(b) The aluminium wire will break if the tension in the wire exceeds 350N.


The wire is attached to the flagpole at B, 0. 8 m from the wall.


The wire is at an angle of 20° to the flagpole.


Assess whether the wire will break. You should use the principle of moments, taking


moments about 0.


length of flagpole = 1. 2m


mass of flagpole and flag = 15 kg

The larger fragment moves at 1/25th the velocity of the smaller fragment.

By conservation of momentum, the total momentum of the system before and after the explosion must be equal. Since the shell is initially at rest, the total initial momentum is zero. After the explosion, the two fragments move in opposite directions with different velocities. Let the mass of the smaller fragment be m and the mass of the larger fragment be 25m. Then, by conservation of momentum:

0 = mv + (25m)(-v')

0 = v - 25v'

where v and v' are the velocities of the smaller and larger fragments, respectively, after the explosion. Solving for v', we get:

v' = v/25

Since the total kinetic energy of the system is also conserved, we can use the conservation of energy equation to solve for the velocities of the two fragments. Let E be the total kinetic energy of the system after the explosion. Then:

E = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)(25m)(v/25)^2

E = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)mv^2

E = mv^2

Therefore, the kinetic energy of the system after the explosion is equal to the kinetic energy of the smaller fragment before the explosion. Using this, we can solve for the velocity of the smaller fragment:

E = (1/2)mv^2

v = sqrt(2E/m)

And the velocity of the larger fragment is:

v' = v/25 = sqrt(2E/m)/25

So, the ratio of the velocities of the two fragments is:

v'/v = (sqrt(2E/m)/25) / sqrt(2E/m) = 1/25

To know more about momentum refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30487676#

#SPJ11

Answer:

setting a stationary body in motion.

Explanation:

like a stationary car will start moving when driving force is applied

The Force acting downwards on the mass = 14.72N

To determine the force acting downwards on a mass of 1500 g suspended on a string, you'll need to use the formula for gravitational force: F = m * g, where F is the force, m is the mass in kilograms, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s²).

First, convert the mass from grams to kilograms: 1500 g = 1.5 kg.

Next, plug the values into the formula: F = 1.5 kg * 9.81 m/s² ≈ 14.72 N.

So, the force acting downwards on the mass is approximately 14.72 N.

Visit https://brainly.com/question/30526425 to learn more about Force

#SPJ11

A simple circuit has a 20 Ω resistor and carries 0. 3 A. The voltage of the power source is 6 V.  In a simple circuit with only one resistor, the voltage across the resistor is equal to the voltage of the power source.

Using Ohm's law, we can determine the voltage of the power source by multiplying the resistance (R) of the circuit by the current (I) flowing through it. Thus, we have:

V = IR

Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]V = (0.3 A)(20\; \Omega) = 6 V[/tex]

Therefore, the voltage of the power source in the circuit is 6 volts. In a simple circuit with only one resistor, the voltage across the resistor is equal to the voltage of the power source.

This is because the sum of the voltages across all the components in the circuit must equal the total voltage of the power source, due to the conservation of energy.

It's important to note that in real-world circuits, the voltage of the power source can fluctuate due to various factors such as fluctuations in the electrical grid or changes in the internal resistance of the power source itself.

To know more about resistors refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31258648#

#SPJ11

Jake wants to prove the theorem that states that the measure of the opposite angles of a quadrilateral add up to 180 degrees.

This theorem is also known as the "opposite angles theorem." To prove this, Jake could use several methods, including the use of geometric proofs, algebraic proofs, or even visual aids such as diagrams or sketches.

One way to approach the proof would be to divide the quadrilateral into two triangles and show that the sum of the angles in each triangle equals 180 degrees.

Jake could then use this information to prove that the opposite angles of the quadrilateral add up to 180 degrees as well. Another approach would be to use the properties of parallel lines and transversals to show that the opposite angles are supplementary (i.e., add up to 180 degrees).

Regardless of the method used, the opposite angles theorem is a fundamental concept in geometry that is used to solve a variety of problems involving quadrilaterals.

