When he was 30, Kearney began investing $200 per month in various securities for his retirement savings. His investments averaged a 5. 5% annual rate of return until he retired at age 68. What was the value of Kearney's retirement savings when he retired? Assume monthly compounding of interest

Answer: x=55/6 or 55 over 6

Step-by-step explanation: Step 1: Distribute:

- 350= 12(x+20)

- 350= 12x + 240

Step 2: Subtract 240 from both sides:

- 350-240= 12x+240-240

Step 3: Simplify:

Subtract the numbers: 350-240= 12x+240-240= 110=12x+240-240

Subtract again: 110=12x+240-240= 110=12x

Step 4: Divide both sides by the same factor:

110=12x= 110/12= 12x/12

Step 5: Simplify:

- Divide the numbers: 110/12=12x/12= x=55/6=12x/12

- Cancel terms that are in both the numerator and denominator: 55/6=12x/12= 55/6=x

- Move the variables to the left: 55/6=x = x=55/6

Answer: x=55/6 or 55 over 6

The customer purchased 2 small baskets and 6 large baskets.

Let x be the number of small baskets and y be the number of large baskets that the customer purchases.

We can set up a system of two equations based on the information given:

Equation 1: x + y = 8 (The total number of baskets purchased is 8)

Equation 2 3x + 5y = 36:  (The total amount paid for the baskets is $36)

To solve this system, we can use either substitution or elimination method.

Using substitution method:

From Equation 1, we have x = 8 - y.

Substitute this into Equation 2:

3(8 - y) + 5y = 36

24 - 3y + 5y = 36

2y = 12

y = 6

Now, we can substitute y = 6 back into Equation 1 to find x:

x + 6 = 8

x = 2

Therefore, the customer purchased 2 small baskets and 6 large baskets.

Using elimination method:

We can multiply Equation 1 by 3 and subtract it from Equation 2 to eliminate x:

 3x + 5y = 36

- (3x + 3y = 24)

   2y = 12

    y = 6

Now, we can substitute y = 6 back into either Equation 1 or Equation 2 to find x. Let's use Equation 1:

x + 6 = 8

x = 2

To know more about basket refer here

https://brainly.com/question/54060245#

#SPJ1

Answer:

25%

Step-by-step explanation:

one 4th of 8,000 is 2,000 convert it to a percent and there you go!

Give brainliest please! Enjoy your night!

Answer:

Trapezoid.

Step-by-step explanation:

Flo ate more of the sandwich than Arnie.

Option A is the correct answer.

We have,

We need to compare the values 3/4 and 2/3 to determine which fraction represents a larger amount of sandwiches eaten.

To make the fractions comparable, we need to find a common denominator.

The least common multiple of 4 and 3 is 12.

So we can rewrite 3/4 and 2/3 with 12 as the denominator:

3/4 = 9/12

2/3 = 8/12

Comparing these fractions, we see that 9/12 (or 3/4) is greater than 8/12

(or 2/3).

Therefore,

Flo ate more of the sandwich than Arnie.

Learn more about fractions here:

https://brainly.com/question/24370499

#SPJ1

The length of side AB is 6.3 units.

The length of side AB is solved using the distance formula below

AB = √((x₂ - x₁)² + (y₂ - y₁)²

where

(x₁, y₁) = (-9, 0) and

(x₂, y₂) = (-3, 2).

AB = √((-3 - (-9))² + (2 - 0)²)

AB = √(6² + 2²)

AB = √(40)

AB = 2√(10)

AB = 6.3245

AB = 6.3 to the nearest tenth

Therefore, the length of side AB is 6.3 units.

Learn more about distance formula t

https://brainly.com/question/661229

#SPJ1

Answer:

The population proportion is given as 58% or 0.58 in decimal form.

The sample size is given as 50 Americans.

Yes, the normal approximation can be used with this distribution because the sample size is sufficiently large (n=50) and the underlying population is assumed to be large enough to satisfy the independence requirement.

The mean of the sampling proportion (o) can be calculated using the formula:

mean = population proportion = 0.58

Therefore, the mean of the sampling proportion is 0.58 or 58%.

To know more about decimal refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30958821#

#SPJ11

The mistake, Aleks made, while measuring the angle is, he measure the angle from the wrong side of the line.

