8 and 9:10 are equivalent ratios by cross-multiplying:

7 * 10 = 70 and 8 * 9 = 72. Since 70 ≠ 72, these ratios are not equivalent.

Therefore, Adela's claim is incorrect because adding the same number to both coordinates of the point does not result in an equivalent ratio. To find equivalent ratios, you should multiply (or divide) both coordinates by the same nonzero number.

Learn more about Equivalent ratio:

https://brainly.com/question/2914376

#SPJ11

The amount of water that leaks from the bucket each hour is 38 ounces/hour.

The amount of water in the bucket at 8 am would have been 380 ounces. The bucket will be empty after 8 hours, or at 6 pm.

To find the amount of water that leaks from the bucket each hour, we can use the information that the leak is at a constant rate. We can find the total amount of water that leaked out of the bucket from 10 am to 3 pm, which is 304 - 114 = 190 ounces.

This is over a time period of 5 hours (from 10 am to 3 pm), so the amount of water that leaks from the bucket each hour is:

190 ounces ÷ 5 hours = 38 ounces/hour

To find how many ounces of water were in the bucket at 8 am, we need to estimate the amount of water that leaked out from 8 am to 10 am. We know that the bucket loses 38 ounces of water every hour, so from 8 am to 10 am (2 hours), the amount of water that leaked out would be:

38 ounces/hour x 2 hours = 76 ounces

Therefore, the amount of water in the bucket at 8 am would have been:

304 ounces + 76 ounces = 380 ounces

To find at what time the bucket will be empty, we can assume that the leak rate remains constant at 38 ounces/hour. We know that the bucket starts with 304 ounces, so we can set up the equation:

y = 304 - 38x

where y is the amount of water in the bucket and x is the time in hours since the leak began. When the bucket is empty, y will be zero, so we can solve for x:

0 = 304 - 38x

38x = 304

x = 8

Therefore, the bucket will be empty after 8 hours, or at 6 pm.

The equation for the amount of water in the bucket as a function of time can be written in slope-intercept form as:

y = -38x + 304

where the slope (m) is -38 (the rate at which water is leaking out of the bucket) and the y-intercept (b) is 304 (the initial amount of water in the bucket).

To know more about equation, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29987959#

#SPJ11

We can see here that in order to find the median of the lower half of data, one will have to sort out the data in an ascending order. Then take the  lower half of the data (i.e., the first half of the sorted data) and find its median.

The median, which is used to measure central tendency in statistics, is the point at which a dataset may be divided into two equal parts. If a dataset has an even number of values, it is the average of the two middle values or the middle value in a sorted dataset.

The values in the dataset must first be arranged from lowest to highest in order to determine the median. The median is the middle value if the dataset has an odd number of values.

Learn more about median on https://brainly.com/question/26177250

#SPJ1

The equation that could be Orhan's equation for the linear function that relates temperature and refreshment sales is   Y = 15x + 40.

This is because the equation is in the form of y = mx + b, where m is the slope (or rate of change) and b is the y-intercept. In this case, the slope is 15, which means that for every increase of 1 degree in temperature, there will be an increase of 15 units in refreshment sales.

The y-intercept is 40, which means that even at a temperature of 0 degrees, there will still be some refreshment sales (40 units).

The other equations do not have a linear relationship between temperature and sales, as they either have a quadratic term (A), a negative slope (C), or a large negative constant term (D).

Hence, option B is the correct answer.

To know more about Orhan's equation refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/27465710

#SPJ11

Answer:11

Step-by-step explanation:Vertically opposite angles are the same.
Alternate(Z)angles are the same.Therefore we have an angle of 143 vertically opposite to the equation.143-55=88
88/8=11

The value of (f-g)(2) is 16, provided that Megan has made no mistakes in the calculation.

The problem asks us to compute the value of (f - g)(2) where f(x) = 3x^2 - 2x + 4 and g(x) = x^2 - 5x + 2.

The notation (f - g)(2) means that we need to subtract g(x) from f(x) and then evaluate the result at x = 2. We can do this as follows:

(f - g)(x) = f(x) - g(x) = (3x^2 - 2x + 4) - (x^2 - 5x + 2) = 2x^2 + 3x + 2

Substituting x = 2, we get:

(f - g)(2) = 2(2)^2 + 3(2) + 2 = 16

Therefore, the value of (f - g)(2) is 16.