To learn more about geometry, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/31408211

#SPJ11

In the first scenario, heat transfers from hot water to a cold metal sphere until they reach thermal equilibrium. In the second scenario, heat and radiation occur from a hot rock to a metal container with no air until they reach thermal equilibrium.

For the scenario where a cold metal sphere is placed in hot water:

(a) The type of energy transfer is heat transfer.

(b) The transfer will occur from the hot water to the cold metal sphere, resulting in a decrease in the temperature of the water and an increase in the temperature of the sphere.

(c) The heat energy from the water will flow to the sphere until the two objects reach a state of thermal equilibrium, meaning they are at the same temperature. This occurs because heat naturally flows from hotter objects to cooler ones.

For the scenario where a hot rock is placed in a metal container with all the air removed:

(a) The type of energy transfer is both heat transfer and radiation.

(b) Heat transfer will occur from the hot rock to the metal container, while radiation will occur from the rock to the surrounding environment.

(c) The hot rock will lose heat energy to the metal container until they reach thermal equilibrium. Additionally, as the rock cools, it will emit electromagnetic radiation in the form of infrared waves. Because there is no air in the container, convection, another form of heat transfer, cannot occur.

To know more about thermal equilibrium refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14556352#

#SPJ11

The  soft iron is a magnetic material hence it became an induced magnet and attracted the blade.What is a magnetic substance?The term magnetic substances is a substance that can be attracted b a magnet. Now we know that the  soft iron is amagnetic material hence it became an induced magnet and attracted the blade.Recall that a magnetic substance is a substance that can be attracted by a magnet. Wood can not be attracted by a magnet but soft iron cash attracted by a magnet hence it is a magnetic substance.This is not possible in the case of thewooden block since it is not magnetic as such the the razor blade on the wooden block was attracted to the magnet while the other on the soft iron was not.

(a). The thermal efficiency is approximately 22.9%.

(b). The heat discarded in each cycle is approximately 1.6063 × [tex]10^6[/tex] J.

(c). The mass of fuel burned in each cycle is approximately 0.035 kg.

(d). The engine's power output is approximately 222 kW or 297.6 hp.

To solve this problem, let's use the following formulas and conversions:

Given:

Heat input (Qin) = 1.61 × [tex]10^6[/tex]J

Work done per cycle (W) = 3700 J

Heat of combustion of gasoline (H) = 4.60 × [tex]10^7[/tex] J/kg

Cycles per second (f) = 60.0 cycles/s

(a) To calculate the thermal efficiency:

Thermal efficiency (η) = (Useful work output / Heat input) * 100%

η = (W / Qin) * 100%

η = (3700 J / 1.61 × 10^6 J) * 100%

η ≈ 0.229 * 100%

η ≈ 22.9%

(b) To calculate the heat discarded in each cycle:

Heat discarded = Heat input - Useful work output

Heat discarded = Qin - W

Heat discarded = 1.61 × [tex]10^6[/tex] J - 3700 J

Heat discarded ≈ 1.6063 × [tex]10^6[/tex] J

(c) To calculate the mass of fuel burned in each cycle:

Heat input = Heat of combustion * Mass of fuel burned

Mass of fuel burned = Heat input / Heat of combustion

Mass of fuel burned = 1.61 × [tex]10^6[/tex] J / 4.60 × [tex]10^7[/tex] J/kg

Mass of fuel burned ≈ 0.035 kg

(d) To calculate the power output in kilowatts and horsepower:

Power output (P) = Work done per cycle * Number of cycles per second

P = W * f

P = 3700 J * 60.0 cycles/s

P = 2.22 × [tex]10^5[/tex] J/s

Power output in kilowatts:

P(kW) = P / 1000

P(kW) ≈ 2.22 × [tex]10^5[/tex] J/s / 1000

P(kW) ≈ 222 kW

Power output in horsepower:

P(hp) = P / 745.7

P(hp) ≈ 2.22 × [tex]10^5[/tex] J/s / 745.7

P(hp) ≈ 297.6 hp

To know more about thermal efficiency refer here

https://brainly.com/question/13039990#

#SPJ11

The work done in pushing the 80 kg box 2 meters across the surface with a 1400 N force applied parallel to the surface is 2800 Joules.