Angle is a dimensionless vector quantity, that is, it is very important, to take care of the directions, while measuring the angle.

That is, to measure the angle, say ∠ABC, the 0°(reference) line of the protractor, must be on one either AB or BC, to measure the angle rightly.

And since the angles between two lines are supplementary in nature, that is, the two angles will add up to make 180°, that is why, the angle measure by Alek and Melanie, add up to make 180°.

Read more about angle at:

https://brainly.com/question/1309590

Thus, the coordinates of Y and Z after the translation is obtained as :

Y'(-2,4) and Z'(-4, 3).

A figure is translated when it is moved from one point to another without changing in size, form, or rotation.

Given translation:

Point X(1,4) --->  point X'(0,6)

There is 1 unit shift to left as 1 is subtracted to x coordinate to get 0.

There is 2 unit shift to upward as 2 is added to y coordinate to get 6..

Translation:

(x,y) --->(x - 1, y + 2)

Applying same on points Y and Z,

Y(-1,2)  --> Y'(-2,4)

Z(-3,1)  --> Z'(-4, 3)

Thus, the coordinates of Y and Z after the translation is obtained as :

Y'(-2,4) and Z'(-4, 3).

Know more about the translation

https://brainly.com/question/1574635

#SPJ1

The equation Claude created is: 10 * (1.5)^t = 200,000,000, where t represents the number of hours.

Let A be the initial area of the fungus that covers the 10 square mile section of the planet.

After 1 hour, the fungus increases in size by 50%, which means it multiplies by 1.5. Thus, the area covered by the fungus after 1 hour is:

A + 1.5A = 2.5AAfter 2 hours, the fungus increases again by 50%, so its area becomes:

2.5A + 1.5(2.5A) = 6.25A

In general, after n hours, the area of the fungus becomes: A(1.5)^n

Since we want the fungus to cover the entire planet, we need to solve the following equation: A(1.5)^41 = 200,000,000

Simplifying, we get:

A = 200,000,000 / (1.5)^41

Therefore, the equation that Claude created is:

A(1.5)^n = 200,000,000

where n is the number of hours it takes for the fungus to cover the planet.

To learn more about “area” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ11

The exact distance between the planes, using radicals as needed, is d = 6√62 / 62.

To find the distance d between the two planes 6x + 5y + z = 54 and 6x + 5y + z = 48, we can use the formula for the distance between parallel planes:

d = |C1 - C2| / √(A^2 + B^2 + C^2)

where A, B, and C are the coefficients of the x, y, and z terms respectively, and C1 and C2 are the constants in the two equations.

In this case, A = 6, B = 5, C = 1, C1 = 54, and C2 = 48. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

d = |54 - 48| / √(6^2 + 5^2 + 1^2)
d = 6 / √(36 + 25 + 1)
d = 6 / √62

So the distance between the two planes is d = 6/√62. You can simplify this expression by rationalizing the denominator:

d = (6/√62) * (√62/√62)
d = 6√62 / 62

Thus, the exact distance between the planes, using radicals as needed, is d = 6√62 / 62.

radicalshttps://brainly.com/question/7572132

#SPJ11

To calculate the second derivative of a function, we need to take the derivative of the first derivative. The second derivative gives us information about the curvature of the function. A positive second derivative indicates that the function is concave up, while a negative second derivative indicates that the function is concave down. A second derivative of zero indicates that the function has no curvature at that point.

In the first example given, y = -5x^2 + x, we first find the first derivative by taking the derivative of the function with respect to x. This gives us dy/dx = -10x + 1. To find the second derivative, we take the derivative of dy/dx with respect to x. This gives us d²y/d²x = -10. This indicates that the function has a constant negative curvature, meaning it is concave down everywhere.

In the second example given, y = 7/x, we first find the first derivative by taking the derivative of the function with respect to x. This gives us dy/dx = -7/x^2. To find the second derivative, we take the derivative of dy/dx with respect to x. This gives us d²y/dx² = 14/x^3. This indicates that the function is concave up for positive values of x and concave down for negative values of x. The second derivative is undefined at x = 0, indicating a point of inflection.