It's worth noting that the problem statement mentions "what did she do wrong?" without providing any context or information about what Megan did or didn't do. So, it's not possible to identify any error in Megan's solution based on the given information. However, based on the correct computation above, we can be sure that (f - g)(2) is indeed equal to 16.

In other words, it can be described as,

The error in Megan's solution is not clear from the given statement. However, it seems that she may have made an error while computing (f-g)(2).

To compute (f-g)(2), we need to subtract g(2) from f(2) as follows:

f(2) = 3(2)^2 - 2(2) + 4 = 12

g(2) = (2)^2 - 5(2) + 2 = -4

Therefore, (f-g)(2) = f(2) - g(2) = 12 - (-4) = 16. is the final conclusion.

Learn more about Solution

brainly.com/question/30198131

#SPJ11

Expressions A and B represent the length of side MN.

The two expressions that represent the length of side MN are A) 4•sin(65) and B) 1.9•cos(65). The length of side MN can be found using the trigonometric ratios of sine and cosine in a right triangle.

The angle of 65 degrees is opposite to side MN and the hypotenuse of the triangle is given as 4 units. Using the sine ratio, we can find the length of MN as 4•sin(65). Similarly, using the cosine ratio, we can find the length of MN as 1.9•cos(65).

Therefore, expressions A and B both represent the length of side MN, and they have been obtained by using different trigonometric ratios.

Learn more about expressions

brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ11

Answer:

6w-9

Step-by-step explanation:

2w×3=6w

-3×3=-9

=6w-9

Given that 27.5 is the bottom end of the box, the lower quartile's value equation (Q1) must fall between 27.5 and 30. Hence, the appropriate response is 37.

Since, A mathematical equation links two statements and utilizes the equals sign (=) to indicate equality.

In algebra, an equation is a mathematical assertion that proves the equality of two mathematical expressions.

For instance, in the equation 3x + 5 = 14, the equal sign separates the numbers by a gap. A mathematical formula may be used to determine how the two sentences on either side of a letter relate to one another. The logo and the particular piece of software are usually identical. like, for instance, 2x - 4 = 2.

Here, 25% of the data fall inside the lower quartile (Q1), which is represented by that number. Q1 is situated near the bottom of the box in the box plot.

According to the description, the box's boundary is at 30, and its size ranges from 27.5 to 42.5 on the number line. As a result, the median value of the middle 50% of the data is 37, with a range of 27.5 to 42.5.

There are some data points outside the middle 50% since the lines outside the box finish at 15 and 55.

Hence; 27.5 is the bottom end of the box, the lower quartile's value (Q1) must fall between 27.5 and 42.5.

Hence, the appropriate response is,

= 37

To know more about equation visit:

brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

The work done on the displacement is 301.95J

To determine the work done, we need to find the displacement in which the box moved.

cos θ = adjacent / hypothenuse

cos 33 = adjacent / 80

adjacent = 80 * cos 33

adjacent = 67.1 lbs

The force applied is 67.1lbs

The displacement on the ramp;

sin θ = opposite / hypothenuse

sin 10 = opposite / 26

opposite = 26 * sin 10

opposite = 4.5 ft

The work done in moving the object can be calculated as;

work done = force * displacement

work done = 67.1 * 4.5

work done = 301.95 J

Learn more on work done here;

https://brainly.com/question/25573309

#SPJ1

To estimate the proportion of admitted hospital patients who have type 2 diabetes at Orlando Health Hospitals within a certain margin of error and confidence level,

we can use the following formula to determine the necessary sample size:

[tex]n = [(Z^2 * p * q) / E^2] / [1 + ((Z^2 * p * q) / E^2N)][/tex]

where:

n = sample size

Z = z-score for the desired confidence level (in this case, 1.81 for a 93% confidence level)

p = estimated proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes (unknown)

q = 1 - p

E = margin of error (0.06)

N = population size (unknown)

Since we do not know the estimated proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes or the population size,

we can assume a conservative estimate of p = q = 0.5, which maximizes the sample size required.

Plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]n = [(1.81^2 * 0.5 * 0.5) / 0.06^2] / [1 + ((1.81^2 * 0.5 * 0.5) / 0.06^2N)][/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex]n = 1242.95 / [1 + (2.4 / N)][/tex]

To satisfy the requirements of the problem, we need to round up to the nearest whole number, so we need a sample size of at least 1243 patients.

Note that if we had a better estimate for p or N, we could use those values in the formula to get a more precise sample size.

To know more about margin of error refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29101642#

#SPJ11

James weighs 6084 more pounds than both of his dogs combined.

To find out how many more pounds James weighs than both of his dogs combined, we first need to calculate the total weight of the dogs. Since he has two dogs that weigh 1314 pounds each, we can find the total weight of the dogs by multiplying 1314 by 2, which gives us 2628 pounds.

Next, we can add the weight of both dogs together to get the total weight of the dogs, which is 2628 pounds. We can then subtract the weight of the dogs (2628 pounds) from James' weight (8712 pounds) to find out how many more pounds James weighs than both of his dogs combined.

Therefore, James weighs 6084 more pounds than both of his dogs combined. This can be calculated by subtracting the weight of the dogs (2628 pounds) from James' weight (8712 pounds), which gives us 6084 pounds.

To know more about weight, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/8308591#

#SPJ11

The equation in slope-intercept form that models the total cost of attendance is: y = 2,633x + 275.


1. Add up the annual costs: tuition and fees ($4,934), room and board ($1,424), and cost of books and supplies ($1,250) to get the total annual cost: $4,934 + $1,424 + $1,250 = $7,608.

2. Subtract the annual scholarship and grants from the total annual cost: $7,608 - $5,250 = $2,358. This is the slope (x) of the equation, as it represents the cost per year.

3. The other one-time fee ($275) is the y-intercept of the equation, as it's a fixed cost that does not change with the number of years.

4. Put the slope and y-intercept into the slope-intercept form (y = mx + b) to get: y = 2,633x + 275.

To know more about slope-intercept form click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29146348#

#SPJ11

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of equation comes out to be False.

In order to demonstrate consistency between two opposing statements, variable words are frequently used in sophisticated algorithms. Equations are academic phrases that are used to demonstrate the equality of different academic figures. Consider expression the details as y + 7 offers. In this case, elevating produces b + 7 when partnered with building y + 7.

Here,

False.

The order of operations we use to solve two-step equations is the same order we use to solve every other mathematical statement,

which is commonly recalled by the acronym PEMDAS. (parentheses, exponents, multiplication and division from left to right, and addition and subtraction from left to right).

The fundamental distinction is that we are carrying out the operations against the equation's representation. For instance, consider the following equation:

=> 2x + 5 = 11

To get the following result, we would first subtract 5 from both sides, then divide by 2.

=> x = 3

In order to "undo" the operations that were carried out on the variable in the original equation, we are utilising the same series of operations as usual, but in reverse order.

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

Equation of the circle: x^2 + (y - 2)^2 = 4

How to find the equation of the circle?

The circle centered at the origin and passing through the point (0, 4) can be represented by the equation of a circle. The general equation of a circle is (x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 = r^2, where (h, k) represents the center of the circle and r represents the radius.

Since the center is at the origin (0, 0), the equation simplifies to x^2 + y^2 = r^2. To determine the radius, we can use the point (0, 4) that lies on the circle. Substituting these coordinates into the equation, we get 0^2 + 4^2 = r^2. Simplifying, we find that 16 = r^2.

Therefore, the equation of the circle centered at the origin and passing through the point (0, 4) is x^2 + y^2 = 16.

Learn about more origin

brainly.com/question/24281628

#SPJ11

The approximate number of items that should be manufactured so that the profit, P(x) = R(x) - C(x), is maximum is 47 items (option C).

To find the approximate number of items that should be manufactured to maximize profit, we need to first find the profit function P(x) by subtracting the total cost, C(x), from the total revenue, R(x). Then, we need to find the critical points of P(x) and determine which one corresponds to the maximum profit.

Step 1: Find the profit function P(x) = R(x) - C(x)
Given R(x) = 25 ln(6x + 1) and C(x) = ∫x, let's find P(x):
P(x) = R(x) - C(x)
P(x) = 25 ln(6x + 1) - ∫x
Step 2: Find the critical points of P(x)
To find the critical points, we need to take the derivative of P(x) and set it equal to 0:
P'(x) = d/dx [25 ln(6x + 1) - ∫x]
Since the derivative of ln(6x + 1) is (6/(6x + 1)), and the derivative of ∫x is x:
P'(x) = 25 [tex]\times[/tex] (6/(6x + 1)) - x
Now, set P'(x) = 0 and solve for x:
25 [tex]\times[/tex] (6/(6x + 1)) - x = 0
Step 3: Determine which critical point corresponds to the maximum profit
The approximate number of items that should be manufactured so that the profit, P(x) = R(x) - C(x), is maximum is 47 items (option C).

To know more about Profit:

https://brainly.com/question/15036999

#SPJ11

The length of the diagonal is 12. 7in

To determine the length of the diagonal, we need to know the Pythagorean theorem.

The Pythagorean theorem states that the square of the hypotenuse side is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides of a triangle.

The other two sides are the opposite and the adjacent sides.

From the information given in the diagram, we have that;

The opposite side = 12in

The adjacent side = 4in

Substitute the values

x² = 12² + 4²

find the squares

x² = 160

find the square root

x = 12. 7 in

Learn about Pythagorean theorem at: https://brainly.com/question/654982

#SPJ1

To find dy for the function y = 72√x, given x = 4 and Δx = dx = 0.21, we will first find the derivative of y with respect to x and then plug in the given values.

1. Differentiate y with respect to x: y = 72√x can be rewritten as y = 72x^(1/2)
  Apply the power rule: dy/dx = 72 * (1/2)x^(-1/2)
  Simplify: dy/dx = 36x^(-1/2)

2. Plug in the given values: x = 4 and dx = 0.21
  dy/dx = 36(4)^(-1/2)
  dy/dx = 36(1/√4)
  dy/dx = 36(1/2)
  dy/dx = 18

3. Calculate dy: dy = (dy/dx) * dx
  dy = 18 * 0.21
  dy = 3.78

So, for y = 72√x, dy is 3.78 when x = 4 and Δx = dx = 0.21.

To learn more about ''find dy, given x'' visit : https://brainly.com/question/15272082

#SPJ11

Answer:

(- 4, 4 )

Step-by-step explanation:

y = - 7x - 24 → (1)

y = - 2x - 4 → (2)

substitute y = - 2x - 4 into (1)

- 2x - 4 = - 7x - 24 ( add 7x to both sides )

5x - 4 = - 24 ( add 4 to both sides )

5x = - 20 ( divide both sides by 5 )

x = - 4

substitute x = - 4 into either of the 2 equations and evaluate for y

substituting into (1)

y = - 7(- 4) - 24 = 28 - 24 = 4

solution is (- 4, 4 )

The absolute maximum value of the function f(x) is 222.

To find the absolute minimum value of the function f(x), we need to first find the critical points within the given interval -6 ≤ x ≤ 5. To do this, we take the derivative of f(x) and set it equal to zero:

f'(x) = 6x² + 12x - 144
0 = 6(x² + 2x - 24)
0 = 6(x+6)(x-4)

The critical points are x=-6, x=-4, and x=4. To determine which of these points correspond to a minimum value, we evaluate f(x) at each of these points and at the endpoints of the interval:

f(-6) = -880, f(-4) = -184, f(4) = -136, f(-6) = -880, f(5) = 222

Therefore, the absolute minimum value of the function f(x) is -880.

To find the absolute maximum value of the function f(x), we follow the same process. The critical points are still x=-6, x=-4, and x=4, but now we need to evaluate f(x) at each of these points and at the endpoints of the interval to determine which corresponds to a maximum value:

f(-6) = -880, f(-4) = -184, f(4) = -136, f(-6) = -880, f(5) = 222

Therefore, the absolute maximum value of the function f(x) is 222.

To learn more about critical points, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/7805334

#SPJ11

To find f'(4), we need to take the derivative of f(x) with respect to x and then evaluate it at x=4. Using the chain rule, we get:
f'(x) = -16x/(ln(3x^2))^2

So, f'(4) = -16(4)/(ln(3(4)^2))^2 = -64/(ln(48))^2

Rounding to 3 decimal places, we get f'(4) = -0.019.
To find f'(4) for f(x) = 8/ln(3x^2), we first need to differentiate f(x) with respect to x. We will use the quotient rule and the chain rule for this purpose.

The quotient rule states: (u/v)' = (u'v - uv')/v^2, where u = 8 and v = ln(3x^2).

Now, differentiate u and v with respect to x:
u' = 0 (since 8 is a constant)
v' = d(ln(3x^2))/dx = (1/(3x^2)) * d(3x^2)/dx (using chain rule)

Now, differentiate 3x^2 with respect to x:
d(3x^2)/dx = 6x

So, v' = (1/(3x^2)) * (6x) = 2/x

Now, apply the quotient rule for f'(x):
f'(x) = (0 - 8 * (2/x))/(ln(3x^2))^2 = -16/(x * (ln(3x^2))^2)

Now, plug in x = 4 to find f'(4):
f'(4) = -16/(4 * (ln(3*(4^2)))^2) = -16/(4 * (ln(48))^2)

Rounded to 3 decimal places, f'(4) ≈ -0.171.

Visit here to learn more about derivative  : https://brainly.com/question/25324584
#SPJ11

Therefor, the length of mantel in blueprint is > 30 ft

width of the mantel in the blueprint 8ft×2inc/1ft=16inch

The term "width" refers to the length from side to side of anything. For instance, the shorter side of a rectangle would be the width.

we know that

[scale]=[blueprint]/[actual]-------> [actual]=[blueprint]/[scale]

[scale]=3/5 in/ft

for [wall blueprint]=18 in

[wall actual]=[wall blueprint]/[scale]-------> 18/(3/5)----> 30 ft

Part A)

the actual wall is 30 ft  long

Part B) window has actual width of 2.5 ft

[ window blueprint]=[scale]*[actual window]-----> (3/5)*2.5----> 1.5 in

the width of the window in the blueprint is 1.5 in

Part C) Complete the table

For [blueprint length]=4 in

[actual length]=[blueprint length]/[scale]-------> 4/(3/5)----> 20/3 ft

For [blueprint length]=5 in

[actual length]=[blueprint length]/[scale]-------> 5/(3/5)----> 25/3 ft

For [blueprint length]=6 in

[actual length]=[blueprint length]/[scale]-------> 6/(3/5)----> 30/3=10 ft

For [blueprint length]=7 in

[actual length]=[blueprint length]/[scale]-------> 7/(3/5)----> 35/3 ft

For [actual length]=6 ft

[blueprint length]=[actual length]*[scale]-------> 6*(3/5)----> 18/5 in

For [actual length]=7 ft

[blueprint length]=[actual length]*[scale]-------> 7*(3/5)----> 21/5 in

For [actual length]=8 ft

[blueprint length]=[actual length]*[scale]-------> 8*(3/5)----> 24/5 in

For [actual length]=9 ft

[blueprint length]=[actual length]*[scale]-------> 9*(3/5)----> 27/5 in

B) width of the mantel in the blueprint 8ft×2inc/1ft=16inch

To know more about width visit:

brainly.com/question/30173060

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we can simplify the expression inside the parentheses by combining like terms:

-2(x + 12y - 5 - 17x - 16y + 4) = -2(-16x - 4y - 1)

Next, we can distribute the -2 to each term inside the parentheses:

-2(-16x - 4y - 1) = 32x + 8y + 2

Therefore, -2(x + 12y - 5 - 17x - 16y + 4) simplified is 32x + 8y + 2.

The simplified expression is 32x + 8y + 2.

Simplification of an algebrai expression can be defined as the process of writing an expression in the most efficient and compact form without affecting the value of the original expression.

The process entails collecting like terms, which implies adding or subtracting terms in an expression.

Simplify the expression -2(x + 12y - 5 - 17x - 16y + 4).

First, let's distribute the -2 to each term inside the parentheses:

-2(x) + (-2)(12y) - (-2)(5) - (-2)(17x) - (-2)(16y) + (-2)(4)

Now we'll multiply: -2x - 24y + 10 + 34x + 32y - 8

Next, we'll combine like terms:

(-2x + 34x) + (-24y + 32y) + (10 - 8)

The result is 32x + 8y + 2

Learn more about expression in math at

https://brainly.com/question/30091997

#SPJ11