To find the work done, we need to consider the force applied, the displacement, and the angle between them.

In this case, the force (F) applied is 1400 N, the displacement (d) is 2 meters, and since the force is applied parallel to the horizontal surface, the angle (θ) between the force and the displacement is 0 degrees. The formula to calculate work (W) is:

W = F × d × cos(θ)

Now, let's substitute the given values:

W = 1400 N × 2 m × cos(0°)

Since cos(0°) = 1, the equation becomes:

W = 1400 N × 2 m × 1

W = 2800 J (Joules)

So, the work done in pushing the 80 kg box 2 meters across the surface with a 1400 N force applied parallel to the surface is 2800 Joules.

Learn more about work at: https://brainly.com/question/3714635

#SPJ11

You have to lift the 10kg bag of salt approximately 2.55 meters to do 250J of work.

To determine how far you have to lift a 10kg bag of salt to do 250J of work, we need to use the work-energy theorem and the formula for gravitational potential energy. The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its potential energy. The formula for gravitational potential energy is:

PE = m * g * h

where PE is the potential energy, m is the mass (10kg), g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s²), and h is the height the object is lifted.

Since the work done is 250J, we can set the potential energy equal to the work done:

250J = 10kg * 9.8 m/s² * h

Now, we need to solve for h:

250J = 98 kg*m/s² * h
h = 250J / 98 kg*m/s²
h ≈ 2.55 meters

For more about work:

https://brainly.com/question/18094932

#SPJ11

The potential energy of the car at the top of the hill is 1.75 x 10^6 J. If we neglect friction, the car will have a speed of 74.7 m/s as it rolls down the hill.

a. To find the potential energy of the car at the top of the hill, we need to use the formula:

potential energy = mass x gravity x height

where mass is given as 2.0 x 103 kg, gravity is approximately 9.8 m/s^2, and height is the vertical distance the car is lifted up the hill. We can find this distance by using the angle of 15 and the horizontal distance of 345 m. The vertical distance is given by:

height = 345 m x sin(15) = 90.3 m

Plugging in these values, we get:

potential energy = (2.0 x 103 kg) x (9.8 m/s^2) x (90.3 m) = 1.75 x 10^6 J

So the potential energy of the car at the top of the hill is 1.75 x 10^6 J.

b. To find the speed of the car as it rolls down the hill, we can use the conservation of energy principle:

potential energy at top = kinetic energy at bottom

At the top of the hill, the car has only potential energy, which we found to be 1.75 x 10^6 J. At the bottom of the hill, the car has only kinetic energy, which we can find using the formula:

kinetic energy = 0.5 x mass x velocity^2

where mass is still 2.0 x 103 kg, and velocity is what we are trying to find. Setting the potential energy at the top equal to the kinetic energy at the bottom, we get:

1.75 x 10^6 J = 0.5 x (2.0 x 103 kg) x velocity^2

Solving for velocity, we get:

velocity = sqrt( (2 x 1.75 x 10^6 J) / (2.0 x 103 kg) ) = 74.7 m/s

So if we neglect friction, the car will have a speed of 74.7 m/s as it rolls down the hill.

Learn more about potential energy here:-

https://brainly.com/question/24284560

#SPJ11

The required wavelength to cause sunburn on human skin by breaking a chemical bond is 3.56 x 10⁻⁷ meters

Use the equation E=hc/λ, where E is the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and λ is the wavelength.

First, convert the energy of the photon to joules (J) from electron volts (eV):

3.5 eV x 1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ J/eV = 5.61 x 10⁻¹⁹ J

Next, substitute the values into the equation:

5.61 x 10¹⁹ J = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J s)(3.0 x 10⁸ m/s)/λ

Solving for λ:

λ = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J s)(3.0 x 10⁸ m/s)/(5.61 x 10⁻¹⁹ J) = 3.56 x 10⁻⁷ m

Therefore, the required wavelength is approximately 3.56 x 10⁻⁷ meters (or 356 nanometers), which falls in the ultraviolet (UV) region of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Find out more on sunburn here: https://brainly.com/question/26609703

#SPJ1

Answer:

less than 10 m/s

Explanation:

The 1 kg ball moves after the elastic collision, so you know its speed is > 0.