Overall, the second derivative gives us important information about the behavior of a function and can help us identify points of inflection and concavity.
MORE PROBLEM ON DERIVATIVES : https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ11

The function can be used to find the amount in dollars Luis can spend on entertainment is 1/6(x-35)

Total amount of money luis get from his parent = x dollars

The amount luis has to pay to his parents for his cell phone is $35

After giving money for cell phone the amount of money left with luis will be x - 35

so, remaining money with luis = x - 35

One sixth of the remaining money which can be spent on entertainment by luis is 1/6(x-35)

The function can be written in the form of

f(x) = 1/6(x-35)

To know more about function click here :

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ4

The distance between the airplane and the tower is approximately 1864.5 meters.

To solve this problem, we can use trigonometry. Let's draw a diagram to help us visualize the situation:

```
   T
  /|
 / |
/  | 500m
/a  |
--------
  x
```

In this diagram, "T" represents the control tower, "a" represents the airplane, and "x" represents the distance between them. We know that the height of the airplane is 500m, and the angle of depression from the tower to the airplane is 15 degrees. This means that the angle between the horizontal ground and the line from the tower to the airplane is also 15 degrees.

Using trigonometry, we can set up the following equation:

```
tan 15 = 500 / x
```

We can solve for "x" by multiplying both sides by "x" and then dividing by tan 15:

```
x = 500 / tan 15
```

Using a calculator, we can find that tan 15 is approximately 0.2679. Therefore:

```
x = 500 / 0.2679
x ≈ 1864.5m
```

So the distance between the airplane and the tower is approximately 1864.5 meters.

Learn more about trigonometry,

https://brainly.com/question/29766029

#SPJ11

The direction of fastest increase in temperature at the point (1, 3, 1) is given by the unit vector (-5/sqrt(10) , -3/sqrt(10) , -9/sqrt(10)).

To find the direction of fastest increase in temperature at the point (1, 3, 1), we need to find the gradient of the temperature function T(x, y, z) at that point.

The gradient of a function is a vector that points in the direction of steepest increase, and its magnitude is the rate of change in that direction. So, we can find the gradient vector ∇T(x, y, z) as follows:

∇T(x, y, z) = ( ∂T/∂x , ∂T/∂y , ∂T/∂z )

=[tex]( -20xe^(-2x^2-y^2-3z^2) , -2ye^(-2x^2-y^2-3z^2) , -6ze^(-2x^2-y^2-3z^2) )[/tex]

Therefore, at the point (1, 3, 1), the gradient of T(x, y, z) is:

∇T(1, 3, 1) = [tex]( -20e^(-8) , -6e^(-8) , -18e^(-8) )[/tex]

To find the direction of fastest increase, we need to normalize this vector to a unit vector. The magnitude of the gradient vector is:

|∇T(1, 3, 1)| = sqrt( (-[tex]20e^(-8))^2 + (-6e^(-8))^2 + (-18e^(-8))^2 )[/tex]

= sqrt( 640e^(-16) )

= 8e^(-8) sqrt(10)

So, the unit vector in the direction of fastest increase is:

( -20e^(-8) / (8e^(-8) sqrt(10)) , -6e^(-8) / (8e^(-8) sqrt(10)) , -18e^(-8) / (8e^(-8) sqrt(10)) )

= ( -5/sqrt(10) , -3/sqrt(10) , -9/sqrt(10) )

Therefore, the direction of fastest increase in temperature at the point (1, 3, 1) is given by the unit vector (-5/sqrt(10) , -3/sqrt(10) , -9/sqrt(10)).

To learn more about unit vector visit: https://brainly.com/question/30279109

#SPJ11

To find the scale factor that takes polygon N to polygon P, you need to divide the corresponding side lengths of the two polygons.

To find the scale factor that takes polygon N to polygon P, you need to divide the corresponding side lengths of the two polygons.

For example, if one of the sides of polygon N is 6 units long, and the corresponding side of polygon P is 9 units long, then the scale factor is 9/6 or 1.5. This means that polygon P is 1.5 times larger than polygon N in all dimensions.

To determine the scale factor for all the corresponding sides of the polygons, you can compare each pair of sides and divide the length of the corresponding side of polygon P by the length of the corresponding side of polygon N.

It's important to note that when finding the scale factor between two polygons, you must compare corresponding sides. That is, you can't just choose any two sides to compare; you must compare the sides that are in the same position in the two polygons.

