Answer:
Seven decades after the end of World War II and a quarter-century after the end of the Cold War, roughly seven-in-ten Americans see Germany as a reliable ally, and about six-in-ten Germans trust the United States, according to a Pew Research Center survey. A majority of Germans believe it is more important for Germany to have strong ties with the United States than with Russia. Germans also give U.S. President Barack Obama high marks for his management of the U.S.-German relationship. And Germans and Americans are equally wary of international entanglements and want their countries to focus on domestic problems.
But Germans and Americans do not see eye-to-eye on salient points in the history of the postwar alliance, nor about some of the key issues in its future. For Americans, the most important event in U.S.-German relations over the past 75 years remains World War II and the Holocaust. Germans are less unanimous in their views of historical importance, but to the extent that one event stands out it is the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall. In the eyes of most Americans, the “special relationship” with Britain is still stronger than that with Germany. Americans want Germany to play a more active military role in the world, but Germans emphatically disagree. Americans think that neither the European Union nor the U.S. is being tough enough in dealing with Russia on the issue of Ukraine. A plurality of Germans believes the handling of Russia is about right. And, while half of Americans voice the view that a free trade agreement between the EU and the U.S. would be a good thing, only about four-in-ten Germans agree.
These are among the main findings of Pew Research Center surveys conducted in the U.S. among 1,003 people from February 26 to March 1, 2015, and in Germany among 963 people February 24-25, 2015. All interviews were done by telephone. The survey was conducted in association with the Bertelsmann Foundation.
Explanation:
thanks true plsss follow me❤️
Explain why do you think the amendment you chose is most important?
Answer:
I think the 1st amendment is the most important
Explanation:
I think its the most important because its the basis for our most important freedoms. If we didn't have the 1st amendment, we would be able to be arrested just for speaking and may not be able to follow the religion of our choice and we could be banned from protesting. The 1st amendment is needed to help secure our most precious freedoms and by far the most important
The Great Depression can best be described as a time when ________________.
people made a lot of money and spent a lot of money
lots of factories, stores, and businesses were hiring new workers
banks and factories closed and people were out of work
new banks were opening and lending money to people
Answer:
banks and factories closed and people were out of work
Answer:
Banks and factories closed and people were out of work
How did national and global events shape the ways Texas changed in the first decades after World War II?
Manufacturing increased fourfold, the permanent population increased, and the urbanization and modernization of Texas were well underway. Many military installations closed at the end of the war, and some wartime boomtowns were all but abandoned. Because of World War II, the face of Texas changed forever.
The fact that Brutus is unsure of whether or not he should participate in the conspiracy is an example of
a. internal conflict
b. foreshadowing
c.external conflict
d. aside
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
This situation represents an internal conflict of Brutus where he struggles to decide whether he should participate or not in the conspiracy. This situation is faced by an individual when he/she is struggling with an emotional issue.
Hence, option A is correct
Percentage of Farmers in Labor Force in Commercial Agriculture.
Why was the Tenure of Office Act important to the Radical Republicans?
Answer:
Passed by the 39 congress on March 2, 1867, it was used as the legal premise for impeaching President Andrew Johnson, whose Reconstruction policies were unpopular with the Radical Republicans in Congress. It was repealed in 1887 and declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1926.
Explanation:
- Eijiro <3
Describe the qualities that made buffalo hard to hunt.
Answer:
Bison can run very quickly and have thick outer skin making them difficult to hunt
Explanation:
Answer:
When buffalo became confused, they often did not run. Buffalo hunters took advantage of this and could kill many at a time because they stood still
Explanation: took the test
Knowing which direction is east, west, north, or south on a map is
In what ways did South Carolina participate in the events that led to the American Revolution?
Please make this in your own words!
Answer:
When the British attacked Lexington and Concord in the spring of 1775 and were beaten back by the Massachusetts Patriots, South Carolina rallied to support the American Revolution. Loyalists and Patriots of the colony were split by nearly 50/50.
Explanation:
What does ""self-determination"" mean for Farmer and Carmichael and Hamilton?
Answer:
The answer of this question is,
Explanation:
Self determination for farmers, carmichael and hamilton is that type of determination which are taken by the farmers for their own profit or income.
Explain how a juror’s bias could affect the outcome of a case.
Answer:
Some of the ways bias can affect criminal trials includes: How jurors see defendants. Certain biases can make jurors more or less sympathetic to a particular defendant. The most obvious example is race.
Brainliest please!
Answer:
the person above me is correct
Explanation:
just helping them get brainliest
15. What were Herbert Hoover's attitude/actions toward the Great
Depression? How did he feel government should handle it?
Herbert Hoover had a very relaxed attitude towards the great depression. He believed that it would go away with time. He also thought that instead of government programs to help people, such as welfare, charities and churches should be taking care of people, not the government. Essentially he didn't think the government should be handling it. Over time, it became obvious that charities and churches could not help the millions of people in need that were starving and homeless. He enacted a few government programs but by then it was too late. The depression had lasted far too long, and people were done with him. He lost his reelection to Franklin Roosevelt.
SOMEONE HELP ME WITH ME THIS PLEASE
what’s the message of the cartoon?
Answer:
I think it means that Hitlers party found a way out of/around the treaty. However it could also be showing that the treaty was just weakly enforced. Either one of those is arguably right, or you could just say both.
Explanation:
What did the Supreme Court rule in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden?
A. Only the federal government had the right to control interstate commerce.
B. States had power over the national government in matters involving taxation.
C. A state could not tax a national bank.
D. A state had the right to control its own commerce.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Only the federal government had the right to control interstate commerce.
Explanation:
This case began because New York gave one man a monopoly over the Hudson River, which runs through more than just NY. The case ended up in The Supreme Court with John Marshall as Chief Justice. In the constitution, it stated that the federal government had power over the state government. This meant that the states could not do anything to override the federal government. So, in the end, it was decided that only the federal government could control trade between or across states.
How did citizens take part in the running of their polis?
Answer:
done
Explanation:
If people wanted to move into a polis, they would need a citizenship. There were two types of democracy, direct democracy and representative democracy. Direct democracy is when citizens take part in the every day affairs of the government.
Why would a unanimous decision on the Linda Brown case "carry more weight than a divided one?
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional. Brown v. Board of Education was one of the cornerstones of the civil rights movement, and helped establish the precedent that “separate-but-equal” education and other services were not, in fact, equal at all.
Separate But Equal Doctrine
In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that racially segregated public facilities were legal, so long as the facilities for Black people and whites were equal.
The ruling constitutionally sanctioned laws barring African Americans from sharing the same buses, schools and other public facilities as whites—known as “Jim Crow” laws—and established the “separate but equal” doctrine that would stand for the next six decades.
But by the early 1950s, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was working hard to challenge segregation laws in public schools, and had filed lawsuits on behalf of plaintiffs in states such as South Carolina, Virginia and Delaware.
In the case that would become most famous, a plaintiff named Oliver Brown filed a class-action suit against the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, in 1951, after his daughter, Linda Brown, was denied entrance to Topeka’s all-white elementary schools.
In his lawsuit, Brown claimed that schools for Black children were not equal to the white schools, and that segregation violated the so-called “equal protection clause” of the 14th Amendment, which holds that no state can “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
The case went before the U.S. District Court in Kansas, which agreed that public school segregation had a “detrimental effect upon the colored children” and contributed to “a sense of inferiority,” but still upheld the “separate but equal” doctrine.
READ MORE: The Family That Fought School Segregation 8 Years Before Brown v. Board of Ed
Brown v. Board of Education Verdict
When Brown’s case and four other cases related to school segregation first came before the Supreme Court in 1952, the Court combined them into a single case under the name Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Thurgood Marshall, the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, served as chief attorney for the plaintiffs. (Thirteen years later, President Lyndon B. Johnson would appoint Marshall as the first Black Supreme Court justice.)
At first, the justices were divided on how to rule on school segregation, with Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson holding the opinion that the Plessy verdict should stand. But in September 1953, before Brown v. Board of Education was to be heard, Vinson died, and President Dwight D. Eisenhower replaced him with Earl Warren, then governor of California.
Displaying considerable political skill and determination, the new chief justice succeeded in engineering a unanimous verdict against school segregation the following year.
In the decision, issued on May 17, 1954, Warren wrote that “in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place,” as segregated schools are “inherently unequal.” As a result, the Court ruled that the plaintiffs were being “deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”
Little Rock Nine
In its verdict, the Supreme Court did not specify how exactly schools should be integrated, but asked for further arguments about it.
In May 1955, the Court issued a second opinion in the case (known as Brown v. Board of Education II), which remanded future desegregation cases to lower federal courts and directed district courts and school boards to proceed with desegregation “with all deliberate speed.”
Though well intentioned, the Court’s actions effectively opened the door to local judicial and political evasion of desegregation. While Kansas and some other states acted in accordance with the verdict, many school and local officials in the South defied it.
In one major example, Governor Orval Faubus of Arkansas called out the state National Guard to prevent Black students from attending high school in Little Rock in 1957. After a tense standoff, President Eisenhower deployed federal troops, and nine students—known as the “Little Rock Nine”—were able to enter Central High School under armed guard.
READ MORE: Why Eisenhower Sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock After Brown v. Board
Impact of Brown v. Board of Education
Though the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board didn’t achieve school desegregation on its own, the ruling (and the steadfast resistance to it across the South) fueled the nascent civil rights movement in the United States.
Why didn’t Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Sukarno in Indonesia align with the US or USSR? What advantages did that give them?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.
Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Sukarno in Indonesia didn't align with the US or USSR because they were firm believers in the foreign policy of neutrality. They had no special ties or preferences for the Soviet Union or the United States.
The advantage that this gave them was to remain neutral in the face of conflict, which they thought was positive to bring peace to the region during the Cold War years.
These two countries were part of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) that played a key role during the Cold War Years to help bring peace and stabilization
The NAM organization started in 1955 due to the Asia-Africa Conference of Bandung, Indonesia, to the initiative of Asian and African countries such as India, Pakistan, Burma, Indonesia, Ghana, and Ceylon.