Due to the law of conservation of momentum, you know the total momentum before the collision must equal the total momentum after the collision.  Some of the momentum from the 4 kg ball transfers to the 1 kg ball (which is at rest) when they collide.  The 4 kg ball slows down after the collision and the lighter ball moves after the collision, but at a speed less than 10 m/s.

Answer:

(iii) Increasing the intensity of radiation would increase the number of photons hitting the surface per second. As a result, the number of electrons ejected per second would also increase, as the photoelectric effect is a stochastic process. However, the maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electrons would not change, as it depends solely on the frequency of the incident photons.

In terms of photons, increasing the intensity of radiation would mean an increase in the number of photons per unit area per second. This would increase the probability of a photon interacting with an electron and causing ejection.

(iv) Einstein's theory that light behaved as particles, or photons, was controversial in 1902 because it contradicted the established wave theory of light. Many physicists at the time believed that light waves were similar to sound waves, and that they propagated through a medium called the "luminiferous ether." Einstein's theory challenged this idea by suggesting that light was made up of discrete particles, or photons, with specific energies.

However, Einstein's theory was later supported by experiments such as the photoelectric effect, which demonstrated that light could indeed behave like particles. Furthermore, the theory of quantum mechanics developed in the early 20th century provided a more complete understanding of the dual nature of light, which can behave as both particles and waves. Today, the particle nature of light is widely accepted and is a standard concept in pre-university physics.

To stay in a circular orbit at a specific distance, the satellite must have a speed that is three times the square root of that distance. Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

The speed of a satellite in a circular orbit around a planet can be determined by equating the centripetal force required to keep the satellite in orbit with the gravitational force of the planet on the satellite.

The centripetal force is given by [tex]F = mv^2/r[/tex], where m is the mass of the satellite, v is its speed, and r is the distance from the center of the planet.

The gravitational force is given by [tex]F = G(Mm)/r^2[/tex], where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the planet, and m is the mass of the satellite. Equating these two forces and solving for v gives [tex]v = \sqrt{(GM/r)}[/tex]

Substituting the given values for g = 9 m/s² and r, we get [tex]v = \sqrt{(gr)}[/tex], which simplifies to [tex]v = \sqrt{(9r)} = 3\sqrt{r}[/tex].

Therefore, the correct answer is v = 3r. This means that the speed of the satellite must be three times the square root of the distance from the center of the planet to remain in a circular orbit at that distance.

To know more about satellite refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31661653#

#SPJ11

Compounds are chemically combined pure substances with new properties, while mixtures are physically combined substances that retain their individual properties.

Compare and contrast compounds and mixtures (select all that are true):

1. Compounds are pure substances, but mixtures are not.

This statement is true. Compounds are pure substances formed by the chemical combination of two or more elements in a fixed ratio, while mixtures are combinations of two or more substances that are not chemically combined and can be physically separated.

2. When two elements bond together into a compound they have new properties.
This statement is true.

When elements chemically bond to form a compound, they create a substance with unique properties different from the individual elements.

3. When two substances are mixed together in a mixture, they keep their individual properties.

This statement is true.

In a mixture, the substances retain their individual properties because they are not chemically combined.

4. Compounds are physically combined.

This statement is false.

Compounds are chemically combined, as elements form chemical bonds to create a compound with new properties.

5. Mixtures are chemically combined.

This statement is false.

Mixtures are physically combined, as the substances in a mixture are not chemically bonded and retain their individual properties.

In summary, compounds are chemically combined pure substances with new properties, while mixtures are physically combined substances that retain their individual properties.