Learn more about polygon here: https://brainly.com/question/29425329

#SPJ1

The calculated width of the scale drawing is 0.67 cm and the missing side length is undefined

We have the following statements from the question

The above statements means that the width of the scale is

Scale width = 335 cm  * 1/500

When the products are evaluated, we have the following

Scale width = 0.67 cm

This means that the width of the scale drawing is 0.67 cm

Also, the missing side length of the original plot of land in meters cannot be calculated

Read more about scale factor at

https://brainly.com/question/29229124

#SPJ1

The distance between the two scout patrols is approximately 11.66 kilometers.

We can see that the situation forms a right triangle with the hypotenuse representing the distance between the two scout patrols. Let's call this distance d.

Each patrol initially hikes 5 kilometers in opposite directions. This means that the distance between them at this point is 10 kilometers (5 km + 5 km).

Then, each patrol turns 90 degrees to their right and hikes 6 kilometers. This means that they travel along the legs of the right triangle, which have a length of 6 kilometers.

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can solve for the hypotenuse:

d² = 10² + 6²

d² = 136

d ≈ 11.66 km

To learn more about distance click on,

https://brainly.com/question/21727359

#SPJ1

The pair of numbers  3/5 and -5/3,  -1/3 and 3 are perpendicular because two lines are perpendicular if and only if the product of their gradients is -1.

Each pair of numbers, we have to decide if lines with these gradients are perpendicular or not

Two lines are perpendicular if and only if the product of their gradients is -1.

For 5 and 1/5

The product is 1 which is not -1, so these are not perpendicular.

For 3/5 and -5/3

The product is -1 so these are perpendicular

For 1/4 and -1/4

The product is -1/16 so these are not perpendicular.

For -1/3 and 3

The product is  -1 so these are perpendicular

Hence, the pair of numbers  3/5 and -5/3,  -1/3 and 3 are perpendicular.

To learn more on slope of line click:

https://brainly.com/question/16180119

#SPJ1

Answer:

Here is the complete magic square:

-3 4 -1

2 0 -2

1 -4 3

Every row, column, and long diagonal adds to 0.

The limit of (69²-24) as x approaches infinity is equal to infinity.

As x approaches infinity, the value of (69²-24) becomes very large, and it goes to infinity. Therefore, the limit of (69²-24) as x approaches infinity is infinity.

B) The limit of (4a+2)/(2-a) as a approaches 2 from the left is equal to -6 and as a approaches 2 from the right is equal to 6.

As a approaches 2 from the left, the denominator (2-a) approaches zero from the negative side, and the numerator (4a+2) approaches -6. Therefore, the limit of (4a+2)/(2-a) as a approaches 2 from the left is -6.

As a approaches 2 from the right, the denominator (2-a) approaches zero from the positive side, and the numerator (4a+2) approaches 6. Therefore, the limit of (4a+2)/(2-a) as a approaches 2 from the right is 6.

For more questions like Limit click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/12211820

#SPJ11

Answer:

209.07 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

radius= 8÷2=4 feet

volume of hemisphere=((4/3)×(22/7)×r^3)/2

=134.09 cubic feet

Mass=density × volume

=86×134.09

=209.07 pounds

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

625

We can use an inequality to determine the number of biking outfits Shandra can purchase while staying within her budget.

Let o represent the number of outfits she can purchase. Here are the given terms and costs:
- Initial budget: $760
- Bicycle cost: $433.54
- 2 reflectors cost: 2 * $18.41 = $36.82
- Bike gloves cost: $10.76
- Outfit cost: $66.40 each

Now, we can set up the inequality:
760 >= 433.54 + 36.82 + 10.76 + 66.40 * o

First, combine the constants:
760 >= 481.12 + 66.40 * o

Now, subtract 481.12 from both sides:
278.88 >= 66.40 * o

Finally, divide both sides by 66.40:
o <= 4.2

Since Shandra can only purchase whole outfits, the maximum number of outfits she can buy is 4. So the inequality representing this situation is o <= 4.

To know more about inequality refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190?#

SPJ11

Answer:

The equation y = 10x + 5 is in slope-intercept form, y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

The equation y = 10x + 5 is in slope-intercept form, y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.Slope (m) = 10

The equation y = 10x + 5 is in slope-intercept form, y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.Slope (m) = 10Y-intercept (b) = 5

The equation y = 10x + 5 is in slope-intercept form, y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.Slope (m) = 10Y-intercept (b) = 5The slope represents the rate of change of the monthly rate with respect to the fee to join. For every increase of $1 in the fee to join, the monthly rate increases by $10.

The equation y = 10x + 5 is in slope-intercept form, y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.Slope (m) = 10Y-intercept (b) = 5The slope represents the rate of change of the monthly rate with respect to the fee to join. For every increase of $1 in the fee to join, the monthly rate increases by $10.The y-intercept represents the initial cost of joining the gym. It is the amount that the gym charges even if the fee to join is $0. In this case, the gym charges $5 to join.

Answer:

The height of the flagpole is approximately 5.774 meters.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the height of the flagpole h. We can use trigonometry to set up the following equation:

tan(30°) = h/10

Simplifying this equation, we get:

h = 10 tan(30°)

Using a calculator, we find that tan(30°) ≈ 0.5774, so:

h ≈ 5.774 meters

Therefore, the height of the flagpole is approximately 5.774 meters.

To know more about flagpole refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31296662#

#SPJ11

the marginal profit when 4 units are produced and sold is approximately -$69.14. This means that when producing and selling the 4th unit, the profit will decrease by $69.14.

To find the marginal profit when 4 units are produced and sold, we first need to find the derivative of the profit function P(x) with respect to x. The given profit function is:

P(x) = (x^2) / (2x + 1)

Now, let's find its derivative, which represents the marginal profit function:

dP/dx = (d/dx(x^2))/(2x + 1) - (x^2)(d/dx(2x + 1))/((2x + 1)^2)

First, find the derivative of x^2 and 2x + 1:

d/dx(x^2) = 2x
d/dx(2x + 1) = 2

Now, substitute these values into the marginal profit function:

dP/dx = (2x)/(2x + 1) - (x^2)(2)/((2x + 1)^2)

Next, we'll find the marginal profit when 4 units are produced and sold. So, let's substitute x = 4 into the marginal profit function:

dP/dx(4) = (2 * 4)/(2 * 4 + 1) - (4^2)(2)/((2 * 4 + 1)^2)

dP/dx(4) = (8)/(9) - (32)(2)/(81)

dP/dx(4) = (8 - 64)/(81)

dP/dx(4) = -56/81

Since the profit is in hundreds of dollars, we need to multiply the marginal profit by 100 to get the value in dollars. Then, round to the nearest cent:

Marginal profit in dollars = (-56/81) * 100 ≈ -$69.14

So, the marginal profit when 4 units are produced and sold is approximately -$69.14. This means that when producing and selling the 4th unit, the profit will decrease by $69.14.

to know more about marginal profit click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29785280

#SPJ11

The value of the simplified expression is -15.

The simplification of the expression is determined by substituting the appropriate values of the variables into the equation.

The given expression; = 54/g - 8h

The value of g = 6 and the value of h = 3,

The value of the expression is calculated as follows;

= 54/g - 8h

= 54/6 - 8(3)

= 9 - 24

= - 15

Learn more about simplification here: https://brainly.com/question/28008382

#SPJ1

The complete question is below:

54/g - 8h, when g = 6 and h=3

The number of nickels and pennies in the pocket is 5 and 16 respectively.

To find the number of coins, Let's assume the number of nickels is x and the number of pennies is y.

According to the problem, we have two equations:

The total value of the coins is $0.41:

0.05x + 0.01y = 0.41

The total number of coins is 21:

x + y = 21

Now we can solve this system of equations to find x and y. One way to do this is to use substitution.

Solving the second equation for y, we get:

y = 21 - x

Substituting this into the first equation, we get:

0.05x + 0.01(21 - x) = 0.41

Simplifying:

0.05x + 0.21 - 0.01x = 0.41

0.04x = 0.2

x = 5

So we have 5 nickels.

Substituting this into the equation y = 21 - x, we get:

y = 21 - 5 = 16

So we have 16 pennies.

Therefore, the number of nickels and pennies in the pocket is 5 and 16 respectively.

Learn more about Coins counting

brainly.com/question/27681719

#SPJ11

Answer:

5x-9

Step-by-step explanation:

Distribute: 3x-(2x+9) + 4x

3x - 2x - 9 + 4x

Combine Like Terms: 3x - 2x - 9 + 4x

5x-9