Effects of the Black Death on European Populations
Start of the Black Death
Population (in millions of people
1500
1600
1700
1300 1400
Year
O A 1500 - 1600
B 1300 - 1400
C 1400 - 1500
R 1200 - 1300

Answer:

the one you choose is correct, its turkey!

Explanation:

I hope this helps:)

☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️

Answer: The Townshend Acts would use the revenue raised by the duties to pay the salaries of colonial governors and judges, ensuring the loyalty of America's governmental officials to the British Crown

Answer:

the British were fighting in a hostile country over difficult terrain, with long lines of communications, while the Boers, mainly on the defensive, were able to use modern rifle fire to good effect at a time when attacking forces had no means of overcoming it.

Explanation:just did that question

Answer:

In simple terms, fascism is defined as a government structure where one dictator has complete control of the entire country, state, or territory. Anyone who opposes this dictator is suppressed and individual rights are often oppressed.

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

I think it is A

Explanation:

because the statement praizez about the emperor justinian

Answer:

It's 1,2,5

Explanation:

Answer:

ABE

Explanation:

Answer:Commitees

Explanation:

Answer:

Congress to pass a resolution

Answer:

The civilizations usually include Egypt, Carthage, Axum, Numidia, and Nubia, but may also be extended to the prehistoric Land of Punt and others: the Empire of Ashanti, Kingdom of Kongo, Empire of Mali, Kingdom of Zimbabwe, Songhai Empire, the Empire of Ghana, Bono state and Kingdom of Beni

Answer: political authorities in Western Europe did over the Catholic Church. ... declined precipitously following the collapse of the Roman Empire in the fifth century, only to ... The survival of a powerful imperials state in the Byzantine Empire resulted in ... The Eastern Orthodox faith expanded into Eastern Europe when the Byzantine.

Answer:

PENIS IN MY BUTTHOLES

Explanation:

what did Common Sense mean to Thomas Paine?

"Common Sense" allowed Thomas to set forth his arguments in favor of American Independence.

Why was it so?

“Common Sense” advocated independence for the American colonies from Britain. He used pamphlets because in the 16th century, they were an important medium for the spread of ideas.

3 pieces of evidence:

"Male and female are the distinctions of nature, good and bad, the distinctions of heaven; but how a man too timorous to be wealthy."

"But there is another and greater distinction, for which no natural or religious reason can be assigned, and that is, the distinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECTS."

"Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively, by uniting our affections;..."

I'm sorry I don't the evidence is correct but I tried, I did.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

The Louisiana Purchase widely influenced the economic development of the United States. The purchase caused the economy to boost substantially because of many factors. It essentially doubled the size of the United States and allowed plenty of Americans to migrate west.

Explanation:

umm...well uhh...because i said so

Answer:

ha guess  you shouldve payed attention in class :))

Explanation:

Answer:

The Latin chronicles of the First Crusade in the early 11th century, called the Western Christians that came from many countries of Europe Franci irrespective of their ethnicity. Byzantine Greek sources use Frangoi and Arabic al-Ifranj. Alternatively, the chronicles applied the collective designation Latini, or Latins.

Explanation:

hope it helps

Answer:

How did the Great Depression affect the American economy? In the United States, where the Depression was generally worst, industrial production between 1929 and 1933 fell by nearly 47 percent, gross domestic product (GDP) declined by 30 percent, and unemployment reached more than 20 percent.

Answer:

I just did the assignment it was a, b, and d i promise

Explanation:

Answer:

a b d got it right on edge

Explanation:

Answer:

its b

Explanation:

just took the test on edg

The middle colonies more tolerant than New England because the middle colonies allowed for more religious freedom and were centers of immigration. Thus, the option (b) is correct.

What is middle colonies?

The term “middle colonies” refers to the area located midway between the New England Colonies and the Southern Colonies. The Middle Colonies are included in thirteen colonies, such as New York, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.