What was the sectional interest of American settlers in the West?
A. Westerners wanted cheap land and good transportation.
B. Westerners wanted an alliance with Mexico to help control Native Americans,
C. Westerners wanted free land and government grants.
D. Westerners wanted gold as their currency.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
In what ways can you see the influence of the New Imperialism on the relationship between Asian nations and Western nations in today's world? You will need to fully discuss at least 2 ways in which Asian nations' relationships with Western nations have been affected by the New Imperialism. Be sure to include historical facts for each of your explanations. Explanations must be fully made and not be mere references.
Answer:
what exactly is it about?
Explanation:
Do you think the Sedition Acts violated first amendment rights? Why or why not?
Answer:
The Republican minority in Congress complained that the Sedition Act violated the First Amendment to the Constitution, which protected freedom of speech and freedom of the press. ... Both argued that the federal government did not have the authority to enact laws not specified in the constitution.
Explanation:
The Court took this opportunity to officially declare the Sedition Act of 1798, which had expired over 150 years earlier, unconstitutional: “the Act, because of the restraint it imposed upon criticism of government and public officials, was inconsistent with the First AmendmentThomas Cooper, a lawyer and newspaper editor in Sunbury, Pennsylvania, was indicted, prosecuted, and convicted of violating the Sedition Act after he published a broadside that was sharply critical of President Adams.The Republican minority in Congress complained that the Sedition Act violated the First Amendment to the Constitution, which protected freedom of speech and freedom of the press. ... Both argued that the federal government did not have the authority to enact laws not specified in the constitution
I need help with this
i this it should be a true
Need help with this question!!!
If the 14 amendments guaranteed citizenship, why do you think the 15th was necessary?
Prevention of Illegal Squatting Act of 1951- This law made it a requirement to carry passes identifying what race they belonged to and made it illegal for people to live or travel through cities and towns without special passes.
You have been forced to move. There is a good job in another town but you need a special pass to go into that town. Also, your grandmother who lives in the other town is sick and you need to take care of her. What would you do?
Answer:
I would still go to the new town, with the passes I currently have, I will then go to the Public office in which handles these things, and request a new one, once approved, go to my grandmother, if you're not approved, I'll still go, and when I am arrested challenge it in the Supreme court.
How do special interest groups legally shape public policy?
A. by lobbying officials
B. by paying candidates
C. by enacting regulations
D. by passing tax cuts
Answer:
I guess it's (A) by lobbying officials.
Answer:
The answer is... by lobbying officials
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :D
How does Lin-Manuel Miranda's Hamilton embody the spirit of America then and now?
Answer:
Let me answer you...
Explanation:
Miranda began working on "Hamilton" in 2009. He was inspired to write a hip-hop musical about founding father Alexander Hamilton after reading the 2004 biography "Alexander Hamilton" by historian Ron Chernow. ... "It was, he thought, a hip-hop story, an immigrant's story."
Question: What is implied about the fact that only men were given long names? And why were women given all the same name? What does that say about Roman gender hierarchy? (Ancient Rome)
Answer:
It shows that they saw men as more important than women.
Explanation:
If men were given longer names and women were all the same then that shows how they wanted the men to be recognized individually.
How were the Mauryan and Gupta Empires different?
A.
Unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas collected taxes from districts and villages.
B.
Unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas established a central government that allowed local rule.
C.
Unlike the Guptas, the Mauryans established a central government that allowed local rule.
D.
Unlike the Guptas, the Mauryans encouraged construction of public works.
E.
Unlike the Guptas, the Mauryans encouraged the caste system to form a stable government.
The Mauryan and Gupta Empires were different in several ways. One of the differences between the Mauryan and Gupta Empires is that, unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas collected taxes from districts and villages. option A is correct.
Option B is incorrect because the Guptas didn't establish a central government that allowed local rule; instead, they maintained a highly centralized government. Option C is also incorrect because the Mauryans didn't establish a central government that allowed local rule; rather, they maintained a centralized government.
Option D is incorrect because both the Mauryans and Guptas encouraged the construction of public works. Option E is incorrect because both the Mauryans and Guptas relied on a stable government, but they had different ways of achieving it.The Mauryan Empire, which existed from about 322 BCE to 185 BCE, was an ancient Indian empire that was centralized.
The empire was established by Chandragupta Maurya, who defeated Alexander the Great's successors, the Seleucids. Emperor Ashoka was one of the most significant Mauryan emperors. The Gupta Empire was an ancient Indian empire that existed from about 320 CE to 550 CE. The Guptas had a highly centralized administration, and their empire was more extensive than the Mauryans.
The correct option is A.
For more question The Mauryan
https://brainly.com/question/12001220
#SPJ8
What does the tape chart tell you about the speed of the car
Answer:
Speed is the rate at which an object's position changes, measured in meters per second. The equation for speed is simple: distance divided by time. You take the distance traveled (for example 3 meters), and divide it by the time (three seconds) to get the speed (one meter per second).
Could you please help me with the recent question of mine unanswered on my page? I will give u brainliest and 20 points! :))) X
what is the short answer to this question
Answer: Explanation I agree