To know more about compounds refer here

brainly.com/question/13516179#

#SPJ11

The power output of the man pulling the bar can be calculated as follows:

Power = Work / Time

The work done by the man is equal to the force he exerts multiplied by the distance he moves the weights:

Work = Force x Distance

The force he exerts is equal to the weight of the weights he is lifting:

Force = Weight x g

where g is the acceleration due to gravity, which is approximately 10 m/s^2.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

Force = 30 kg x 10 m/s^2 = 300 N

Work = Force x Distance = 300 N x 0.5 m = 150 J

Power = Work / Time = 150 J / 0.5 s = 300 W

Now we can check which of the other options exerts the same power output:

Option A:

Force = 25 kg x 10 m/s^2 = 250 N

Work = Force x Distance = 250 N x 2.4 m = 600 J

Power = Work / Time = 600 J / 2.0 s = 300 W

Option B:

Force = 45 kg x 10 m/s^2 = 450 N

Work = Force x Distance = 450 N x 2.4 m = 1080 J

Power = Work / Time = 1080 J / 3.0 s = 360 W

Option C:

Force = 45 kg x 10 m/s^2 = 450 N

Work = Force x Distance = 450 N x 0.5 m = 225 J

Power = Work / Time = 225 J / 0.5 s = 450 W

Option D:

Force = 30 kg x 10 m/s^2 = 300 N

Work = Force x Distance = 300 N x 0.5 m = 150 J

Power = Work / Time = 150 J / 1.5 s = 100 W

Therefore, options A and B exert the same power output as the man pulling the bar, while options C and D do not.

This is supported by the data in the tables, which show that the moon of Mars has a much smaller tidal force (0.2 m/s²) than the moon of Earth (2.2 m/s²).

Why is Mars unique from Earth?

The diameter of Earth is about twice that of Mars. Mars would be the size of a ping-pong ball if Earth were a baseball. While Mars has no liquid water, nearly 70% of Earth does. The surface of the Earth receives more than 100 degrees Fahrenheit of solar heating.

The difference in mass between Mars and Earth is a significant factor in the difference between the tidal forces each planet experiences. Since Mars is much less massive than Earth, it has much less gravity and therefore a weaker pull on its moons. This means that the moons of Mars are much less able to exert a tidal force on the planet. This is supported by the data in the tables, which show that the moon of Mars has a much smaller tidal force (0.2 m/s²) than the moon of Earth (2.2 m/s²).

To learn more about gravity use:

https://brainly.com/question/940770

#SPJ4

A 50.0 kg ice skater is standing at rest on the ice holding a 2.0 kg medicine ball. She throws the medicine ball to the right with a horizontal velocity of 1. 8 m/s.

Assuming there is no external force acting on the system, we can use conservation of momentum to solve this problem.

The initial momentum of the system is zero since the skater and the medicine ball are at rest. The final momentum of the system must also be zero since there are no external forces acting on it. This means that the momentum of the medicine ball to the right must be cancelled out by the momentum of the skater to the left.

Let v be the velocity of the skater after throwing the ball. By conservation of momentum

(2.0 kg)(1.8 m/s) = (50.0 kg + 2.0 kg) v

Simplifying

v = (2.0 kg)(1.8 m/s) / (50.0 kg + 2.0 kg)

v = 0.0643 m/s

Therefore, the skater's velocity after throwing the ball is 0.0643 m/s to the right.

To know more about horizontal velocity here

https://brainly.com/question/23478683

#SPJ4

Marshall's velocity while paddling his kayak across the lake was 1.53 meters per second, which can be calculated by dividing the distance he traveled by the time it took him to cover that distance.

Marshall's velocity can be calculated using the formula:

velocity = distance/time

Where distance is 919 meters and time is 10.0 minutes, which must be converted to seconds:

time = 10.0 minutes = 600 seconds

Substituting these values, we get:

velocity = 919 meters / 600 seconds

velocity = 1.53 meters per second

Therefore, Marshall's velocity was 1.53 meters per second.

To explain this, we can say that velocity is the rate of change of displacement over time, and in this case, Marshall traveled a distance of 919 meters over a period of 10.0 minutes.

By dividing the distance by the time, we can calculate his velocity, which tells us how fast he was traveling in meters per second.

In summary, Marshall's velocity while paddling his kayak across the lake was 1.53 meters per second, which can be calculated by dividing the distance he traveled by the time it took him to cover that distance.

To know more about velocity refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19979064#

#SPJ11

The charge of a particle in a magnetic field can be determined by measuring the force, velocity, and strength of the magnetic field using the Lorentz force equation. There are various methods to measure the charge, such as using a particle accelerator or mass spectrometer.

In a magnetic field, charged particles experience a force that can be used to determine their charge. This force, known as the Lorentz force, is given by the equation F = q(v x B), where F is the force, q is the charge of the particle, v is the velocity of the particle, and B is the strength of the magnetic field.

To determine the charge of a particle in a magnetic field, you can measure the velocity of the particle and the strength of the magnetic field, and then measure the force experienced by the particle. By rearranging the equation F = q(v x B), you can solve for the charge q.

It is important to note that the Lorentz force only applies to charged particles that are in motion. If the particle is stationary, it will not experience any force in a magnetic field.

In practice, there are many ways to measure the charge of a particle in a magnetic field, such as using a particle accelerator or a mass spectrometer. These techniques involve manipulating the motion of the particle in a controlled way and measuring the resulting forces and velocities to determine its charge.

To learn more about magnetic fields

https://brainly.com/question/3160109

#SPJ4

Complete question:

How can I know the charge of a particle in a magnetic field?

Explanation:

The average speed is equal to total distance over total time

The formula for distance is s=v×t

So the average speed would be:

v=(v1×t1)+(v2×t2)+(v3×t3)/t1+t2+t3

Now we can solve:

v=(54×20)+(36×30)+(18×10)/60s

v=2340/60

v=39km/h

If you need to convert to m/s, divide by 3.6 and you get 10.8333 m/s

Hope this helps!

The speed of the waves passing the anchored boat can be calculated using the formula Speed = Wavelength / Period. With a wavelength of 5 meters and a period of 2 seconds, the speed of the waves is 2.5 meters per second.

The speed of the waves can be determined by the formula:

Speed = Wavelength / Period

Where wavelength is the distance between two consecutive wave crests, and period is the time it takes for two consecutive wave crests to pass a fixed point (in this case, the anchored boat).

We know that the wavelength of the waves is 5 meters. We also know that the period is 2 seconds. Therefore:

Speed = 5 meters / 2 seconds = 2.5 meters/second

So the speed of the waves is 2.5 meters per second.

To learn more about wavelength

https://brainly.com/question/31143857

#SPJ4

a) Wind is the movement of air in the Earth's atmosphere. It occurs due to the uneven heating of the Earth's surface by the sun, resulting in the displacement of air from areas of high pressure to areas of low pressure. Wind can occur at various speeds and directions, and it plays a crucial role in weather patterns and climate.

b) Wind energy is a form of kinetic energy that is possessed by the movement of air molecules. This energy can be harnessed to generate electricity through the use of wind turbines.

The process of generating electricity from wind energy involves the following steps:

1. Wind turbines are installed in areas where there is a consistent and strong wind flow. These turbines consist of large blades that are connected to a rotor.

2. When wind flows over the blades, it causes the rotor to spin. The rotation of the rotor generates mechanical energy.

3. This mechanical energy is then converted into electrical energy through the use of a generator.

4. The electrical energy is then transmitted to a power grid, where it can be distributed to homes and businesses.

c) There are several advantages of using wind energy for generating electricity, including:

1. Renewable: Wind energy is a renewable resource, which means it is replenished naturally and can be used indefinitely without depleting natural resources.

2. Clean: Wind energy does not produce harmful pollutants or greenhouse gas emissions, making it a clean and environmentally friendly source of energy.

d) There are also limitations to using wind energy for generating electricity, including:

1. Variability: Wind energy is not a consistent source of energy, as wind speeds can vary depending on weather patterns and time of day. This can make it difficult to rely on wind energy as a sole source of electricity.

2. Land use: Wind turbines require a significant amount of land, which can be problematic in areas with limited space or where wildlife habitats may be affected.

To know more about Wind energy refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29293441#

#SPJ11

Answer:We can use the kinematic equation:

v = vo + at

where:

v = final velocity (what we want to find)

vo = initial velocity (which is zero since the ball is dropped)

a = acceleration due to gravity (-9.8 m/s^2, negative since it is acting in the opposite direction of the ball's motion)

t = time (4 seconds)

Substituting the values, we get:

v = 0 + (-9.8 m/s^2)(4 s)

v = -39.2 m/s

Note that the negative sign indicates that the ball is moving downward.

Explanation:

94.5 J of heat was transferred out of the system. The first law of thermodynamics states that the change in the internal energy of a system is equal to the heat added to the system minus the work done by the system.

Mathematically, ΔU = Q - W, where ΔU is the change in internal energy, Q is the heat added to the system, and W is the work done by the system.

Given that the internal energy decreases by 125 J while performing 30.5 J of work, we can find the heat transferred into the system as follows:

ΔU = Q - W

-125 J = Q - 30.5 J

Q = -125 J + 30.5 J

Q = -94.5 J

The negative sign indicates that heat was transferred out of the system. Therefore, 94.5 J of heat was transferred out of the system.

To know more about thermodynamics , refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1368306#

#SPJ11

The maintenance of military defense and the national parks system that must be renewed every year falls under the category of government current spending, also known as government consumption.

Government current spending refers to the expenses incurred by the government on the day-to-day activities of providing public goods and services, such as education, healthcare, defense, and infrastructure maintenance.

This spending is financed through taxes and other forms of revenue collected by the government.

Government current spending is different from government capital spending, which involves investment in infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and buildings.

To know more about military defense, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31747991#

#SPJ11

The approximate electrostatic force between two protons each having a charge of +1. 6 x 10-19 C separated by a distance of 1. 0 × 10–6 meter A) 2.3 × 10^–16 N and repulsive.

To calculate the electrostatic force between two protons, we can use Coulomb's Law:

F = (k * q1 * q2) / r^2

where F is the electrostatic force, k is Coulomb's constant (8.99 × 10^9 N m^2 C^−2), q1 and q2 are the charges of the two protons, and r is the distance between them.

Given: q1 = q2 = +1.6 × 10^-19 C, r = 1.0 × 10^-6 m

Now, plug the values into the formula:

F = (8.99 × 10^9 N m^2 C^−2 * (1.6 × 10^-19 C)^2) / (1.0 × 10^-6 m)^2

F ≈ 2.3 × 10^-16 N

Since both charges are positive, the electrostatic force will be repulsive. Therefore, the correct answer is:

A) 2.3 × 10^–16 N and repulsive

For more about electrostatic force:

https://brainly.com/question/9774180

#SPJ11

Isaac Newton was born on January 4, 1643, in England. He was 23 years old when he formulated the theory of universal gravity in 1666.

This was during a period when he was isolating himself to avoid the bubonic plague outbreak that was ravaging England at that time.

While in isolation, Newton engaged in extensive scientific research and discovered the laws of motion, optics, and gravity.

His theory of universal gravitation proposed that every particle of matter in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

This theory revolutionized the field of physics and remains a fundamental concept in modern science.

To know more about bubonic plague, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/23399204#

#SPJ11

If a rocket takes off from Earth with a certain force, there are several things that must be true about Earth to make this possible.

Firstly, Earth must have a gravitational field that attracts the rocket toward its center. This gravitational force pulls the rocket toward the ground, and the rocket must overcome it with a force greater than the force of gravity in order to take off.

Secondly, Earth's atmosphere must be present, as the rocket needs to push against the air molecules to create thrust and lift off the ground. Thirdly, Earth's surface must be firm enough to support the launch of the rocket, with a strong and stable launchpad to prevent any accidents.

Fourthly, Earth's rotational speed and position in its orbit around the Sun must also be taken into account, as this affects the required trajectory of the rocket for a successful launch. Overall, a combination of Earth's gravitational force, atmosphere, surface conditions, and position in its orbit all play a crucial role in enabling a rocket to take off from Earth.

To learn more about Rocket

https://brainly.com/question/15061209

#SPJ4