Due to the wide range of religious practices, the middle colonies were more tolerant than New England. The middle colonies, which served as hubs for immigration, allowed a greater diversity of people to accept religious freedom. More freedom in terms of politics and religion is enjoyed in the middle colonies.

As a result, the middle colonies are tolerant than New England colonies because of diversity of the religious freedom. Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on middle colonies, here:

https://brainly.com/question/3699840

#SPJ2

Answer:

How did increasing radicalism and violence in Kansas foreshadow future conflict? It foreshadowed the civil war because of the radicalism the United States were divided between proslavery and antislavery. ... No he was not justified in his violence he killed men that didn't even have slaves.

c. im from there so its c and eather or a

Answer:

D It created two separate worlds that kept blacks and, in many cases, poor whites, from interacting at all.

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

Answer:

a man.

Explanation:

Abe Lincolin

Answer:

b

Explanation:

maybe! because it seems like i saw this at the news paper

Answer:

To keep their country safe

Explanation:

Answer: I think the purpose of the Government is to maintain order and provide security, establish justice, protect citizens from external threats, promote the general welfare by providing public services, and too make rules and laws.

hope this helps!

For generations, Jews across the globe have embraced a common, master narrative of Jewish migration in modern times that traces its origins to widespread acts of anti-Jewish violence, often referred to as pogroms, that propelled millions of Jews from the dark hinterlands of Eastern Europe into the warm, supportive embrace of their current, “Western” societies, ranging from the United States to Israel to Australia. In North America, Israel, and other new (or at the very least renewed) Jewish communities, definitive bastions of Jewish memory, society, and culture – like The National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia and Beit Hatfutsot: The Museum of the Jewish People on Tel Aviv University's campus – tell and retell a widely-accepted narrative of Jewish migration in which Jews who flee violence and oppression in Eastern Europe are rescued, if not saved, by the very act of migration. In these, and innumerable other cases, Jewish migration in the modern era is repeatedly presented as a willful act of secular self-salvation. Mirroring and at times even bolstering the story of the biblical Exodus from ancient Egypt, these modern, secular versions of traditional Jewish accounts of slavery, flight, and redemption repeatedly serve as fundamental components of contemporary Jewish society, culture, and self.

In response to the prevailing influence of these and related myths of Jewish crisis, flight, and rescue, scholars as definitive as Salo Baron have long argued that the predominance of the so-called lachrymose conception of Jewish history ultimately warps popular and academic conceptions of both the Jewish past and present. As Baron noted in a retrospective essay first published in 1963: “[ … ] an overemphasis on Jewish sufferings distorted the total picture of the Jewish historic evolution and, at the same time, badly served a generation which had become impatient with the nightmare of endless persecutions and massacres.”1 Despite these and related attempts to revise the lachrymose conception of Jewish history as well as the large-scale social, political, and economic changes that have changed the very face of Jewish society over the past century and a half, the traditional historical paradigm of persecution, flight, and refuge continues to shape popular and even scholarly accounts of Jewish migration and history in modern times.2 The continued salience of this master narrative touches upon several key methodological questions in the study of Jewish migration and history. The first issue that the prominent place of anti-Jewish persecution and violence raises is the problematic, long-debated place of antisemitism as both a defining characteristic and driving force in the long course of Jewish history.3 A second issue related to the prominent place of anti-Jewish violence in popular and academic interpretations of Jewish history, in particular, and of European history, in general, is a parallel tendency to view the vast terrain of Eastern Europe as an area pre-destined to, if not defined by, inter-ethnic tensions, hatred, and violence.4 Lastly, the persecution, flight, and rescue narrative of Jewish migration and history very often ends up bolstering triumphalist views of the Jewish present, whether they be embraced and touted in New York, Tel Aviv, or Toronto.

Answer:

God

Explanation:

God "made" Jesus

Answer:

I mean god

Explanation:

Answer:

They grieved his death and began a war with France to try to protect the monarchy.

Explanation:

Answer:

They grieved his death and began a war with France to try to protect monarchy.

Explanation: